Not really. It was more of a speculative and humorous jab.
I think [would have hoped] the FDA would have been more busy doing more important things like keeping the poisons out of our food.
I can be wrong, as it's just speculation and a bit of humor in light of the fact of what was done to Bernie by Hillary, and Trump is not your friend when it comes to anything related to the supplement industry or health.
Everything would have been better if Bernie had gotten the nomination, at least, or elected.
At least for us all in this industry. How would it not have been? I don't wish to begin a political derailing here. DMAA is still our focus. (pun)
Cheers!
What I'm saying is that the battle over DMAA has been going on long before this past election cycle, so it's not like the whole anti-DMAA crusade is a result of a Trump Presidency. It doesn't make sense to think that if Bernie was elected that the FDA would have all of a sudden dropped the DMAA issue that they invested time and money in, and switch their entire focus to, as you say, "more important things like keeping the poisons out of our food."
Also, the vast majority of politicians aren't our friends in regards to supplements, or what we put in our bodies in general. Wasn't the New York ban on large sodas done by a Democrat? Both sides want to tell us what we can and can't put in our bodies, it's just they have different ideas of what's "bad for us."
I don't want to turn this into another political thread, but if you don't either, I advise not bringing up essentially irrelevant politicians/issues for some sort of humor, especially when you know that it's likely a somewhat inflammatory issue/topic (Trump/Clinton/Sanders/etc).
I apologize if my sense of humor isn't working quite right this morning, but Bernie has nothing to do with DMAA, nor does Trump.