Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

LV products - Sort of disappointed :o(

Whacked

Whacked

Well-known member
Disclaimer: I am a HUGE fan of PPP products

That said: As excited as I was to see PP begin to launch a line of LV-technology-based products, I am very disappointed to see recent releases of LV products (SD+Turinabol for example) are methylated!

WHY? I thought the entire fundamental principle of LV and equal appeal for the user was superior ORAL bioavailibility while avoiding the need for TOXIC methylated 17-aa versions.

I look forward to your response
Thanks PP
 
I don't think that the reason behind LV technology was to avoid liver toxicity...they produced products that the general public (meaning on these open forums) wanted...and why not produce something that was requested seeing it as in a business stand point of view as long as the products are legal to sell?
 
Whacked said:
Disclaimer: I am a HUGE fan of PPP products

That said: As excited as I was to see PP begin to launch a line of LV-technology-based products, I am very disappointed to see recent releases of LV products (SD+Turinabol for example) are methylated!

WHY? I thought the entire fundamental principle of LV and equal appeal for the user was superior ORAL bioavailibility while avoiding the need for TOXIC methylated 17-aa versions.

I look forward to your response
Thanks PP
Click to expand...

It allows for dosing flexibility ( having them in liquid form) which a ton of people wanted.

they have a product suggestion thread at PP's home site. You can suggest products YOU think would make good LV products there.
 
well regardless of methylation it still helps with absorption...even tho a product is methylated doesnt mean your getting the full potential out of the compound....maybe im wrong here???
 
if they weren't methylated they'd act completely different in the body... granted i wouldn't mind having an oral version of masteron lol
 
They have formestane LV and they said that Fura LV is a possibility so that would give you a few more options.
 
I agree with everyone above, the LV technology was specifically designed to improve bioavailability, so that trainees could be confident that they were getting an exact dosage of the compound ingested.

From a hepatotoxicity standpoint, no we couldn't necessarily make certain compounds less toxic due to methylation, but the LV technology allows you to dose certain compounds lower (e.g. SD) therefore reducing the liver toxicity overall.

I think you should also post in the suggestion thread too, it would be great to have your feedback.
 
I agree with everyone above, the LV technology was specifically designed to improve bioavailability, so that trainees could be confident that they were getting an exact dosage of the compound ingested.

From a hepatotoxicity standpoint, no we couldn't necessarily make certain compounds less toxic due to methylation, but the LV technology allows you to dose certain compounds lower (e.g. SD) therefore reducing the liver toxicity overall.

I think you should also post in the suggestion thread too, it would be great to have your feedback.
 
i think a non-methyl version of superdrol couldn't be absorbed orally (since the liver would destroy it), so it would have to be dosed rectally. i'd hate to see the "logs".

man, i've been waiting to use that pun.
 
suncloud said:
i think a non-methyl version of superdrol couldn't be absorbed orally (since the liver would destroy it), so it would have to be dosed rectally. i'd hate to see the "logs".

man, i've been waiting to use that pun.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know what you mean, that doesn't mean I can't dream of a world where steroids aren't destroyed in the liver haha one shot of test would last you basically until it expired in your blood in my world... and suppression would be no problem:439:
 
Rectally, huh... That would require a different dropper.
 
fightbackhxc said:
well regardless of methylation it still helps with absorption...even tho a product is methylated doesnt mean your getting the full potential out of the compound....maybe im wrong here???
Click to expand...

I agree totally here. The methylation allows the aas to pass through the liver. It still has to be absorbed once ingested. This is why I don't understand why people suggest u don't need to take methyl aas with fats. Fat hepls the absorption of any hormone. This is why LV tech is still helpful even with methyl aas.
 
bulldogz said:
I don't think that the reason behind LV technology was to avoid liver toxicity...they produced products that the general public (meaning on these open forums) wanted...and why not produce something that was requested seeing it as in a business stand point of view as long as the products are legal to sell?
Click to expand...

Although this may be what people want continued production of PH's will eventully give the feds all the fuel they need to regulate the industry. Companies should be focusing on making effective and safe natural supplements. If the industry won't self regulate the government will.
 
BBB said:
Although this may be what people want continued production of PH's will eventully give the feds all the fuel they need to regulate the industry. Companies should be focusing on making effective and safe natural supplements. If the industry won't self regulate the government will.
Click to expand...

The government does regulate and they will eventually, but until then...PP produces products which are not illegal or banned, plus they preach on how to do proper pct after each cycle.

So basically they say, we will make "x product" but please take "y product" which we made specifically for "x product" to recover nicely and you maybe able avoid certain meds and/or research chems you get on the black market.

I've seen many people take methylated or certain compounds and not take a SERM in pct and recover nicely.
 
bulldogz said:
The government does regulate and they will eventually, but until then...PP produces products which are not illegal or banned, plus they preach on how to do proper pct after each cycle.

So basically they say, we will make "x product" but please take "y product" which we made specifically for "x product" to recover nicely and you maybe able avoid certain meds and/or research chems you get on the black market.

I've seen many people take methylated or certain compounds and not take a SERM in pct and recover nicely.
Click to expand...

I've never used a serm, my balls function fine:hitit:
 
UKStrength said:
I agree with everyone above, the LV technology was specifically designed to improve bioavailability, so that trainees could be confident that they were getting an exact dosage of the compound ingested.

From a hepatotoxicity standpoint, no we couldn't necessarily make certain compounds less toxic due to methylation, but the LV technology allows you to dose certain compounds lower (e.g. SD) therefore reducing the liver toxicity overall.

I think you should also post in the suggestion thread too, it would be great to have your feedback.
Click to expand...

Ya, the purpose was to make a PH be absorbed more. Like a pill is only 50% absorbed and the LV is like 90% absorbed. Thats why i love PP.
 
The ability to dictate your own dosage alone is worth the liquid transport system. The fact that it supposedly absorbs better is a bonus.
 
Harry Manback said:
The ability to dictate your own dosage alone is worth the liquid transport system. The fact that it supposedly absorbs better is a bonus.
Click to expand...

I'm just speculating, but even if it doesn't absorb much better it probably absorbs quicker since there is no capsule and it's liquid. If that is the case then it works very well for dosing Superdrol pre workout.
 
n87 said:
Rectally, huh... That would require a different dropper.
Click to expand...

Hmm, what's the difference between an oral and a rectal dropper???
<Plz Scroll Down>



























THE TASTE!!!! :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top