Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Primordial Performance + FDA Raid!

HereToStudy said:
But bro, this one is real.G'Damnit, I told myself awhile ago no more religion debates online.
Click to expand...

Do it!

I typically avoid religon/politic threads but once in a while they are fun to get involved with.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S™II using Tapatalk 2
 
JudoJosh said:
Do it!

I typically avoid religon/politic threads but once in a while they are fun to get involved with.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S™II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

It is hard for me to have a religious debate because my views are extreme. I was raised Catholic, went to private schools my entire life as my family wanted religion to be a very important part of my life. In the end, however, I see faith with the same eye as I see the belief of fairy tales. I see religion as a method of taking advantage of this human logical weakness in order to enforce ideals, collect money, and enjoy the many other benefits that come with organized religion (I mean...who WANTS to pay taxes?). I don't disrespect people that believe, it should be obvious that my family does based on what I said previously. However, I can't find a way to have a logical discussion on a subject I find to lack any form of logic.
 
Sadly most have no idea of what faith is because it is counter-intellectual and counter-logical/reasonable and therefore they reject it. Sadly far too many very intelligent people are victims of themselves. They have great intellectual capacity to define and metaphore what a paradox principle is yet are completely and hopelessly powerless to live by it.

Inserting religion and mythology into a faith discussion is foolish. Discussing faith with someone who has no idea what faith is or how to practice it is equally foolish.

"Do not deceive yourselves. If any of you think you are wise by the standards of this age, you should become fools so that you may become wise."
 
David Dunn said:
Sadly most have no idea of what faith is because it is counter-intellectual and counter-logical/reasonable and therefore they reject it. Sadly far too many very intelligent people are victims of themselves. They have great intellectual capacity to define and metaphore what a paradox principle is yet are completely and hopelessly powerless to live by it.

Inserting religion and mythology into a faith discussion is foolish. Discussing faith with someone who has no idea what faith is or how to practice it is equally foolish.

"Do not deceive yourselves. If any of you think you are wise by the standards of this age, you should become fools so that you may become wise."
Click to expand...

agreed 100%
 
fueledpassion said:
Man, I'm not an expert here but it sounds like you are bitter towards God. I wouldn't dare argue with someone bitter at God. You'll just have to answer to that in the end. Besides, the unbelieving won't be convinced by explanations alone anyways. How could you? The world is very effective at covering up the reality that we've been torn from a loving God, and ever since man has attempted to fill this void with earthly treasures. In that attempt, much pain has been experienced. This is the pain of imperfection, which was something we chose and still choose every single day - even the Christians often times choose this painful way over God's way. This is why we need Christ in the first place. And I'm not necessarily saying that you are or are not this or that, but it does take a prideful heart to question/rebuke something you do not fully understand. It's not that God's way is flawed, but that our way is flawed.

But you'll be convinced by something entirely different than a good argument. It's it the famous words of Jesus saying: "A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. [SUP]35 [/SUP]By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

I'd love to respond to the initial post you made, but I would prefer to in PM only since we'd be severely distracted by everyone else.
Click to expand...

I'm not bitter towards god at all. You can pm me
 
I subscribe to more of a deism/agnostic belief. Is there a God? I don't know. I see it as a possibility certainly but can't really say definitely that there absolutely is or isnt which is why I wouldn't call myself an athesit. Believing in some sort of higher power doesn't really cost me anything so why not believe it. Its a nice and comforting thought IMO. Problem I have is religion. You see in my opinion, science doesn't disprove God. The big bang theory and evolution doesn't say God doesn't exist, but it does say the bible and organized religion is wrong. And that is only one example. And this isn't exclusive to just Christianity, you can see this in all religions. But again this doesn't prove there isn't a God, just that mans interpretation of what God is wrong. Follow? I feel like I am sort of rambling here lol

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S™II using Tapatalk 2
 
EDIT

i posted a long post on here but for some reason i couldnt post the rest of the story so ill repost it once i can.
 
JudoJosh said:
Where's @Invalid Link Removed

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S™II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
I have been trying to stay out of this one a bit....for obvious reasons. :)

Although I will say that the list you quote is not 100% accurate, as Horus' story has been embellished.

I will just say this, the narrative of Yeshua has been taken many times from earlier Pagan sources. That does not mean that a character of the time did not exist, just that much of the stories, miracles and traditions are identical to many earlier sources.

Additionally, I do hope that people realize that there were countless miracle workers at the time and earlier than Yeshua. A great example is Simon of Perea. Additionally, I know many theists will make the case that due to the population of christianity and its 2000 year history, that is proof of its veracity. Not necessarily. I would suggest reading the contemporary works of Pliny as well as research the Council of Nicea and Hippo to see how more "modern" Christianity came to be.
 
JudoJosh said:
Shame on you for not paying attention in High School science classes. Our sun is a medium size star. There are stars that are waaay bigger than our sun such as the Betelgeuse star which is 700 times bigger and 14,000 times brighter.

By the way, you do realize planets aren't stars right?



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S™II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

beetlejuice beetlejuice beetlejuice
 
iparatroop said:
How is David Dunn so smart?
Click to expand...
I don't know if you are being sincere? In either case I am not so smart really.

JudoJosh said:
I subscribe to more of a deism/agnostic belief. Is there a God? I don't know. I see it as a possibility certainly but can't really say definitely that there absolutely is or isnt which is why I wouldn't call myself an athesit. Believing in some sort of higher power doesn't really cost me anything so why not believe it. Its a nice and comforting thought IMO. Problem I have is religion. You see in my opinion, science doesn't disprove God. The big bang theory and evolution doesn't say God doesn't exist, but it does say the bible and organized religion is wrong. And that is only one example. And this isn't exclusive to just Christianity, you can see this in all religions. But again this doesn't prove there isn't a God, just that mans interpretation of what God is wrong. Follow? I feel like I am sort of rambling here lol

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S™II using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
I have absolutely the same proof you do. None. But "the substance of things hoped for by the evidence of the unseen" have been abundant in my life. "You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart." It does not say mind, logic, reason or any other faculty. All of those faculties contradict time after time after time. I cannot find Him on my terms.

AE14 said:
I have been trying to stay out of this one a bit....for obvious reasons. :)

Although I will say that the list you quote is not 100% accurate, as Horus' story has been embellished.

I will just say this, the narrative of Yeshua has been taken many times from earlier Pagan sources. That does not mean that a character of the time did not exist, just that much of the stories, miracles and traditions are identical to many earlier sources.

Additionally, I do hope that people realize that there were countless miracle workers at the time and earlier than Yeshua. A great example is Simon of Perea. Additionally, I know many theists will make the case that due to the population of christianity and its 2000 year history, that is proof of its veracity. Not necessarily. I would suggest reading the contemporary works of Pliny as well as research the Council of Nicea and Hippo to see how more "modern" Christianity came to be.
Click to expand...
Hi! :)
 
David Dunn said:
I don't know if you are being sincere? In either case I am not so smart really.

I have absolutely the same proof you do. None. But "the substance of things hoped for by the evidence of the unseen" have been abundant in my life. "You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart." It does not say mind, logic, reason or any other faculty. All of those faculties contradict time after time after time. I cannot find Him on my terms.

Hi! :)
Click to expand...

you hit the nail on the head.
 
David Dunn said:
I have absolutely the same proof you do. None. But "the substance of things hoped for by the evidence of the unseen" have been abundant in my life. "You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart." It does not say mind, logic, reason or any other faculty. All of those faculties contradict time after time after time. I cannot find Him on my terms.
Click to expand...

“Any faith that must be supported by the evidence of the senses is not real faith.”
― Invalid Link Removed,
 
That which can be professed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 
So, what did happen with PP? Too lazy to read through all the jibber-jabber.
 
tyga tyga said:
Science is based on theory ;)
Click to expand...

You need to learn what the definition of theory is because in the context which you are using it it seems you think it is merely just a whimsically idea someone makes up
 
tyga tyga said:
Science is based on theory ;)
Click to expand...

the big bang theory relies on one hell of a lot of coinidence????

btw-anyone ever saw the pyramids in person? it is impossible for me to believe that eygptians were able to build them with the technology that they suppossedly had available at the time???? either they were far more advanced than science tells us, or there was something else involved....
 
thebigt said:
btw-anyone ever saw the pyramids in person? it is impossible for me to believe that eygptians were able to build them with the technology that they suppossedly had available at the time???? either they were far more advanced than science tells us, or there was something else involved....
Click to expand...

Here is a possibility .. ;)

Invalid Link Removed
 
thebigt said:
the big bang theory relies on one hell of a lot of coinidence????

btw-anyone ever saw the pyramids in person? it is impossible for me to believe that eygptians were able to build them with the technology that they suppossedly had available at the time???? either they were far more advanced than science tells us, or there was something else involved....
Click to expand...

They couldn't have built them. The time lines don't match up as it doesn't with the sphinx's weathering patterns.

Edit: timelines meant the purported 20 years it took. That doesn't work. At that rate, a stone would need to be in place perfectly every 90-120 seconds. Sones of solid limestone that are so precise a razor couldn't fit between them. In all honesty, there is evidence that there were civilizations prior to the ending of the last ice age. If they were advanced, this would make far more sense.
 
thebigt said:
the big bang theory relies on one hell of a lot of coinidence????

btw-anyone ever saw the pyramids in person? it is impossible for me to believe that eygptians were able to build them with the technology that they suppossedly had available at the time???? either they were far more advanced than science tells us, or there was something else involved....
Click to expand...

some argue that the Big Bang can coincide with the Biblical description of creation.

Big Bang = moment God started creating the universe as we know it

I don't have the mental capacity or the texting skills (on my phone) to expand but it's interesting.


personally, I think it takes more faith to believe the Big Bang and everything is just chance than a matter of divine creation.

it is nice to see people having discussions without character attacks. 'merica!
 
thebigt said:
the big bang theory relies on one hell of a lot of coinidence????

btw-anyone ever saw the pyramids in person? it is impossible for me to believe that eygptians were able to build them with the technology that they suppossedly had available at the time???? either they were far more advanced than science tells us, or there was something else involved....
Click to expand...

even though im a christian, i believe in the big bang theory 100%. how can you not?! God said, in the span of 6 days, BANG and the world happened. duh
 
carpee said:
some argue that the Big Bang can coincide with the Biblical description of creation.

Big Bang = moment God started creating the universe as we know it

I don't have the mental capacity or the texting skills (on my phone) to expand but it's interesting.


personally, I think it takes more faith to believe the Big Bang and everything is just chance than a matter of divine creation.

it is nice to see people having discussions without character attacks. 'merica!
Click to expand...

said the same thing in an earlier post. if only more christians had the amount of faith some non believers have....
 
R1balla said:
even though im a christian, i believe in the big bang theory 100%. how can you not?! God said, in the span of 6 days, BANG and the world happened. duh
Click to expand...

i don't think that the big bang theory science uses to explain creation includes divine intervention....
 
David Dunn said:
Sadly most have no idea of what faith is because it is counter-intellectual and counter-logical/reasonable and therefore they reject it. Sadly far too many very intelligent people are victims of themselves. They have great intellectual capacity to define and metaphore what a paradox principle is yet are completely and hopelessly powerless to live by it.

Inserting religion and mythology into a faith discussion is foolish. Discussing faith with someone who has no idea what faith is or how to practice it is equally foolish.

"Do not deceive yourselves. If any of you think you are wise by the standards of this age, you should become fools so that you may become wise."
Click to expand...

“To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible.”
― Invalid Link Removed
 
R1balla said:
even though im a christian, i believe in the big bang theory 100%. how can you not?! God said, in the span of 6 days, BANG and the world happened. duh
Click to expand...

Time is a creation of man, you are now making the assumption that a day to God is the same as a day to us.

When realistically a day to him could be hundreds, or thousands, of years to us.
 
Stephen Hawking on The Big Bang Theory

[video=youtube;gs-yWMuBNr4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs-yWMuBNr4[/video]
 
jimbuick said:
Time is a creation of man, you are now making the assumption that a day to God is the same as a day to us.

When realistically a day to him could be hundreds, or thousands, of years to us.
Click to expand...

This
 
jimbuick said:
Time is a creation of man, you are now making the assumption that a day to God is the same as a day to us.

When realistically a day to him could be hundreds, or thousands, of years to us.
Click to expand...

An earth day is 1 rotation no matter who you are. A mars day is 1 mars rotation no matter who you are. So yes, with the same spinning body, a day has to be the same or days themselves don't make sense.

Someone didn't just say "24 is a cool number, let's make that the number of these awesome "hour" things in a day"
 
pump3d said:
An earth day is 1 rotation no matter who you are. A mars day is 1 mars rotation no matter who you are. So yes, with the same spinning body, a day has to be the same or days themselves don't make sense.

Someone didn't just say "24 is a cool number, let's make that the number of these awesome "hour" things in a day"
Click to expand...

he was referring to the scripture.
 
pump3d said:
An earth day is 1 rotation no matter who you are. A mars day is 1 mars rotation no matter who you are. So yes, with the same spinning body, a day has to be the same or days themselves don't make sense.

Someone didn't just say "24 is a cool number, let's make that the number of these awesome "hour" things in a day"
Click to expand...

Thank you for the elementary school lesson. Time is still the creation of man.

And now you are assuming that God is on Earth (when he resides in Heaven), does Heaven even rotate on any axis? I don't know, do you somehow know?

Now you assume the days that were spoken of were rotations of Earth, which it says not one time in the Bible.

God didn't create time, we did.
 
HereToStudy said:
I told myself awhile ago no more religion debates online.
Click to expand...

I tried to end it before it started, but people are very passionate about this kind of stuff; afterall, many peoples lives revolve around it. Some poeples lives revolve around faith and trying to persuade them something isn't real will get you nowhere, and vice versa. The only real end to a religion debate is to agree to diagree on the subject. Afterall, if either sides arguments were compelling enough then this debate need not happen as factual evidence and circumstance will dictate the outcome.

A large portion, if not the sole reason for religion is based on faith which cannot be scientifically proven nor disproven. Its not measurable or quantifiable in the same way other things are, therefore a generl consensus may never be made.

As David Dunn said, you cannot argue faith with a person who does not understand it or even acknowledge its existance. You cannot impart faith on someone, it must be sought for oneself.
 
You only need a PCT for CEE. That sheets hardcore yo

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S™II using Tapatalk 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top