Guest viewing is limited

M-Drol for women

rottie76

Active member
Hey everyone -

I'm a female bodybuilder looking to try some M-Drol. It seems cheap and from all the feedback I've read it seems to be working.

I've taken Winny and Oxavar before and it was fine - no interaction with b-control pills, no androgenic side effects.

Can anyone please tell me if M-Drol would be OK to use? If not - what it the best pro-hormone without much androgens. I don't have much $$$ to buy the real stuff.

Thanks!
 
i've heard/read of women taking it before. so search for some logs first. i know i have never seen women run it past 10mgs...the most common dosage is 5mgs. i just don't feel right suggesting a woman be taking it lol. maybe something like epi/havoc would be more suited for you..maybe even bold or h-drol.
 
I have seen nothing but sides from designers. I could not recommend any of them. However somewhere on here there are a few logs from women that say they ran them okay.

I did okay on Havoc initially until it started messing with my voice. I stopped using it and it went back to normal. So it really depends on what sides you are willing to live with.
 
I don't think anybody is going to recommend you take m-drol but personally I think it would make a better choice than Epistane or Havoc because it's far less androgenic than the former compound. It may even be less androgenic than anavar, which is the choice steroid for women.

There was a log of a woman who tried m-drol and pyramided it 2.5/5/10/5/2.5 and didn't report any side effects including blood tests.
 
OK - that sounds good. Hopefully the M-drol comes in tablets so I can cut them in half. The regular strenght is 5mg
 
M-Drol from CEL is a cap, and regular strength is now 10mg. You will be unable to cut them in half. S-Drol from FA is a tab, and comes in 10mg. You may be able to cut them in half.
 
crazyfool405 said:
maybe low dose Hdrol would be better? almost nil androgenic effecs.
Click to expand...
Feedback puts h-drol as slightly more angrogenic than m-drol. I remember seeing some posts a while back stating that too, i wish i could find them again.

M-drol seems to be a safe bet imo at a dose of like 5mg ed, or eod.
 
TripDog said:
Feedback puts h-drol as slightly more angrogenic than m-drol. I remember seeing some posts a while back stating that too, i wish i could find them again.

M-drol seems to be a safe bet imo at a dose of like 5mg ed, or eod.
Click to expand...

i coulda sworn Hdrol was less androgenic...


if thats not the case mdrol at 5-10mg EOD puls would be good.
 
when you say oxavar, is that some bunk pill u buy online that supposed to be anavar? or is it actually real anavar, and you were just shortening the word?
 
I saw this old thread and thought I'd add 2-cents for research purposes. A girl/friend I know ran 10mg for week 1 then 15mgs week 2 of Turinabol LV and that was about a month ago. I guess she has a graduated cylinder? LOL

She said that she experience no sides except a little more Type-A behavior and that her strength was up - set PRs for all lifts in the 2nd week lol. Her numbers as mentioned in the conversation was something like she lost 4lbs (cut I suppose); she said she didn't change her 40-40-20 macros at all.

I see her often (we are truly friends) and I definitely notice that her legs looked much leaner (sweep was way more pronounce) than I remember and her shoulders are a little more defined and rounder these days lol.

Qualitative I suppose but sounds like a short burst of such a compound did alright.
 
I seen a log a while back of a girl that ran 5mgs and she kept gaining weight so she stopped. Dont remember how long the run was but she was wanting to lean up. I'd start low if using mdrol.
 
Random input...and kind of old....but all this info may help others...

Im a female currently running Mdrol at 10mg/day. On my second week. No sides. Weight and strength are up. Will measure BF% using BODPOD next week.

Ive cycled PPlex, Hdrol, and 1-andro in the past.... from my experience, PPlex was by far the best results wise but got a ton of sides from it. I didnt really notice any size or strength gains from Hdrol OR 1-andro, but I leaned out some. Im looking forward to the results of this cycle
 
nice bump. since you bumped it, i'll feel free to correct some of the mis information i've glanced over skimming through this thread.

first, all steroids are capable of producing androgenic side effects. these effects will vary person to person. but they are all androgens & bind to the androgen receptor, hence why they are all capable of androgenic sides.

now that that is out the way, any women looking to use aas should probably stay away from dht derivatives.

epistane is actually a very androgenic steroid. saying it is less androgenic than cdma (halodrol) is just stupid.

oral turinabol was given an androgenic rating of 0 from vida. now, take that with a grain of salt, but it's still a very low androgenic compound.

for a women looking to go the legal route, hd would probably be the best option.

as far as legal goes, dht derivatives make up the majority of compounds.

mdrol is given a very low androgenic rating of 20, which is very low when compared to epistane, which is 90, and i feel it's metabolites are even more androgenic.

Anavar's androgenic rating is at 24, slightly higher than methyldrostanolone (superdrol).

anyhow, low dosed mdrol could be a good idea for a women. 5 mg is probably more than enough.

I can see decent results from 10mg of a quality sd clone as a man, so 10mg for a woman is probably a pretty powerful dose.

but i'd say to go with hd, or even fura thp ether, or pro stanozol, these would actually be pretty affordable for a women, as they wouldn't need as much as a man to see results.
 
whatever you girls do good luck and stay safe. in theory superdrol should be OK for female bodybuilders because it should be far more anabolic than androgenic but still it is hard for me to want to recommend it.
Monster EZ good luck in the coming weeks, maybe post an update in a little bit, I'm sure some people are interested to see how 10mg treats you.
 
Isnt she kinda playing with fire using any of these though? I mean, she mentioned she's on oral BC pills, so, wouldnt any of the PH/DS/AAS mess with estrogen levels, which has something to do with keeping the BC pills functioning properly?
 
I'm not seeing an issue with BC. The BC just shuts down a women. I think Superdrol would shut her down pretty similarly. Running both might make sure she is shutdown. Gyno is not an issue. Am I wrong on this guys?
I think the real issue is the androgenic sides.
 
jbryand101b said:
nice bump. since you bumped it, i'll feel free to correct some of the mis information i've glanced over skimming through this thread.

first, all steroids are capable of producing androgenic side effects. these effects will vary person to person. but they are all androgens & bind to the androgen receptor, hence why they are all capable of androgenic sides.

now that that is out the way, any women looking to use aas should probably stay away from dht derivatives.

epistane is actually a very androgenic steroid. saying it is less androgenic than cdma (halodrol) is just stupid.

oral turinabol was given an androgenic rating of 0 from vida. now, take that with a grain of salt, but it's still a very low androgenic compound.

for a women looking to go the legal route, hd would probably be the best option.

as far as legal goes, dht derivatives make up the majority of compounds.

mdrol is given a very low androgenic rating of 20, which is very low when compared to epistane, which is 90, and i feel it's metabolites are even more androgenic.

Anavar's androgenic rating is at 24, slightly higher than methyldrostanolone (superdrol).

anyhow, low dosed mdrol could be a good idea for a women. 5 mg is probably more than enough.

I can see decent results from 10mg of a quality sd clone as a man, so 10mg for a woman is probably a pretty powerful dose.

but i'd say to go with hd, or even fura thp ether, or pro stanozol, these would actually be pretty affordable for a women, as they wouldn't need as much as a man to see results.
Click to expand...

dude is obviously an expert ^^^^^

Jbry nuthin but love



ehhhhem

will i dont know much about aas interactions with females


but like j said they are ALL androgens so use with caution



and uhm im going to leave now
 
Do female have to.run any form of pct
 
K....I did my BodPod for the first 2 weeks of my Mdrol cycle:

I only dropped .3% body fat...gained 5.8 lbs lean and 1.2 lbs fat. Obviously this has to do with diet stuff so Im going to tweek that a little and hopefully be set for a better post result.

No bad sides to report. I started really noticing my strength increase on Wednesday of this past week....added 10 lbs to my hang clean and bench in a week. I just feel really good in the gym. Having a hard time sleeping....but I plan to fix that with some melatonin.

Any suggestions are welcome! :o)
 
I worked with Jodi on her cycle. I believe Matt of Designer Supplements Sponsored her with product and I broke it down into MG doses for her.

Invalid Link Removed

Sadly her log is unavailable because AvantLabs site is no longer up.

EDIT: It is likely still up at M&M but I have not been there in years and the board search function has changed and I am not having much luck.
 
I would recommend halodrol instead of sdrol for women. Oral Turinabol by Primordial Performance isn't in stock but I'm sure other companies produce decent clones. CEL or IBE, maybe.

Edit: Actually, after reading that last post by Heat Miser, I figure I don't know much anyway so why not listen to someone who knows more about women using steroids :)
 
Fwiw I hear Halodrol is actually slightly more androgenic and slightly less anabolic than Turinabol, given that it supposedly has activity on its own, before its conversion to actual Turinabol. I'd approach both MDrol and Hdrol with extreme caution, and perhaps opt for a different clone, where dosing in smaller amounts would be simpler, given CEL's cap route of administration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top