mich29
Board Sponsor
this reminds me of the good ole days over at the other site in regards to this discussion.I've personally never been a fan of using either for pct due to not seeing enough evidence to ensure it would be a safe idea and I'd rather not guess and see what is the sweet spot for myself.
here are a few quotes by patrick for food for thought on bromo 6
actually you are right
checking the numbers again i noticed alpha units were in nanograms while beta was micrograms. thousand fold difference between the two
so in that case i revise my opinion and state that 6-bromo seems like a bad choice all around. if the weakly androgenic beta was the stronger i would say there was hope but as you pointed out, its not
i assume hyperdrol contains 6-bromo
well at least you seem to understand what i am talking about
6-bromo appears to be more suitable for use as a prohormone and probably requires PCT afterwards
probably not really strong PCT but PCT regardless
6-bromo is synthetic
my contention has never been that it suppresses. instead i am saying it's probably like formestane, which appears to have a neutral effect on HPTA (or a very weak positive one).
such anecdotal reports as these are so muddied with confounding factors that it has hard to gain much insight into anything. you need some people with normal HPTA function taking the 6-Br as a standalone for a period of time - just like was done in the 6-oxo studies
read more closely and you will see that in that sentence i also said "HPTA stimulating action acheived via its aromatase inhibitory potential"
so yes, i am saying there is suppression going on. but then i am also saying there is stimulation going on. the first is androgen receptor mediated and the second is estrogen receptor mediated
i think their is a counterbalance of effects going on there. But the pro-gonadotropic effect of the AI potential probably weighs more heavy
localized estrogen production in the brain is vital to libido. if you shut down aromatase in the brain then you will affect libido. the literature is abundant with examples of this
still people would be better off with a pure AI in my opinion, as these should be stronger
net effect is probably zero.
this is a mild prohormone with anti-aromatase activities. very similar to formestane. with formestane you can get slight anabolic effects with minimal suppression because the anti-aromatase activity will act to keep the HPTA up to par during cycle - at least to some extent.
It is inarguable that formestane is everything i just said it is, the science is indisputable on that. It is also inarguable that formestane is not nearly as good at stimulating the HPTA as a "clean" anti-aromatase, and therefore a poor choice for PCT. Furthermore, standalone cycles of formestane DO result in "decent gains with little sides" - just like you are saying is seen with 6-bromo
BTW, i dunno why you throw superdrol in there as a point of comparison. It is completely on the other end of the steroid hormone spectrum
let me break this down
nobody knows if this product has substantial sex hormone activity for sure. Not myself, not ######
So the best we can do is look at closely related data and make assumptions. I did that and I presented a strong case that this stuff is more likely than not androgenic and possibly suppressive
You must also assume that #####has decided that it is not suppressive, since they are selling it as PCT.
#####presents no logic for it being not suppressive. no science.
they sell the product not i. they obviously are basing their belief in the product on indirect assumptions also (they have to be!). where is there logic and scientific support?
here are quotes from sldge
The compound is a steroid as is 6-OXO, ATD,4-OHA and both 6b/6a-bromo. They are all steroidal aromatase inhibitors. The question is if 6-bromo has anabolic metabolites that would bind to the androgen receptor causing negative feedback on the HPTA.
here are a few quotes by patrick for food for thought on bromo 6
actually you are right
checking the numbers again i noticed alpha units were in nanograms while beta was micrograms. thousand fold difference between the two
so in that case i revise my opinion and state that 6-bromo seems like a bad choice all around. if the weakly androgenic beta was the stronger i would say there was hope but as you pointed out, its not
i assume hyperdrol contains 6-bromo
well at least you seem to understand what i am talking about
6-bromo appears to be more suitable for use as a prohormone and probably requires PCT afterwards
probably not really strong PCT but PCT regardless
6-bromo is synthetic
my contention has never been that it suppresses. instead i am saying it's probably like formestane, which appears to have a neutral effect on HPTA (or a very weak positive one).
such anecdotal reports as these are so muddied with confounding factors that it has hard to gain much insight into anything. you need some people with normal HPTA function taking the 6-Br as a standalone for a period of time - just like was done in the 6-oxo studies
read more closely and you will see that in that sentence i also said "HPTA stimulating action acheived via its aromatase inhibitory potential"
so yes, i am saying there is suppression going on. but then i am also saying there is stimulation going on. the first is androgen receptor mediated and the second is estrogen receptor mediated
i think their is a counterbalance of effects going on there. But the pro-gonadotropic effect of the AI potential probably weighs more heavy
localized estrogen production in the brain is vital to libido. if you shut down aromatase in the brain then you will affect libido. the literature is abundant with examples of this
still people would be better off with a pure AI in my opinion, as these should be stronger
net effect is probably zero.
this is a mild prohormone with anti-aromatase activities. very similar to formestane. with formestane you can get slight anabolic effects with minimal suppression because the anti-aromatase activity will act to keep the HPTA up to par during cycle - at least to some extent.
It is inarguable that formestane is everything i just said it is, the science is indisputable on that. It is also inarguable that formestane is not nearly as good at stimulating the HPTA as a "clean" anti-aromatase, and therefore a poor choice for PCT. Furthermore, standalone cycles of formestane DO result in "decent gains with little sides" - just like you are saying is seen with 6-bromo
BTW, i dunno why you throw superdrol in there as a point of comparison. It is completely on the other end of the steroid hormone spectrum
let me break this down
nobody knows if this product has substantial sex hormone activity for sure. Not myself, not ######
So the best we can do is look at closely related data and make assumptions. I did that and I presented a strong case that this stuff is more likely than not androgenic and possibly suppressive
You must also assume that #####has decided that it is not suppressive, since they are selling it as PCT.
#####presents no logic for it being not suppressive. no science.
they sell the product not i. they obviously are basing their belief in the product on indirect assumptions also (they have to be!). where is there logic and scientific support?
here are quotes from sldge
The compound is a steroid as is 6-OXO, ATD,4-OHA and both 6b/6a-bromo. They are all steroidal aromatase inhibitors. The question is if 6-bromo has anabolic metabolites that would bind to the androgen receptor causing negative feedback on the HPTA.