Not quite... When I used to lifeguard, I would have plenty random a-ss hotties throw me their numbers looking for a "good time" per say.. Now, get this, I didnt have to spit game, or even make a pass at them. I had my shirt off and my eyes are piercing.. I was tan as hell and pumped all the time; as I would come out of the gym and head straight to the pool I was lifeguarding at. I have a fast car, brand new and people always assume I have an hardass attitude, until they get to know me... The point is, "most" girls are shallow and yes, they love the "bad boy" persona...
Do you also scream at your mother: "Mom, where is my PROOOOTEEEIN!?" "****ing skanks."
Your assuming that the women are attracted to them because of the 'bad boy' image. It is more likely they are attracted to them for other reasons. I suggest you look into what triggers attraction mechanisms for women if you want an answer. Although it seems from your post you have just decided you don't like a certain 'type' of person and feel like having a go at them. Personally it doesn't bother me because I can out play and out game a lot of guys regardless of what tshirt they wear or how 'tough' they think they are.
This is precisely it: while one cannot discount cultural factors entirely - that is, "wealth," "status," "power," and so on that are invariably tied up with certain manners of dress, speech, mannerisms and the like - the attraction to the "bad boy" is most likely rooted in something deeper altogether. It is not the case that "Property X" and "manner of dress p" possess some innate, inexplicable quality that attracts females to them. Rather, these possessions, or more appropriately put, the ability to obtain these possessions, is a representation of the biological status of the male: males who are able to obtain these things clearly seem able to provide, protect and secure the livelihood of potential mates - they are mere reflections of a deeper status and ability. It just so, that in this instance, these 'things' happen to be consumed up within something you find culturally and socially distasteful.
The fact remains that the manner of dress, in itself, remains entirely contingent - which is to say, secondary, changing, and unnecessary. Women across generations are invariably attracted to similar males, despite the alterations in dress, speech and mannerisms, because all these things represent this deeper, and indeed more necessary, biological factor to attraction. Again, that certain culturally-annoying symbols become attached to this biological mechanism over time is highly irrelevant. I would also say that there is no "type of girl," in the sense that phrase is being used here, that is attracted to this "type of guy."
p: <--jake
onder:
