Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Tr1iump and d1methadrol

mixedup said:
A little flat from t3

I don't usually post pics this close but here's a current ab shotInvalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

mixedup said:
Thanks we are on track to be around 5% lots of fasted cardio and low carbs but it's going to pay off
Click to expand...

You are looking pretty good. Cuts are coming in quickly you will be cutting it close to be at 5% for the show at your current pace but it can be done. If this is with no water manipulation and what not I would guess you were around 10-12% right now. Of course that is hard to guess just seeing the front of your core. If legs and back are extremely lean then you may be less. Looking forward to seeing the pics from your practice peak week. One benefit of that will be you may drop extra BF during that process too. You are gong to have some seriuos bricked out abs either way which is going to help make you look leaner from the front.

Just keep doing what you are doing because from where you are right now each lb lost makes a huge difference in your look. Regardless of if you get to 5% you are doing a national qualifier so an honest 5-6% is probably what most guys will have on stage at that level. So the two things I would focus on would be diet and then make sure your posing is nailed! If your posing is good you can dominate someone 1-2% leaner than you just by knowing how to display your physique and them not.
 
I pinched between 9.6 and 10.3% last week wed did 4 seperately 7 point pinches with 2 people doing 2 pinches I have been coming down .75 to 1% a week. Since its been another week of low carbs and fasted and clen got added back in 120mcg daily we are hoping low 9% if the .75 holds for 3 to 4 weeks we will be there.

For posing I'm attending 2 posing seminars plus practicing with my coach weekly and myself daily.

If we don't hit right we have a show 1 week from the sf and then sacramento 3 weeks after will just need to hold condition for a couple weeks
 
mixedup said:
I pinched between 9.6 and 10.3% last week wed did 4 seperately 7 point pinches with 2 people doing 2 pinches I have been coming down .75 to 1% a week. Since its been another week of low carbs and fasted and clen got added back in 120mcg daily we are hoping low 9% if the .75 holds for 3 to 4 weeks we will be there.

For posing I'm attending 2 posing seminars plus practicing with my coach weekly and myself daily.

If we don't hit right we have a show 1 week from the sf and then sacramento 3 weeks after will just need to hold condition for a couple weeks
Click to expand...

Sweet! Like I said if your back, and legs are pretty lean it can change things a bit and is hard to tell from just a core shot. I was thinking 10 if legs and back were pretty lean, and 12 if everything was about the same. I remember seeing separation in your legs a few weeks back so I know your legs are pretty lean.

If you are leaning up at 1% a week you got this 6 weeks at 1% would take you down to 4-ish. I was going by the .75 and the time you had left. With the .75 from 10% you should still come in looking sharp! If you were 12% it would be a require some serious manipulation and work.
 
Gstyle24 said:
So is this similar to epistane, which means chances of gyno rebound?
Click to expand...

jbryand101b said:
That's always a possibility no matter what
Click to expand...

YEP! If it can shut you down you can get estro rebound from it. When estro becomes low due to shut down your body increases aromatase enzymes trying to balance it out but can't do squat with no test. Quit said cycle and test returns in an aromatase flooded system and you have estro rebound. Doesn't matter what other characteristics the compound has, if it can shut you down you can get estro rebound.
 
1kerry said:
so El1minate will avoid this on PCT?
Click to expand...

Yes it would starting at the middle or toward the end of your PCT. No need for it in the beginning unless coming off things with a long half life that aromatize. However if you are using Super PCT there is no need for another AI, it already has the Eliminate in it.
 
MrKleen73 said:
Yes it would starting at the middle or toward the end of your PCT. No need for it in the beginning unless coming off things with a long half life that aromatize. However if you are using Super PCT there is no need for another AI, it already has the Eliminate in it.
Click to expand...

thanks! I have read that its a good idea to start taking it on day 10-15 of a 28 day pct
 
mixedup said:
I pinched between 9.6 and 10.3% last week wed did 4 seperately 7 point pinches with 2 people doing 2 pinches I have been coming down .75 to 1% a week. Since its been another week of low carbs and fasted and clen got added back in 120mcg daily we are hoping low 9% if the .75 holds for 3 to 4 weeks we will be there.

For posing I'm attending 2 posing seminars plus practicing with my coach weekly and myself daily.

If we don't hit right we have a show 1 week from the sf and then sacramento 3 weeks after will just need to hold condition for a couple weeks
Click to expand...

Your making progress, but 6 weeks might be cutting it close at that bf%, visually its look 11-12%. At 4 weeks out, I had a full set of abs with visible serratus and I was only on EC stack. But who knows, maybe all those AAS, T3 and those SARMs can get you there by peak week, something thats beyond my knowledge.
 
zman86 said:
Your making progress, but 6 weeks might be cutting it close at that bf%, visually its look 11-12%. At 4 weeks out, I had a full set of abs with visible serratus and I was only on EC stack. But who knows, maybe all those AAS, T3 and those SARMs can get you there by peak week, something thats beyond my knowledge.
Click to expand...

Yea it might we will see all I can do is stick to the diet and cardio and do my best.
 
MrKleen73 said:
YEP! If it can shut you down you can get estro rebound from it. When estro becomes low due to shut down your body increases aromatase enzymes trying to balance it out but can't do squat with no test. Quit said cycle and test returns in an aromatase flooded system and you have estro rebound. Doesn't matter what other characteristics the compound has, if it can shut you down you can get estro rebound.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the info
 
If people had to pick , which one would you prefer? Tr1umph or d1methadrol, I have a bottle of both
 
YouBet33 said:
If people had to pick , which one would you prefer? Tr1umph or d1methadrol, I have a bottle of both
Click to expand...

Both are great, flip a coin
 
what are the results like with d1methadrol?
 
Methyldiazirinol vs
Dimethandrostenol

Both DHT base and 17a methylated.

From what I gather dimethadrol is a better bulker and is more structurally similar to Sdrol and thus should be more hepatoxic than triumph.

Edit: therefore I'm content with Triumph since I'll be using another methyl compound(tr3st).
 
squirtguns89 said:
no.

have other things on hand just in case of such occurrences.

this is not a shot at OL either, i just bought eliminate.
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't eliminate help avoid estrogen issues in pct?

Back when I used og erase, it worked well controlling estrogen as an addition into my pct.
 
squirtguns89 said:
no.

have other things on hand just in case of such occurrences.

this is not a shot at OL either, i just bought eliminate.
Click to expand...
It should do the job but it is always good practice to have exemestane on hand in case armistane isn't enough. Armistane works pretty good for most situations
 
yates84 plus the cort control alone is worth the addition, im sure he will be g2g, just wanted to error on the side of caution.

hopefully you guys saw my requests in OL request thread lol. already got some nice OL goods for next recovery process.

jbryand101b said:
Why wouldn't eliminate help avoid estrogen issues in pct?

Back when I used og erase, it worked well controlling estrogen as an addition into my pct.
Click to expand...

not going there as i have no issue with the product for what it is. also i didnt suggest scrapping the product though, i simply suggested having stronger stuff on hand just in case....i guess i added my own context vs what he asked.
 
zman86 said:
Methyldiazirinol vs
Dimethandrostenol

Both DHT base and 17a methylated.

From what I gather dimethadrol is a better bulker and is more structurally similar to Sdrol and thus should be more hepatoxic than triumph.

Edit: therefore I'm content with Triumph since I'll be using another methyl compound(tr3st).
Click to expand...
Trest isnt methylated
zman86 said:
Methyldiazirinol vs
Dimethandrostenol

Both DHT base and 17a methylated.

From what I gather dimethadrol is a better bulker and is more structurally similar to Sdrol and thus should be more hepatoxic than triumph.

Edit: therefore I'm content with Triumph since I'll be using another methyl compound(tr3st).
Click to expand...
Trest isnt methylated is it? I know MENT is but not straight trest.
 
Trest is a 7a methyl, it's methylated but there is no real toxicity concern
 
Volvo140G said:
Haven't ran it but is reported to be great for hardening, strength, and lean gains.
Click to expand...

zman86 said:
Methyldiazirinol vs
Dimethandrostenol

Both DHT base and 17a methylated.

From what I gather dimethadrol is a better bulker and is more structurally similar to Sdrol and thus should be more hepatoxic than triumph.

Edit: therefore I'm content with Triumph since I'll be using another methyl compound(tr3st).
Click to expand...

trest isn't a 17 a methyl. different
 
bswanny said:
so d1methadrol is no good or are.ypu stating just side.are mild
Click to expand...

Dimethadrol is a great compound, I ran it last cycle with good results. When he said mild he just meant mild side effects.
 
bswanny said:
trest isn't a 17 a methyl. different
Click to expand...

Yep, trest is a 7a methyl. It also isn't a dht base, trest is a 19 nor like tren
 
yates84 said:
Dimethadrol is a great compound, I ran it last cycle with good results. When he said mild he just meant mild side effects.
Click to expand...

Good to know. Would you compare it to anything like DMZ?
 
YouBet33 said:
If people had to pick , which one would you prefer? Tr1umph or d1methadrol, I have a bottle of both
Click to expand...
Goal dependent...
yates84 said:
Trest is a 7a methyl, it's methylated but there is no real toxicity concern
Click to expand...
This!
bswanny said:
so d1methadrol is no good or are.ypu stating just side.are mild
Click to expand...
No it is great, lots of mass to be gained on it and you can dose it pretty high safely. He was saying it was nowhere near as toxic, not strength wise. I mean strength wise not much is going to touch SD, but dymeth is very myotropic, and gains come easily once they get rolling.
jbryand101b said:
Yup it's one of those compounds you won't dread to run again
Click to expand...

Exactly.
 
B Man said:
d1methadrol is sold out, so would Tr1umph be good for Strength & a lean bulk?
Click to expand...

Yes, perfect for lean bulk/recomp and you will get some good strength gains
 
I'm gonna try to cut 15 pounds on 8 weeks of tr3n and 6 weeks of tr1umph this winter, start off my cut goal of 25-30 pounds
 
How would you guys compare tr1umph to halodrol in terms of strength,size and toxicity? Would be used for a recomp/lean bulk.
 
jbryand101b said:
How would you compare super pump with no explode in terms strength, size, and toxicity?
Click to expand...
They will both have you on the toilet for hours. Very toxic to the a$$.
 
jbryand101b said:
How would you compare super pump with no explode in terms strength, size, and toxicity?
Click to expand...
Super pump should provide a better pump with the higher levels of citrulline and glycerol, no-xplode with the higher amounts of stims and creatine should provide better short term strength gains. Also no-xplode will give you the tingle of beta-alanine if you're into that feeling. More users report GI issues wih super pump giving it the nickname of super dump, so that's something to consider... See how that works? I understand people ask a lot of dumb questions sometimes, but typically I see you providing smart ass answers which all that does is waste your time typing it out. So let me rephrase the question. All things being equal, diet, training etc. How would you compare the two compounds in terms of strength gains, size gains ( glycogen retention,increased protein synthesis) and toxicity (impact on BP, lipids, and liver strain)
 
Both are about equal as far as toxicity is concerned. Triumph will be better at cutting due to its nutrient partitioning abilities where d1m would be the better bulker imo. Strength increase should be similar on both
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top