Patrick Arnold
Featured Author
clear your pm's mixel
clear your pm's mixel
I'm late to this thread. everything I wanted to say and debate has been debated.![]()
Aw c'mon, there's always more to debate when it comes to Ecdy...![]()
recent study on injectable 20E done here at u of illinois had weird and somewhat dissapointing results
recent study on injectable 20E done here at u of illinois had weird and somewhat dissapointing results
I'm assuming you're referring to this?
Invalid Link Removed
Keywords:
- 20-hydroxyecdysone;
- infusion;
- mice;
- microarray;
- phytoecdysteroids;
- skeletal muscle
Phytoecdysteroids have been attributed with numerous pharmacological properties in animals, including increasing muscle mass, and 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) is one of the most abundant phytoecdysteroids produced by plants. In this study, the physiological and gene expression effects of 20E were analyzed in C57BL/6 mice given a continuous infusion of saline or 20E (5 mg/kg/day) for 5 or 15 days using subcutaneously implanted Alzet® osmotic pumps. The masses of the total body, muscle groups and organs were determined. There was a significant increase ( p = 0.01) in the mass of triceps brachii in mice treated with 20E for 5 days (115 ± 8 mg) compared with mice treated with saline for 5 days (88 ± 3 mg), however, there were no differences in the other measured parameters. To determine potential mechanisms of 20E in skeletal muscle, Illumina's Mouse Whole Genome-6 v2.0 Expression BeadChips were used to evaluate changes in gene expression of the triceps brachii after 20E infusion. Ingenuity Pathways Analysis was used to identify genes with the most evidence for differential expression, of which, 16 genes involved in the skeletal and muscular system were identified. Overall, the data suggest that 20E does not have potent anabolic properties, however, a muscle-specific increase was observed and genes were identified to provide an explanation for the muscle accretion. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Quite interesting, the muscle specific effect observed. I only had time to read the abstract, off to the gym!!!
yeah that one. the question is, was the osmotic pump situated in the vicinity of the triceps brachii?
very odd that just one specific muscle group would grow otherwise
Agree. If so, it would seem to parallel MadRussian's (I think that was his handle) findings/commentary, when pinning an Ecdy homebrew. This is where our little world has something to offer. An avant guard experiment? Perhaps, yet it offers insight into unanswered questions.
If this is in fact the case, it'll just result in more Ecdy questions vs. answers. Still, it illustrates the fact it CAN be anabolic in muscle tissue. We need more studies in humans, given the potential it holds for sarcopenia/muscle wasting in conditions where traditional anabolics are contra-indicated (i.e. prostate cancer). I fully understand they're pursuing SARM's for this, but Ecdy is far less likely to present the unknown/reported side effects SARM's have presented (i.e. transient visual disturbances, etc.).
Exciting stuff...![]()
Do you have a delivery method or modification to ecdy that will actually get it to skeletal muscle in humans?
u mean orally or injectable?
i dont see how one can target ecdy to skeletal muscle by either route. Its gonna go where it wants to go. unless you inject it right into a muscle, but still most of that will diffuse out of the muscle.
I mean orally since injectables aren't really a feasible option in this industry (or are they?), and I don't mean targeting skeletal muscle but rather even reaching the tissue.
i was under the impression that they absorbed in the gut and reached the blood stream in reasonable amounts
I recall reading that radiolabeled ecdy was most prevalent in excretory organs of animals closer in size to humans. Was your research referring to rats?
i got the full text on the 20E infusion.
the triceps got significantly bigger after 5 days but after 15 they shrunk back down. no other muscles or organs showed any changes
big dissapointment
i got the full text on the 20E infusion.
the triceps got significantly bigger after 5 days but after 15 they shrunk back down. no other muscles or organs showed any changes
big dissapointment
Do you have a delivery method or modification to ecdy that will actually get it to skeletal muscle in humans?
No, but I'm not convinced you need one. I believe it builds into the cell membrane, much like fish oil. ..
Maybe it displaces cholesterol in the cell membrane, since cholesterol and ecdysteroids are structurally similar
ecdysteroids are alot more water soluble though. so maybe i am wrong
That's a great theory, I wish we knew if that's what was going on. There's also something going on with Vitamin D, insofar as some studies seem to indicate Ecdy can act as a substitute for it.
vitamin D is a secosteroid. the B and C rings are unformed but the body has enzymes which use those double bonds to finish forming the steroid four ring structure. if you did that to vitamin D you would have a structure pretty similar to cholesterol and ecdysteroids
Explains a lot. Thank you Pat...
Can you recommend a quality company selling ecdy? I have tried it in the past but I did not notice much. I forget what company I used but it seemed like everyone was using a different standardization method.
bigdavid said:Can you recommend a quality company selling ecdy? I have tried it in the past but I did not notice much. I forget what company I used but it seemed like everyone was using a different standardization method.
Can you recommend a quality company selling ecdy? I have tried it in the past but I did not notice much. I forget what company I used but it seemed like everyone was using a different standardization method.
Muscle and Sports Science has been offering quality Ecdysterone extracts since 1993. Ax1 very kindly recommended my product, Mass Pro Synthagen. It's my formula, done under MASS's label. It's brand new, contains Ecdy (amongst MANY complimentary ingredients) and the feedback has exceeded even my expectations. The first two batches sold out fast, and we continue to see great things.
I wrote "The Blueprint" Ebook, which is an optimal use protocol for adaptogens of sorts. Ecdy research figured prominently in its development. It was published just prior to Ebol's release (2nd version of Ebol, if I'm not mistaken). Almost immediately, my guys running BP paired it with Ebol resulting in incredible success. Today, Ebol has perhaps the longest running, successful track record within BP. It too, would be an excellent choice. If it's pure Ecdy/Ecdy heavy formula you're looking for, Ebol would be my recommendation.
I think you'll find source material for Ecdy is a big issue. You can find "Ecdy" for $300/kilo out of China, but it's largely 20-hydroxyecdysterone from the inferior source genus cyanotis vaga. Thermolife goes to the Institute of Chemistry and Plant Sciences in Uzbekistan for their raws/Rhaponticum/Turkesterone.
Says alot, about the quality of Ecdy in Ebol.
bigdavid said:Thank you for the detailed response. I had disregarded ecdy in the past but was not using any of the products that you listed. I am just going to assume that I was not getting quality ecdy and may give it a second shot in the future with one of the products you mentioned.
Thank you for the detailed response. I had disregarded ecdy in the past but was not using any of the products that you listed. I am just going to assume that I was not getting quality ecdy and may give it a second shot in the future with one of the products you mentioned.
If I run mass pro synthagon I will let you know.
Have run it?
It's OOS now.![]()
ax1 said:Not yet but plan to at some point (currently running other things to get out of the way).
I highly respect the formula, Its easy for me to suggest it.
Leuzea Rhaponticum carthamiodes at an effective dose is a great starting point. Its supporting cast of ingredients make it for something special and different from everything else on the market. I trust the company too, I know their raws are legitimate and the highest quality.
If I run mass pro synthagon I will let you know.
I'm going to PM you a training tip, that you can use with a quality Ecdy. This type of training leverages the point I made, about there being a stress necessary, for adaptogens to work optimally.
Sincerely hope it helps you...
Would ecdy be a good product for a 5x5 type style program (or even 531 by Wendler)? Bill Starr's 5x5 for example, if you are familiar with it.
Mixelflick said:Generally speaking, no. I'm going to caveat that though, by saying that for an adaptogen like Ecdy to work optimally - there needs to be a rather profound environmental stress, to adapt to. In the absence of that, adaptogens perform sub-optimally. You also needn't go over-board on the protein, like so many companies will recommend with Ecdy. Fact of the matter is, Ecdy's glucose disposal (and other) properties are as prominent - if not moreso than its effect on protein synthesis.
In the right formula, you can leverage ALL that Ecdy has to offer. For the record, it offers a LOT. Take a gander... See PDF in particular section 7:
Invalid Link Removed
"Effects on vertebrates, including mammals
[*]Effects of exogenous ecdysteroids
[*]Ecdysteroid metabolism in mammals
Tart Cherry Juice with Synthagen....BOOM!!
Yeah, it's quite the experience. When I put Synthagen to the test though, I did so in a unique fashion - did everything I could, to subvert the product. Yep, brought protein DOWN to under 75g/day for weeks at a time. Then brought calories way below maintenance. Deliberately tried to over-train, etc.. I still gained in the gym/lost no muscle. That's when I knew it was ready.
Little wonder then, the slew of positive reviews that have been coming in. The latest was just one such case. He had been ravaged by life, I guess you could say. Here's what went down..
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150, bgcolor: #DEE3E7, align: left"]Mattlaw30
Joined: 30 Apr 2011
Posts: 10
[/TD]
[TD="width: 100%, bgcolor: #DEE3E7"]
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 100%"]Invalid Link RemovedPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 1:29 pm Post subject:
[/TD]
[TD]Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]"This product is amazing. In the last month I have been getting over a cold and stressed out beyond belief due to work. Not sleeping or eating well. My body is probably swimming in cortisol. Despite all of this I have been able to workout and make gains using Synthagen; 5 caps before workout, 5 after and 2 in the morning on off days. Visually my shoulders look different. Wider and you can see striations. I love this product..."
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
So enough about Synthagen...Here's a relevant question - why don't more companies try doing this, prior to bringing a product to market?
As I sit here thinking about it, the BEST products I ever used were ones that seemingly made things "failsafe". You know, they had that eerie similarity to androgens insofar as their ability to make up for certain dietary/training or lifestyle faux pas - and you still did well on them. I'm not talking about gross offenses here, like eating at McDonald's every day or partying until 2AM every night. Just the "life happens" stuff.
Dunno. It just seems to me that it's a good way to go about putting XYZ product to the test.
^^^ So your saying volume is the way to go to induce the stress or something like super & drop sets?
you do have me wanting to try synthagen now....
I think though there are a few reasons that doesn't happen often. For one of course, the supplement companies that are in the advertising in magazines you read, sponsoring serious athletes, etc are in business to make money. Effectiveness of a product often comes quite secondary to ability to sell and make a profit. The less cynical reason is that since they do compete against each other, they have to try and release things rapidly and make changes rapidly to keep from falling behind with their competitors.
You make great points. It just blows my mind that product efficacy comes second to hiring an ad agency, getting some juiced up pro to endorse it and gearing up for methyl 2-test, because methyl 1-test was so "last month".
In my mind, the true test is as follows...
1.) The product generates repeat buys, over a decade or more
2.) The product doesn't need much advertising - it sells itself through word of mouth
I keep seeing "new"! New doesn't mean better. Better is better....![]()