Superdrol-NG vs Superdrol

I believe Tim has tested both products and knows about each product - but cannot give the information out freely... So, in actually knowing the info one cannot have conflicting remarks based on having the knowledge

Be Cool! :trout:

whitedevil74 said:
You just said no info is available as of yet and then in the same sentence assert that 3AD and SNG would make a great stack, now how the heck do you reconcile two such conflicting statements.
Click to expand...
 
DR.D said:
I can vouch for him, he got to beta test both products so he's qualified to make that assertion.
Click to expand...

Well that makes sense then, Tim dammit you should have said so, the confrontational lawyer in me is always itching for fight. Bad Whitedevil, bad:nono:
 
ImJ2x said:
I would just like to add...
The only reason anyone would "wade through" this entire long, uninformative, "retarded" thread is because it was actually quite entertaining, in the car crash way. (Nobody forced you to read it, man.)
Click to expand...
The problem is you can't tell there's nothing of interest in it unless you read every post. What will happen in the future is that someone will want to know about Superdrol-NG, will try a search, find threads like this, waste hours reading through them and learning nothing, then they'll start a new thread and the first reply will tell them "there's loads of posts about this, use the search function" :frustrate
 
matthew76 said:
LOL - I'm sure Tim's cool with the misunderstanding...
Click to expand...

No problems at all guys. Trust me, sometimes I want to say things so badly it hurts. But, I made a promise not to, and I'm bound by honor to stick to it.

Additionally, for reference, the statement I made about those 2 items stacking nicely together was not based on experience so much as it was from a few posts from AX mods and BigSmith himself answering the same question. It's another case of too many posts and weeding out the good stuff! :thumbsup:

And no hard feelings, lawyer guy! All cool with me! :trout: :D

Thanks Dr. D for backin me up! :D :D :D
 
Boris said:
The problem is you can't tell there's nothing of interest in it unless you read every post. What will happen in the future is that someone will want to know about Superdrol-NG, will try a search, find threads like this, waste hours reading through them and learning nothing, then they'll start a new thread and the first reply will tell them "there's loads of posts about this, use the search function" :frustrate
Click to expand...

I whole-heartedly understand your frustration. Then again, that's why companies here have their own section of the forum. There's always good posts there - better chance of it than in the general sections. On top of that, when AX is concerned, there's always the AX forum itself where most everybody who frequents it can provide excellent information - both from experience and from collective knowledge. :lol:
 
Boris said:
The problem is you can't tell there's nothing of interest in it unless you read every post. What will happen in the future is that someone will want to know about Superdrol-NG, will try a search, find threads like this, waste hours reading through them and learning nothing, then they'll start a new thread and the first reply will tell them "there's loads of posts about this, use the search function" :frustrate
Click to expand...
That's a somewhat valid (if unrealistic) point. But I didn't hijack this thread -- someone else brought up the question of marketing. I just added my $.02 worth (more like a nickel, I know). But I'm sorry if you feel I wasted your time. I guess I could have started a new thread specifically about my objection to the naming/marketing decisions. I'll save that for their next product.
Just kidding, fellas! :p
 
Well, not to sound like a smart ass and say "I told you so"...

but...

There's several threads popping up on different bodybuilding forums now that SDNG's ingredient list has been revealed. And wow, people are not being very nice to AX at all...
 
Dalamara said:
Well, not to sound like a smart ass and say "I told you so"...

but...

There's several threads popping up on different bodybuilding forums now that SDNG's ingredient list has been revealed. And wow, people are not being very nice to AX at all...
Click to expand...

What are the primary objections that you observe these people to make?
 
Dalamara said:
Well, not to sound like a smart ass and say "I told you so"...

but...

There's several threads popping up on different bodybuilding forums now that SDNG's ingredient list has been revealed. And wow, people are not being very nice to AX at all...
Click to expand...

Eh, it happens. Anytime something good comes out, people just have to blast away with their opinions because it might just be better than something they whole-heartedly support. It's a shame there's so many who hate instead of trying...thusly the "put up or shut up" thing we've got going on right now (see other thread SDNG sucks...). The way I see things, folks have a right to say whatever they like. No biggy. Think what you want to think. But those who try the product(s) will think otherwise. The whole bashing thing is just stupid...

And should you see an AX-bashing thread where an AX rep doesn't say anything, it's more likely that it just isn't worth it. We're not snobby, just too busy lifting and getting ripped to respond!
 
I will admit that i'm not a fan of the naming, but I am very much waiting to see a few specific logs. SDNG does have some good potential, and I think a little contrary to the norm it may work even better in some of the older members than younger. It definitely won't be an original superdrol on gains, but it won't suck your HDL into single digits or make your liver crawl out and cry either. I'm going to wait till the solo logs are done before I make any sort of judgement. I'm open to running a full cycle myself if it pans out.
 
Older members?! What are tryin' to say E? :D J/K

Yes, it was designed to be an extremely versatile and self-contained supplement, but that is certainly a legitimate specific application (us old tymers :rolleyes: )

As for the name, I guess that's just a marketing thing. I am not wise in that area or a business man by any means so I could only speculate, but thanks for the constructive input E. I appreciate it!
 
DR.D said:
What are the primary objections that you observe these people to make?
Click to expand...

I was poking around myself on a number of sites, and found these two threads as pretty good representatives of conversations on other boards too. Hopefully this isn't a violation of rules to link there.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Theres some objection to the naming similar to what was raised in some threads here, and although I don't agree some bashing of the specific ingredients as well. Those two seem to be pretty indicative of threads scattered around about it. The naming is what it is. I now drive a 2006 Dodge Charger Daytona (in Go Mango) and previously have had a 1970 Charger in Burnt Orange Metallic. In a lot of ways, I wish Dodge had used Polara or one of their other 4 door car names and reserved the Charger monicker for one more like the original... But it also didn't stop me from buying a well equipped 355hp 4 door car for $32k :D

Its definitely a pity that so many seem to be unwilling to wait until real world results are back before condemning a product.
 
EasyEJL said:
The naming is what it is. I now drive a 2006 Dodge Charger Daytona (in Go Mango) and previously have had a 1970 Charger in Burnt Orange Metallic. In a lot of ways, I wish Dodge had used Polara or one of their other 4 door car names and reserved the Charger monicker for one more like the original... But it also didn't stop me from buying a well equipped 355hp 4 door car for $32k :D
Click to expand...

Exactly!! That's precisely the analogy I was going to use. I hope people remember that when the name thing comes up. Similarly, they should remember that the new Charger also gets better gas mileage, has better emmissions, and comes with more comfortable options than it did back in the day.

Original = Brute Muscle, NG = Powerful Sophistication

With that, I suggest the new tag line: SDNG - yeah, it's got a hemi... :D :rofl:
 
timdull2 said:
Exactly!! That's precisely the analogy I was going to use. I hope people remember that when the name thing comes up. Similarly, they should remember that the new Charger also gets better gas mileage, has better emmissions, and comes with more comfortable options than it did back in the day.

Original = Brute Muscle, NG = Powerful Sophistication

With that, I suggest the new tag line: SDNG - yeah, it's got a hemi... :D :rofl:
Click to expand...

nice... you get props for that... booyaaah!
 
timdull2 said:
Exactly!! That's precisely the analogy I was going to use. I hope people remember that when the name thing comes up. Similarly, they should remember that the new Charger also gets better gas mileage, has better emmissions, and comes with more comfortable options than it did back in the day.

Original = Brute Muscle, NG = Powerful Sophistication

With that, I suggest the new tag line: SDNG - yeah, it's got a hemi... :D :rofl:
Click to expand...

Pity tho, no stickshift available nowadays, the older one was a 4 speed :)
 
EasyEJL said:
I was poking around myself on a number of sites, and found these two threads as pretty good representatives of conversations on other boards too. Hopefully this isn't a violation of rules to link there.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Theres some objection to the naming similar to what was raised in some threads here, and although I don't agree some bashing of the specific ingredients as well. Those two seem to be pretty indicative of threads scattered around about it. The naming is what it is. I now drive a 2006 Dodge Charger Daytona (in Go Mango) and previously have had a 1970 Charger in Burnt Orange Metallic. In a lot of ways, I wish Dodge had used Polara or one of their other 4 door car names and reserved the Charger monicker for one more like the original... But it also didn't stop me from buying a well equipped 355hp 4 door car for $32k :D

Its definitely a pity that so many seem to be unwilling to wait until real world results are back before condemning a product.
Click to expand...
:goodpost: I gotta spread it before repping you! :frustrate

Maybe timmay can get the job done! THAT WAS AN EXCELLENT POST!
 
:P I'm gonna have to spread it around first, too! I'm starting to feel like a rep whore... Atleast I'm a giver! :rofl:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top