You have not proven that genetics do not play a part in the results of your training and or which method of training may be ideal for you.
thats cause i have not tried to, nor will i. i will hold by my statement that genetics as you have defined them plays such a minor role, and that the mechanisms as i have stated, are the same from person to person so they make such a greater part of the variables to determine what works and does work that your genetics just dont matter. it would be analogous to saying that drinking orange juice over grape juice is better. i ask better for what? and by how much? a significant amount? enough of an amount that different people can measure the same results in the same and different people with enough accuracy to be considered viable..... i say not. again, majoring in the minors.
Let me make sure I understand your stance here. Are you saying genetics has nothing to do with how your body responds to training.
nope. you stated here:
What about the Origin and Insertion points of muscle is that not genetically controlled either?
i responded and you even quoted:
now does leverages make a difference, sure they do.
which if you may have missed. was my reference to your insertion/origin point. that was an interpretation of the intent of that which i stated as leverages. which insertion and original points do directly affect leverages, thank you physics.
So if I take 2 untrained people with very different genetic traits, let's just say one can naturally run distance pretty easily, but is not very fast in sprinting, can't lift a lot of weight but can do a lot of reps with low-moderate weight. Then take someone who is not a great endurance runner, but is a naturally fast sprinter, is extremely explosive, and can lift a lot of weight. Then train them both the same way that they would get the same results in strength and muscle mass gains because the mechanisms of training are the same so the adaptation should be the same therefore the results would be identical if genetics were not a factor.
do you think they would get the same results? i am guessing you would think no. and you would be correct. but not for the reason you think. the mechanisms behind muscle stimulus and adaptation are the same between them, therefore they will both respond to the training. training age can allow for varying effect. so can age, sex, hormone levels, nutrition, sleep and stress habits. much more so than your defined genetics.
training age being a huge part here especially with their type of training. a marathoner trains like a marathoner and therefore does not have 1RM absolute strength of a sprinter, and sprinter does not have the endurance capacity of the marathoner. we know from research that type 2b fibers can change their main focus. now you may think that is genetics, but that is a mechanism. therefore they will get different results and not because of genetics but due to training age, past training, and likely actual age and hormonal levels, and even possibly sex and actual age. all of which have a much greater impact on training than your defined genetics.
to wrap up, someone can train to be more specific and someone can train to have more endurance. then they can switch to train for the other. as their training age increases per their specific training that has a great effect on training. and in no way am i saying genetics dont have an effect, just not in they way you seem to keep thinking and stating.
now back to the OP, this is a great discussion as well as some other posts to maybe help your answer. both can help. training age, hormone leves, sleep, nutrition, and belief in the program can have an effect of which is better.