I feel that if Zama dieted and ate the way he described BEFORE the MDXT, then he should be consistent and do the same while he is ON MDXT, that way it seems we can really attribute any gains to the actual product, and not a fluctuation in his regime that may have "shocked" his system and caused gains or losses. It seems, to me anyway, that if he has remained consistent from BEFORE cycle, to ON cycle, we will be able to see something from the steroid(or lack of if case be) and not the diet and food itself. Maybe I am being simplistic and elementary in my thinking, but thats the way I see it. You guys that press him to modify from his norm really want the results to be favorable, I get that. But in all fairness to Zama, he should do his norm if he feels it works for HIM, and if there is a steroid in there, it will rear its head regardless, somewhere, somehow, and we can make a definitive conclusion if gains were made it was due to the substance, and not his body reacting to a change in caloric intake, or flux in macros, etc. It will simply eliminate one of the possibilities and perhaps arguments of what caused the gains, or lack thereof, if case be. Take away as many variables as we can, to narrow down the attributable results. MY opinion, not worth more or less than anyone else's in this thread. WHich mind us, is a FAVOR by Zama, lets not lose sight of that. Not an obligation of his.