Interesting Sik, hadn't thought of it in that way. So you think that the added meals will allow for more insulin to build muscle. However did you consider the difference in insulin sensitivity, or the fact that glucagon increases lipolsys during the fast while also increasing the insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle? To remove exposure of the muscle cells to the glucagon for extended periods would lower insulin sensitivity or keep it from being as elevated as it would be with the 16 hour fast. Also, the more time that blood sugar is floating around increasing insulin production would also lower insulin sensitivity. So I am not sure that there would be any benefit to removing 4 hours from the fasting window if Lean Gains is the goal as opposed to just gains on the scale.
Yes i consider differences in insulin sensitivity. You can increase the sensitivity through weight trainning, calories/carb cycling, etc and through fasting. What i'm saying is that sometimes will be better to use an example of 4 meals a day, with only 12h fast instead of overeating in REAL CLEAN food.
If someone follow this, low in nuts, and only clean food is not so easy to add "lean gains" along sometime. I like to be in this way honestly, but to see some "big changes" sometimes i can change a little the schedule. I'm talking about increasing one meal a day, about 500-600kcal only for 4-6 weeks. This will not lower enough your insulin sensitivity, you CAN EVEN benefit from long term you've fasting 16/8. This is not documented, its bases on what i've seen.
Even when i knoe someone with this approach, using any anabolic compound i'm the first to tell them to increase the number of meals, at least one more meal with carbs.
I believe my 16/8 protocol is light trainning twice a day. First "train" is fast, feed. Second train is with weights and BIGGER meal. Probably sound stupid, but i'm only explaining the body working well with catabolic/anabolic rebound.
But i'm a HFT lover, so the increase in ONE meal day, will allow me probable to WO twice a day for something like 4-6 weeks, with some results.
I don't have the intention of ever "Bulking" again. Once I hit a nice lean level I will be "lean gaining" up to the size I am looking for then switching to recomp to build the muscle up while leaning out at the same weight.
I understand that, believe me as i lost 40kg along this years, in a big learning curve i'm not looking for the term bulk. Is only an approach like saying "ok i can eat MC donalds 3x week, i'm bulking". i correct, bull****ing
Now if on a cycle or something that is different. I expect to gain with the speed of a bulk however not gain fat, as I am doing now.
Correct, this was what i intend to add to this thread! We are synchronized.
Not saying you are incorrect either. A year of eating this way you should have some insight into this for sure. However from what I know and understand about how the body deals with the fast, and refeed. As well as what hormonal changes come along with or drive that situation and I can't really see how it would benefit body composition or the ability to grow muscle if the only factor being changed was using a 12 hour fast and 12 hour feed window.
I believe it can make a difference. Even if you INCREASE the fast for 36h, ADF, and do a BIGGER calorie day on the refeeding day you can work 3 day like, half period fast, half period eat train eat.
I'm not saying you do that, but i know people who use th eIF approach as an excuse to eat like crap. If they are eating like i eat, veg, eggs, not so many nuts, and little carbs (even with IF i can not handle a lot), it becames more difficult to increase the calories/carbs without the sleepy feeling.
I tried sometime ago, "blast" phases where i just increase my carb intake for 100g, more protein too, and add it as a 1st meal of the day. It worked fine, scale moved quicker, don't see fat gains, but i'm carbophobic.
Again, this is not documented with science neither craved in stone, just my opinion.
I founf that even Chad Waterburry, i trainer that i respect, use a similar approach so i think maybe he thinks the same, assuming that.