-One is universally accepted as evil and easily identifiable. The other has the interesting viewpoint of the possibility of being manipulated. Not really a good comparison but nice extremest try.
-Airline pilots, engineers, surveyors, politicians, scientist, and scholars have and will continue coming forward on topics like the flat earth but your cognitive disbanded doesn’t allow you to see that.
-Bs-Business Administration.
This will be my last post here for 2 reasons:
1. I’ve realized there isn’t any viewpoints being discussed or theorized upon, yet only mindless insults and childish memes, so it holds no value for me any way and I don’t want to perpetuate negativity.
2. Muscleupcrohn I’ve realized by looking at your other posts that you get satisfaction in trying to attack other people that you feel your mind or body are superior too. (See plastic surgery thread where you obsessively posted pictures of Greek Gods your body and negative comments to someone who was only seeking help.) I can’t in good conscious feed into that, but hopefully since this has been acknowledged you can be aware of this and contribute in a more positive light.
Cheers,
-Thor 70
Here's the issue Thor, your cognitive bias is preventing you from even pretending to behave rationally.
Here's the truth, a round earth is observable. However, the SIZE of earth means that the curvature can not usually be seen by the naked eye. You can, at times, see things like boats moving off in to the horizon, or when you stand atop large structures however the curve you see is not dramatic. If you saw a dramatic curve, that would imply the world is only a few hundred miles across - we know this isn't true. Of course you will find images where the horizon 'looks' flat - that doesnt mean it is, only that you can only observe a tiny fraction of what constitutes the earth.
The world can be observed as round when you know what you're looking for, however flat earth 'scientists' (and i use that word very loosely in this case) do everything possible to skew these very real observations, to the point where they even fake rationale for them. Ive heard flat earthers use words like 'light refraction', 'buoyancy' and other terminology in order to explain away phenomenon created by a round earth, like horizons and gravity. Sure, you can explain away these phenomena in a singular event, but these theories do not withstand scrutiny when tested against other measureable things. You won't know that of course, because you only see each thing as being isolated, not interconnected.
Not a single video i have ever seen of the flat earth actually demonstrates the flat earth working as a system. They all point out as many different, isolated phenomenon as they can to jam in a video, but none actually show how it works together. Every time they are pressed on it, they ignore it and move on to something else that is isolated. None of which controbute anything meaningful to the debate other than to cloud it. Anything can seem true in isolation or when presented in correlation with a single other data point, however no flat earther has yet ever been able to explain how it all makes sense when working together. Heck you even said jet streams were a thing yet were unable to present evidence on how they could exist in a stationary and flat earth.
At the end of the day people like you are contributing to the downfall of civilisation, whether you know it or not. We are in some kind of knowledge overload, where we are presented with too much information yet not taught enough on how to seek the truth by sifting through the BS. The images of earth from NASA? Fake. Images of earth from the Chinese satellites? Fake. Russian? Also fake. Any image of earth taken from the one place that can actually see it is categorically denied, yet some guys image of the horizon is taken as fact? That my friend is confirmation bias. Believing only in which conforms to your idea of what the earth should be, not what it actually is.
What makes it even more sad is how many people categorically refute something, simply because they don't understand it. As Neil deGrasses Tyson said: the universe is under no obligation to make sense to you. However, the fact it doesn't make sense to you does not make it untrue, only that you dont understand it.
So many people apply that logic to the existance of many things, including the existance of fossils etc. They categorically deny that dinosaurs roamed the earth, even when showed extensive evidence that they existed, they pick and choose which data is real based on what they believe to be true, and what they want to be true.
If your believe in God hinges on denying obvious evidence, then you have weak faith that does not stand pressure.
