Ahh. Sorry, i wrote a lot and wasn't sure what exactly you were talking about there.
And, eh, I don't necessarily think a "good" chiro HAS to massage or even have an infrared laser in the office. Those modalities aren't indicated for every patient. A good chiro is able to take what the patient is saying and adapt their treatment course depending on what the patient's history is, what their exam findings are (and actually knowing what the hell they are doing when examining a patient), and what the patient is comfortable with both physically and monetarily. Direct treatments such as ART, massage, graston, etc all have their places but sometimes indirect options such as TENS/IF therapy, traction, postural restoration via muscle activation/strengthenin, etc is all the patient really needs secondarily to the manipulation. Some patients only need a manipulation once a week and feel fine solely with that, so is a chiropractor that performs massage for 3 minutes before the manipulation just so he can bill for it a better chiro than a chiro that skips the "massage" because the patient doesn't need it? I dont think so.