They never bought it, more like were goin to "lease it". That is untill something happened the deal was off. Trust me when I say Eric had perfected Dermacrine and that the likelyhood that N2bm could duplicate it is slim at best.You still make it? I thought Need2 bought it and "changed" it to Transaderm? Using a different carrier? Or am I mistaken?
I know alot about ph but not this, help?
They never bought it, more like were goin to "lease it". That is untill something happened the deal was off. Trust me when I say Eric had perfected Dermacrine and that the likelyhood that N2bm could duplicate it is slim at best.
Rs-Transderm is the way to go here....as TheDarkHalf said, more than double the serving size of the old version, with a much better carrier than the old version....basically NTBM has taken two downfalls to a product and improved them....$52.99, but if you use our discount of needto139 you'll save 15% which makes the product roughly $45 and free shipping
Will you be updating with ingredient profile and description anytime soon, or better yet post profile here.
the likelyhood that N2bm could duplicate it is slim at best.
well we did
? Have you used it? Has anyone actually ran it? I get that reps are supposed to represent the company they work for, but I respect them a lot more when they are talking about something they have experience. Maybe you have, but last I knew many of the NTBM reps were unsure about it's status and certainly haven't used enough of it to have an opinion on the product. I know reps are usually biased by nature, but c'mon.
Again this isn't to say that it's garbage or not going to work, but can we hold off about the success of the "duplication" until people have actually used it?
A few have used it.
It is the same carrier as Forma-stanzol and another product we were testing with MLMG & Halodrol TD called Methoxy. Some reputable members tested it and loved the carrier. EasyEJL was asking for the carrier alone.
If you have tried the Forma or were a tester for Methoxy you will know what we're talking about.
Fair enough. I was under the impression this just got released and nobody had used it. I just get personally bothered by people making comments on something they haven't used before![]()
? Have you used it? Has anyone actually ran it? I get that reps are supposed to represent the company they work for, but I respect them a lot more when they are talking about something they have experience. Maybe you have, but last I knew many of the NTBM reps were unsure about it's status and certainly haven't used enough of it to have an opinion on the product. I know reps are usually biased by nature, but c'mon.
Again this isn't to say that it's garbage or not going to work, but can we hold off about the success of the "duplication" until people have actually used it?
but it has to compete with the Androseries wich is basically Dermacrine's predecessor.
I respectfully disagree. These are two very different types of products, so I don't see them competing.
Yeah i'm not sure how the Androseries is Dermacrine's predecessor. Apples to Oranges. Care to elaborate Rulk? I just want a better understanding. Thanks!
I meant the Androseries is Dermacrine's successor ( whoops! I was thinking of that this morning ).I think he meant Dermacrine is the Androseries predecessor. Andro can't be Dermacrine's predecessor as Derm was before Andro.
I meant the Androseries is Dermacrine's successor ( whoops! I was thinking of that this morning ).