Sooo... A pulse of E stane, say 30* Mon Tues Wed. Repeat, for about 6 weeks, and a PCT anyway with Max labs After Fx... That sound safe to anyone?
first..thanks for at least responding to this..
i have no idea if u r being serious or not..or exactly what u r providing as an illustration of what u interpret as to what i m proposing...but none of it has anything whatsoever to do w what i call STACK PULSING
(30*...i assume means 30mg btw)
i m not sure if my proposal is ..obscure..n perhaps that is the problem..i tried to frame it in terms of the general principles of pulsing which i assume all in this thread r familiar w..n able to extrapolate from there to the serial rotational intermittent periodic ingestion of these agent in alternating fashion in the pulse cycle chain
wet..dry...wet..dry ..wet..dry....etc
meth..non-m...meth...non-m...etc
class 1...class 2...class 1 ...class 2...etc
eod.......M_W_F........2days on...2 days off.........2 weeks on ..2 weeks off..etc
bearing in mind that within these categories there r several agents allowing one to select their favorite in the category ..or opting for more variety/diversity alternating to another in that category the next time
that category pulse day presents itself in the cycle..thus
wet agent 1...dry agent 1...wet agent 2 .dry agent 2....wet agent 1..dry agent 1...n so on............(wet 3 ???)
the same alternations n agent changes can apply w methyls...classes...dht/estrogen/progestins ..etc
pulsing principles assumed: anabolic bumps followed by mini recovery off periods..minimizing sides shutdowns n desensitization of receptors
look either pulsing
DOES stand for relative sub-clinical clearance of individual agents from the system ...or..
.....if it
DOES NOT ...n still depends somehow on the continued presence OF THAT SPECIFIC/PARTICULAR AGENTS ongoing contribution ..no matter how minimal ...for the pulse to work (which case i suggest undermines n contradicts the actual theoretical foundation on which pulsing is based)
if it
DOES rest on clearance ...then there is no theoretical objection to providing the next anabolic bump from an entirely different category agent or same category different agent...which if true has obvious benefits..safety as one...fresh receptors as another
...in other words
keep rotating to a different category agent(s) or same category different agents ...or some alternating combo thereof..at each pulse point
even if pulsing
DOES NOT rest on clearance....but somehow depends on these ongoing sub-clinical presences of THE SAME AGENT...it still does not preclude the possibility that STACK PULSING on its own conceptual basis cannot also provide an alternative efficacious means to possibly even more desirably achieve our purposes
can we have a thoughtful exploration of this guys??