Na r ala makes you put on fat?
Like ALL GDA's ... a double edged sword.
With Gda's THERE is NO scientific evidence that nutrients are directed MORE in muscle than adipocytes.
SO if there is MORE caloric intake than expenditure the excess will go to fat.
1)The only moment where muscles are more "receptive" than fat tissue is POST-WO.
2)The only situation where a caloric surplus can be stored in muscles and less in fat is maybe when MUSCLES are DEPLETED.
In my experience ALA (and R-ALA) is fantastic to drive nutrients to
cells . (and in my case I feel ALA more potent -if used in high quantity- than isomer R-)
cells = muscles cells OR fat cells. How much will go in fat or muscles it depends on 1) and 2) situations.
For damage control OR supplemets that ALLOW more carb intake (without store too fat) there are product where ingredients are ALSO "carb blocker" or where not all complex carbs are converter in glucose.
Gymnema is an example . It can be a multiplier or a "detractor" .
These supplements are always called "GDA"... but (always in MY opinion ) the need to be called in a another WAY.
Then there is the dependent variable of the diet of the moment (in bulk or cut or isocaloric)... and a same GDA can act different.
In my body and my experience I can distinguish between supplents that has in it ALA or not.
with ALA and I gain weight
without and I loose.
For this reason I do not like the new SLinSane V2.
Another example: Recompadrol (I love it)
if I'm in isocaloric diet and I have a wedding party(megacaloric and with many carbs) , I do a work-out then:
-if I use 3 caps of recompadrol the day later i'm the same wehight
-if I use 3 caps and I add 1-1,5g of ALA the next day I'm 2 or 3 lbs MORE.