nattydisaster
PESCIENCE.com
It appears to be pretty effective at reducing DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness)
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
These results suggest that L-glutamine supplementation attenuates DOMS effects, muscle damage...
This is very important. How could we learn it?So it reduces muscle damage....isn't that the opposite of what we want?
It's for sure not scientific, but when i was using it, i grew. I didn't take anything else but WTF Pumped and Xtend. I know those didn't make me grow. It wasn't tons, but i did notice change. So amongst those 3 things i liked it.
I doubt i used it enough to justify my increase in muscle. I know there are many factors. I was only using Xtend every other day, once a day. I used it as more of an aid to rid of a sweet tooth, soda craving, and something refreshing.BCAAs would boost mps, so any time you used it, it slightly increased growth. It wouldn't be significant short term, but long term it would add up.
I second the immune system benefits. Not much else.
Yea, i had a reason, so I'm thinking it was GH release related or to keep from being "catabolic" when not eating. Do not recall though.anyone ever take their glutamine pre-bed?
This is very important. How could we learn it?
So it reduces muscle damage....isn't that the opposite of what we want?
Yea, i had a reason, so I'm thinking it was GH release related or to keep from being "catabolic" when not eating. Do not recall though.
LOL anyone else notice: There is a significant difference in aldolase level between control and experimental group (p> 0.05).
That was a common thought awhile back, but i think it was shown to be negligible amount absorbed into the gut and "wasted."Glutamine is mostly used up by the gut (mainly helps in repairing and maintaining gut / intestinal integrity) and also greatly aids with the immune system. Worth it for those two benefits alone.
I think they are referencing it as a relation rather than an amount. p is representative as a difference or relation. I think, based on what i remember from stats. So yes, .05 being the higher end of p is a large difference.LOL anyone else notice: There is a significant difference in aldolase level between control and experimental group (p> 0.05).
I think they are referencing it as a relation rather than an amount. p is representative as a difference or relation. I think, based on what i remember from stats. So yes, .05 being the higher end of p is a large difference.
Lol, also curious why they chose to use 'non-athletic' individuals.
Non-athletic individuals would experience greater DOMS than athletic individuals
That was a common thought awhile back, but i think it was shown to be negligible amount absorbed into the gut and "wasted."
I think they are referencing it as a relation rather than an amount. p is representative as a difference or relation. I think, based on what i remember from stats. So yes, .05 being the higher end of p is a large difference.
According to Houston (2001), “Glutamine content in skeletal muscle and other tissues appears to have a regulatory role in whole body protein synthesis.” Glutamine levels inside muscle govern protein synthesis and nitrogen balance and therefore muscle growth (VanAcker et al. 1999). The newly synthesized glutamine is created by using BCAA’s obtained from muscle protein breakdown (Holecek, 2002).
What all this means is glutamine requirements are trying to be met during/post workout by BCAA catabolism causing BCAA catabolism/muscle protein breakdown to be increased
Glutamine administration has been shown to decrease leucine oxidation (Holeck, 2002). The mechanism behind this decrease in oxidation is believed to be that glutamine oxidation increases NADH levels (and increases the NADH/NAD+ ratio), thereby inhibiting BCKA dehydrogenase, which is the “key-enzyme” in BCAA oxidation (Holeck, 2002).
Ive heard that when the bodies gltamine levels are low, muscles leach it from other places, or other places leach it from muscles. Dont know if thats true, but if it is, then loading your gut with glutamine may have a slow but eventually positive benefit for individuals who could use a little extra glutamine. This is all in theory though.
I may have it backwards. Like i said, it's been awhile since i took stats. Ill look into it. For now i'll take your word for it.What? p<0.05 is significant.
Lol, also curious why they chose to use 'non-athletic' individuals.
Glutamine can be used as a buffer. Had a theory for a while that the reason people report poorer recovery and extra soreness when they come off glutamine (hence, justifying them using it) was simply just because the body had downregulated it's own bicarbonate-producing abilities.
It appears to be pretty effective at reducing DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness)
Invalid Link Removed