For comparison purposes, the Wright State University study on the original MassFX done last year will give a good indicator for the ingredients relative in the current MFX. Using that as well as other published studies might be a half-way decent indicator of which one is more suitable for your needs. That study can be found if you go to the MFX page under the "AX Arsenal" portion of our website.
I'm assuming that the reason for the question boils down to trying to choose the best bang for the buck for yourself, no? From a personal standpoint, believing heavily in the difference between each individual, I think that seeing a group of panels from multiple users here would still not be a great indicator of which would work best for you. What's best on paper doesn't always reflect what's best for the individual. One must do personal experimentation in order to find that out.