Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Stocks

ax1 said:
My Sundial started out hot, not nearly as much as Tilray but wondering if this is all across weed stocks again?
Click to expand...

Tilray turning a profit was big big news for them specifically. But might prove that all of the pot stocks have a chance to turn a profit eventually, lifting all boats to some degree. I am split with some shares of both Tilday and Sundial
 
ax1 said:
My Sundial started out hot, not nearly as much as Tilray but wondering if this is all across weed stocks again?
Click to expand...
seems like whole sector (majority) is booming today
 
Invalid Link Removed

TITLE:
Citadel would buy Robinhood if regulators crack down on this one money-maker: Interactive Brokers founder
 
GQdaLEGEND said:
Invalid Link Removed

TITLE:
Citadel would buy Robinhood if regulators crack down on this one money-maker: Interactive Brokers founder
Click to expand...

if citadel buys RH only bc govt can crack down on RH .. isnt this a slap on the face and basically saying govt/sec wont do anything to citadel ?
 
GQdaLEGEND said:
if citadel buys RH only bc govt can crack down on RH .. isnt this a slap on the face and basically saying govt/sec wont do anything to citadel ?
Click to expand...
Government is doing what they can to protect the market overall, which means its protecting citadel and other large hedgefunds. So Citadel probably won't get in trouble. Citadel is going to have to pay up, but the government is putting things in order to ensure their survival, and the survival of the market. A managed squeeze.
 
Try to make sure you get your AMC vote in today, mostly so they can get a better retail investor count. Today is the last day.
 
ax1 said:
Try to make sure you get your AMC vote in today, mostly so they can get a better retail investor count. Today is the last day.
Click to expand...
Yeah, have no confidence in that. Only a fraction of the people signed up for the AMC Investor Connect, like a very small fraction, and it's real easy to do. So my assumption is only a all fraction will vote.
 
ValiantThor08 said:
Yeah, have no confidence in that. Only a fraction of the people signed up for the AMC Investor Connect, like a very small fraction, and it's real easy to do. So my assumption is only a all fraction will vote.
Click to expand...

I dunno, last time they were able to account for 80% of the shareholders being retail. If I understood everything correct that was based off of vote but maybe Im wrong?
 
ax1 said:
I dunno, last time they were able to account for 80% of the shareholders being retail. If I understood everything correct that was based off of vote but maybe Im wrong?
Click to expand...
I thought so too, but I thought that number was not accurate, and many others thought so.
 
ValiantThor08 said:
I thought so too, but I thought that number was not accurate, and many others thought so.
Click to expand...

If I remember correctly alot of international traders werent even included, so the number may have been more.

Who knows if they are telling the truth, I never saw the audit. Maybe retail investor owns 180% LMFAO and they didnt want to set a nuke off???
 
ax1 said:
If I remember correctly alot of international traders werent even included, so the number may have been more.

Who knows if they are telling the truth, I never saw the audit. Maybe retail investor owns 180% LMFAO and they didnt want to set a nuke off???
Click to expand...
I understand AA as CEO doesn't want to stir the pot to jeopardize AMC, or his standing with the company by "defending a squeeze".
 
Last edited:
ValiantThor08 said:
Look into grants if your realtor has not already. There are many things available to help with closing costs.
Click to expand...
Didn't even know about the armed forces housing fund! Problem is, almost no chance we'll qualify. Not done researching yet though. Regardless, I still want amc to squeeze now lol.
 
GreenMachineX said:
Didn't even know about the armed forces housing fund! Problem is, almost no chance we'll qualify. Not done researching yet though. Regardless, I still want amc to squeeze now lol.
Click to expand...
Yeah, now would be nice. It's inevitable, and will be here before we know it. The days have been flying by.
 
Last edited:
BamBam54 said:
Robinhood just went public as an IPO. Dropping like a stone... LOL

Apparently apes don't forgive or forget
Click to expand...

$33bil evaluation .. crazy hope it goes to $0
 
AA said he would be on the offensive, so what the heck is this about making the share count private..

Invalid Link Removed
 
ValiantThor08 said:
AA said he would be on the offensive, so what the heck is this about making the share count private..

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Thats my concern for sure, we had this share count last time but I didnt actually see anything, not even an excel file...some audit papers? Anything other than a tweet?

Im wondering what the legalities would be on Mr. Popcorn if he has some crazy count, put it out, and then he gets hit with market manipulation? Probably not, but maybe....this was planned anyways I think the right thing to do is to have this public instead of behind closed doors. Or maybe, SEC warned them not to do it? I dont think we will ever know.
 
In regards to "HOOD"....if there is any good news out of this is the education people are getting in the stock market today, with articles on mainstream fake news bringing orderflow through shytadel to light. Stuff that Lou has been talking about for months now.

Invalid Link Removed
 
"A trading app that doesnt allow trading is not an app. Its is malware" LMFAO TRUTH!

Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
Thats my concern for sure, we had this share count last time but I didnt actually see anything, not even an excel file...some audit papers? Anything other than a tweet?

Im wondering what the legalities would be on Mr. Popcorn if he has some crazy count, put it out, and then he gets hit with market manipulation? Probably not, but maybe....this was planned anyways I think the right thing to do is to have this public instead of behind closed doors. Or maybe, SEC warned them not to do it? I dont think we will ever know.
Click to expand...
I think it's pretty obvious at this point that retail owns over 100 percent of the shares. Imagine the uproar if that was public. Is it private to protect market integrity? Most likely. The fact that it's hidden confirms my feelings. Either way, I think everyone's reaction will continue to buy more synthetics and hold.
 
“The ball truly is in retail’s court, especially right now”

-Roensch Capital

Invalid Link Removed
 
Going to get interesting. Quite hilarious watching more fake shares get bought, and the power citadel has to keep the price down. It's almost like the market makers are rigging the stock market against everyone except their own company. That isn't a 1 percent problem, that's like a .1 percent problem. Boy oh boy do I pray they reap what they have sown soon.Invalid Link Removed
 
265 million votes right? Not 265 million voters? So 265 million votes would be 265 million shares. So if you take a market cap of about $20 billion currently divided by 265 million shares that should be $75 per share which we clearly aren't there. If this math is correct this is the first time I have ever actually seen a "fake price".
 
Jensing said:
265 million votes right? Not 265 million voters? So 265 million votes would be 265 million shares. So if you take a market cap of about $20 billion currently divided by 265 million shares that should be $75 per share which we clearly aren't there. If this math is correct this is the first time I have ever actually seen a "fake price".
Click to expand...
It's saying 265 million voted. Average shares per person is 100, not 1 share. AMC is going to squeeze.
 
Jensing said:
265 million votes right? Not 265 million voters? So 265 million votes would be 265 million shares. So if you take a market cap of about $20 billion currently divided by 265 million shares that should be $75 per share which we clearly aren't there. If this math is correct this is the first time I have ever actually seen a "fake price".
Click to expand...
Also, are you Kenny G?! The Kenny G?!

Pleasure to have you here at Anabolic Minds :)
 
Wow. AA has confirmed since June there was no official shares issued. Without confirming synthetics, he is confirming synthetics.Invalid Link Removed
 
Jensing said:
265 million votes right? Not 265 million voters? So 265 million votes would be 265 million shares. So if you take a market cap of about $20 billion currently divided by 265 million shares that should be $75 per share which we clearly aren't there. If this math is correct this is the first time I have ever actually seen a "fake price".
Click to expand...

I had 4 independent vote invites each for all 4 of my accounts I hold shares in.

A votes doesn’t equate to a single share, I think the average holder last time held 120 shares.
 
BamBam54 said:
Plus, how many Owners didn't even vote? I know I didn't get a chance to vote... more to add to the math.
Click to expand...

Also account I think last time a lot of international voters weren’t a part of the count.
 
I heard a Reddit poster from the Netherlands or near there say he had to pay $50 to get his vote in.
 
I jumped on the AMC wagon in May so I don't have the same amount of research. It can squeeze even based on my math so I'm not saying it won't, that's the only reason I'm invested. I just want honest info which I think both sides are throwing out lies at this point.

How I read that screenshot is you have votes for, against, and non votes. The non votes would count anyone that didn't vote. I would assume you get 1 vote per share otherwise I have the same say as Blackrock. So if that's the case it's 256 million shares. Again I could be missing something, but even if you assume I'm right the share price should be at least double what it is currently.
 
Ok based on AA's tweet I was right that 256 million is a share count of votes BUT I was wrong that the number doesn't include people who didn't vote which who knows how many those are above the 513 million legal shares.
 
Jensing said:
Ok based on AA's tweet I was right that 256 million is a share count of votes BUT I was wrong that the number doesn't include people who didn't vote which who knows how many those are above the 513 million legal shares.
Click to expand...
We all know by now that there has been more shares purchased than are legally available.
 
ValiantThor08 said:
We all know by now that there has been more shares purchased than are legally available.
Click to expand...
Right, but how many more and how does AMC get those shares off the market? The stock will run with more excitement again, then with FOMO buying, but for the squeeze to happen I think they need to get the synthetic shares fixed.
 
Jensing said:
Right, but how many more and how does AMC get those shares off the market? The stock will run with more excitement again, then with FOMO buying, but for the squeeze to happen I think they need to get the synthetic shares fixed.
Click to expand...
Those shares will be taken care of when the hedgefunds are forced to cover their positions, and buy them back.
 
Jensing said:
I jumped on the AMC wagon in May so I don't have the same amount of research. It can squeeze even based on my math so I'm not saying it won't, that's the only reason I'm invested. I just want honest info which I think both sides are throwing out lies at this point.

How I read that screenshot is you have votes for, against, and non votes. The non votes would count anyone that didn't vote. I would assume you get 1 vote per share otherwise I have the same say as Blackrock. So if that's the case it's 256 million shares. Again I could be missing something, but even if you assume I'm right the share price should be at least double what it is currently.
Click to expand...

Keep it simple, the shorts are stuck and havent covered yet. We dont need to confirm sythentics (although its a big interest of mine,) if it happens it happens but this at minimum is a squeeze play either way (as long as we do our part and hold, if not its collapses) just that if there are synthetics it can dramatically explode.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top