What does a fight have to do with this?
Well, it has to do with the manner in which you express your thoughts on violence: namely, as a conflation between 1950's greaser nostalgia and turn-of-the-century Civil War films - that is, as completely romanticized, unrealistic and riven between a personal moral-nobility and a necessary savagery. Each time you explicate your vague and emotion-rife theories on revolution, government, liberty violence and the like - a perfect case in-point being the above post - the dialogue seems to be directly lifted from an early-Brando or James Dean film.
The explicit nostalgic and idyllic character to your thoughts on violence is highly indicative of the "thing" that I have been driving at, and the answer to what a "fight" has to do with all of this: that actual, living violence has played no part in constructing your concept on fighting, war, violence death and so on - in simpler terms: you have never actually been in a fight, and take your cue from movies, novels and gross misconceptions on the nobility of violence.
In my experiences, even if abhorrent experiences they may be, there are two (general) types of individuals who romanticize and glorify violence in the manner you do: a) individuals who suffer from a pathological compulsion to commit it, and; b) individuals who have had the luxury of ironic detachment from it, and thus, the luxury of romanticizing it in that fashion. And this romantic bent to your thought, unfortunately for you, bleeds your true nature - that is, as the former type of individual - through all the ridiculous rhetoric; and particularly so for any individual who has had the unfortunate pleasure of suffering a violent past, and thus the ability to properly characterize violence for what it is.
The fact is this, plain as day: had you ever been in the position to truly hurt another individual - and I mean
truly hurt them, not in the sense of the "Kings 4:20 does not say that!" scuffles you had in Bible study - you would not possess these gross misconceptions about the nature of violence itself; mainly, a nature that is crude and that very few individuals possess the ability to enact in full. I do not believe for a second you possess the ability to shoot, stab, mane, disfigure or otherwise seriously harm an individual in the context of a "violent revolution" that you incessantly refer to; and nor do I even feel that, if and when the time came, you would desire to do so.
Stop all the incoherent and, possibly more importantly, unconvincing ramblings about violence, death and the like: your insincerity shines through immensely, and makes most people - as evidenced, again, by this thread - wholeheartedly dismiss your thoughts as fabricated. Considering you seem to be enamored by a sense of masculine respect that has never exist, you should know most people respect the "truth in action" far more than they respect an individual who can promulgate ridiculous notions on violence over the internet.
And at this point, your patent response should be something to the effect of: "...[insert irrelevant commentary about "liberal education" and grammar here]...
I'm not concerned with convincing anybody...[insert glorified violence comment here]...blah, blah my family I'd kill for...[something about the grace of God]". What you never seem to realize, however, is that you are, quite desperately, trying to convince us all of something - and that something seems to change from day-to-day. Your lack of introspection is, for lack of a better word, tragic: your constant need for verification and recognition betrays the caricature "masculinity" of your thoughts and reveals the inexperience and insecurity that belies your nature. And where the lack of introspection comes into play is that you fail to realize that the majority of us on the site have felt and thought and considered things in precisely the manner you do. The only difference being is that we were thirteen when it was occurring; and hence B5150 harping on your age. The fact is, you allow your age to be used against you because you act like you are a confused thirteen year-old little boy desperately trying to assert his identity amongst "the big boys".
Like most people on this site, I frequently tire of your ridiculous bull**** and rhetoric, and your absolute inability to introspect. Honestly, dude, shut the **** up and find yourself.
