Let me clarify something.
In a previous post in another company thread Synapsin alluded to which products of ours he assisted in formulating. As this was their own thread I didn't comment on it however this is in our own company thread and someone implied he was responsible for our past formulations.
It is fair of me to clarify that this isn't the case, especially as some people believed his role in formulating was larger than it was (via comments I have seen on the forum as well as messages I have received).
Nothing I have posted is controversial or defamatory. I have simply explained that he was not a chief formulator for us (he knows this is true and would agree with it). I am kept in the loop with all formulations, ingredients we are researching and oversaw who contributed what to each profile.
If you read my post again there is nothing hostile in there and there is nothing that Synapsin would disagree with.
He wasn't chief formulator for us and the direction the company takes wasn't down to him, it is down to our company owner. Both of these are statements he, I and anyone else influential in the company know to be true.
It is fair for me to clarify the formulator roles within our company if I disagree with a post he has made implying which products he formulated for. I save all my emails, Facebook messages and What's App messages for years at a time so I have all communication regarding previous formulations, I wouldn't say something that wasn't true.
Once again, nothing I said was hostile or insulting. It is simply a position of clarification, something which is fair if I feel previous forum posts were misleading.