7a-methyl-D-bol (7a-17a-DiMethandrostenolone) maybe on it's way to the market

jherman08 said:
Its obvious the penn state assistant coach was abusing...
Click to expand...

Oh man that's the same one I was thinking of then. I want some!
 
Its barely been talked about... dunno if its even possible to get the raws made yet and then they will have to run testing both to make sure its legit and real world beta to make sure it works at a cost effective dose without tearing you apart...
 
right now they are buying the raws ans starting the R&D so lets hope they can do it. we are looking ate around if happens probably 3-4 months




Sourdough said:
Its barely been talked about... dunno if its even possible to get the raws made yet and then they will have to run testing both to make sure its legit and real world beta to make sure it works at a cost effective dose without tearing you apart...
Click to expand...
 
the future looks good indeed
 
Nice.. Hoping we will still see ment reach mainstream as well... Been looking for that to hit for a long time and tester logs showed solid results... Would be so nice to have a wet non methyl besides lmg, something closer to test...
 
Sourdough said:
Nice.. Hoping we will still see ment reach mainstream as well... Been looking for that to hit for a long time and tester logs showed solid results... Would be so nice to have a wet non methyl besides lmg, something closer to test...
Click to expand...

Sure would :-p
 
Sourdough said:
Nice.. Hoping we will still see ment reach mainstream as well... Been looking for that to hit for a long time and tester logs showed solid results... Would be so nice to have a wet non methyl besides lmg, something closer to test...
Click to expand...

that would be soo good. It would probably be banned in days....
 
interested as well.........have fresh receptors and would love to log for you guys.........free or not
 
This is actually a hormone that would make me interested in running a designer again.
 
zendog said:
Have always been curious about the euphoric felling when talking about d-bol. Would def jump on this
Click to expand...

6 years ago, i loved the stuff, and makes you eat clean because ur jacked all day long as long as its split dose.......taken with food......

a lil rough on the liver and kidneys so keep dose around 40-50mg
 
Very cool. I've wanted to see some 7a methyl modifications brought to market for a while now. It's a much more potent alteration when applied to 19-nors than C19's like testosterone, such as in the case of MENT. So this and MENTdione would be two nice additions to the market using the 7a methyl alteration, one from the 19-nor family, and the other from the C19 family.

I'd love to see some 14-dehydro compounds. This modification results in increased localized androgenicity. While on the other hand, the 7a methyl alteration enhances systemic androgenicity. 14-dehydrotestosterone and 14-dehydro-19-nortestosterone were both found to be potent androgens, and as is the case with 7a methylation, is a more potent alteration when applied to 19-nors. These were also found to be topically effective. When both the 7a methyl and 14-dehydro modifications were used together, the combination was nOtably synergistic.

7a-methyl-14-dehydro-19-nortestosterone is apparently extremely potent but for whatever reason it was difficult to demonstrate this potency off paper in vivo. A topically applied 14-dehydro product sounds like it might be worth some investigation though...
 
SeanyK said:
I'd love to see some 14-dehydro compounds. This modification results in increased localized androgenicity. While on the other hand, the 7a methyl alteration enhances systemic androgenicity. 14-dehydrotestosterone and 14-dehydro-19-nortestosterone were both found to be potent androgens, and as is the case with 7a methylation, is a more potent alteration when applied to 19-nors. These were also found to be topically effective.
Click to expand...

In the chick comb assay, IIRC, not in people.
 
henryv said:
In the chick comb assay, IIRC, not in people.
Click to expand...


Yea those chicks are some lucky mofos aren't they...


I barely use designers anymore, especially 17a methyls. I'll reach into my pre 2010 ban stash for some halodrol or epi from time to time. That being said I'd much rather use compounds like that in injectable form... Still think it's awesome to see some of these rarer novel compounds brought back from the dead
 
Omg is all I have to say OMG

I used Dianabol at 50 mgs for five weeks- pumped around the clock insane strength gains and amazing size gains


When this comes out- I will seriously buy 10 bottles OMG
 
I found legal dbol in my muscle and fitness magazine today. No longer interested in this!!! :-p
 
most expensive Trib ever!
 
SeanyK said:
Very cool. I've wanted to see some 7a methyl modifications brought to market for a while now. It's a much more potent alteration when applied to 19-nors than C19's like testosterone, such as in the case of MENT. So this and MENTdione would be two nice additions to the market using the 7a methyl alteration, one from the 19-nor family, and the other from the C19 family.

I'd love to see some 14-dehydro compounds. This modification results in increased localized androgenicity. While on the other hand, the 7a methyl alteration enhances systemic androgenicity. 14-dehydrotestosterone and 14-dehydro-19-nortestosterone were both found to be potent androgens, and as is the case with 7a methylation, is a more potent alteration when applied to 19-nors. These were also found to be topically effective. When both the 7a methyl and 14-dehydro modifications were used together, the combination was nOtably synergistic.

7a-methyl-14-dehydro-19-nortestosterone is apparently extremely potent but for whatever reason it was difficult to demonstrate this potency off paper in vivo. A topically applied 14-dehydro product sounds like it might be worth some investigation though...
Click to expand...

14 dehydro androgens didnt have the good anabolic/androgenic ratio that researchers were looking for so they never were developed. which means efficient production technology probably was never developed. which means you wont see anyone making the stuff cuz it would be too difficult and expensive, and too much of a learning curve
 
Where's it at?
 
wouldn't be so sure, just cuz we haven't heard anything, doesn't mean it is not possibly a future product ;)
 
ConcreteConny said:
wouldn't be so sure, just cuz we haven't heard anything, doesn't mean it is not possibly a future product ;)
Click to expand...

this stuff would probably be manufactured from bolasterone. i suppose the issue of the finished product containing residual bolasterone (a controlled substance) may be significant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top