Methyl 4AD log

but if all you want to do is pick apart my cycle so you can say you were right,

Its not like I'm the only one who said this. This is the opinion of Chemo, Pat and most people that know the pharmacology of these susbtances. So your mistaken when you think its just me tooting my own horn. Thats ridiculous.
 
Bobo said:
I suggest you rethink your attitude towards my post. Picking apart your post? Its called criticism and I suggest you learn to live with it. If you can't, then don't post. I didn't say it wouldn't work, just that overall its not worth it when there are much better alternatives out there with less side effects IMO. Even the people selling it were skeptical. If you have a problem with that then you better get a clue. Don't sit there and tell me its worth it when you don't even know by what mechanisms these substances work. So if you REALLY want me to pick you apart I most certainly will. If not, learn to take the ciriticism of just WHY your getting so little results compared to other substances.

Jesus its not like I'm ciriticizing you, I'm criticizing M4AD! I didn't know you were so personally attached to it.

You do know that 17 methyl E2 should cause at least SOME water retention right? Were you not aware of its metabolites? Do you really want to get into this?
bobo,
Let the man finish his cycle in peace. Its too early for you to claim victory and wave the, "I told you so" flag as you laugh at his bloated, gyno ridden body.
A little encouragement goes a long way
 
bellicose said:
bobo,
Let the man finish his cycle in peace. Its too early for you to claim victory and wave the, "I told you so" flag as you laugh at his bloated, gyno ridden body.
A little encouragement goes a long way

What the hell do you people not get? I never said it wouldn't work. I just said there are better alternatives out there considering his first week results (and also considering methyls should act faster than transdermals). I said IF the trend continues as his first week results indicate, its not woirht it IMO.

"This just seems EXACTLY what you should see from a precursor to methyl test. Its not a surprise that the results seem to reinforce that view."


Are you people faimilar with the success methyl test has? Its NONE.
 
bellicose said:
bobo,
Let the man finish his cycle in peace. Its too early for you to claim victory and wave the, "I told you so" flag as you laugh at his bloated, gyno ridden body.
A little encouragement goes a long way

Do not presume to tell what I should or should not do. Like I said before its not just me, its everyone that knows the pharmacology of these substances. Its predicted to be inferior. If you have any more valuable information that can state otherwise please tell us all. If not.....
 
sifu said:
**** I hope you guys don't visit my M1,4ADD log. :D

Lol...your next(dun..dun.dunnnnnn)
Joking aside, i hope you guys the best on your cycles. It was a brave act to volunteer to test out these "scary" new compounds as some have called them. Hopefully, they won't turn out to be as much of a failure as some have expected.
 
I don't find my substance scary. However I don't think I would have done Methyl4AD. But hey to each his own.
 
Bobo said:
What the hell do you people not get? I never said it wouldn't work. I just said there are better alternatives out there considering his first week results (and also considering methyls should act faster than transdermals). I said IF the trend continues as his first week results indicate, its not woirht it IMO.

"This just seems EXACTLY what you should see from a precursor to methyl test. Its not a surprise that the results seem to reinforce that view."


Are you people faimilar with the success methyl test has? Its NONE.

There's always a better alternative when your talking about prohormones.
I don't think he's encountered any side effects yet so maybe the dose is the reason the gains are not as they should be. There are many factors involved.
 
sifu said:
**** I hope you guys don't visit my M1,4ADD log. :D

That substance (AS MOST PREDICT) should be pretty good. Why? Its base structure aromtizes half of what methyl test would (M4AD) so there is a logical basis for its to be pretty good.


Thats the difference. M4AD doesn't even look good on paper and his first week results indicate that. Thats all I'm saying so why don't you people stop act like I'm criticizing your mothers and take the information for what its worth.
 
I was only kidding Bobo, no need to get heated. I have always respected your opinion, you should know that by now.
 
bellicose said:
There's always a better alternative when your talking about prohormones.
I don't think he's encountered any side effects yet so maybe the dose is the reason the gains are not as they should be. There are many factors involved.

And do you want to know why? Because JUST LIKE METHYL TEST, you needed a higher dose to get an anabolic effect. Once the dose was that high the side effects became very bad because it aromatized so heavily into 17 methyl E2 (half of dbol). There are your factors. Care to share any more with me?

The fact that it is an oral also should be in consideration. Why? Because 17 methylated substances tend to act fast. So when an oral doesn't give me the same results as a NON-methylated transdermal which techincally should take weeks to see results, it tells me something. See where I'm coming from? Everyone understand? Should I post Powerpoint slides?

You guys are sitting there getting defensive withouth even knowing why this **** happens.
 
Bobo said:
That substance (AS MOST PREDICT) should be pretty good. Why? Its base structure aromtizes half of what methyl test would (M4AD) so there is a logical basis for its to be pretty good.


Thats the difference. M4AD doesn't even look good on paper and his first week results indicate that. Thats all I'm saying so why don't you people stop act like I'm criticizing your mothers and take the information for what its worth.
i'm looking forward to my m1,4 and m5aa cycle coming up. I'll be sure to post a nice cycle log.
We'll see how your paper info will work out in the real world there bobo
 
Bobo said:
And do you want to know why? Because JUST LIKE METHYL TEST, you needed a higher dose to get an anabolic effect. Once the dose was that high the side effects became very bad because it aromatized so heavily into 17 methyl E2 (half of dbol). There are your factors. Care to share any more with me?

The fact that it is an oral also should be in consideration. Why? Because 17 methylated substances tend to act fast. So when an oral doesn't give me the same results as a NON-methylated transdermal which techincally should take weeks to see results, it tells me something. See where I'm coming from? Everyone understand? Should I post Powerpoint slides?

You guys are sitting there getting defensive withouth even knowing why this **** happens.
Your reasoning is perfect, however these substances have not been used before and i like personal accounts. I'm not getting defensive i'm just saying, "how many people have you talked to that have had problems with m4ad?" Answer me that, paper is great but i like real world effects.
No mas
 
sifu said:
I was only kidding Bobo, no need to get heated. I have always respected your opinion, you should know that by now.

I'm not heated at all with you Sifu. I just get irritated when someone can't take criticism of a substance they are using. Its not like I'm saying he's and idiot or something. These logs are for people to see the results of certain hormones and to establish why or why not certain things work. They are for critical thinking just like any other forum. Its my opinion that this substance is not worth it for several reasons. Thats all. The M5AA that he has already has been shown to more effective in the first 5 days by prolangtum and that doens't even aromatize!
 
bellicose said:
Your reasoning is perfect, however these substances have not been used before and i like personal accounts. I'm not getting defensive i'm just saying, "how many people have you talked to that have had problems with m4ad?" Answer me that, paper is great but i like real world effects.
No mas

Yes they have and yes I know people that have used it. Just because you can't get it through a company does not mean its not available. Its the same thing with M1T. I knew people that used it that got it from China before it was even released to the public. Sledge is doing you a favor by doing it out in the open. This stuff is usually done behind the scense to establish results and to decide whether its going to be manufactured. Thats how M1T was done. I also know people that have used methyl test and would never use it again.Why? It sucks. Any more questions?
 
Cool. I didn't think so, but I was making sure.

I am cool with people criticizing what I am taking. But hey someone needs to be the guinea pig, and the substance looked good to me. But M4AD is another issue for me.
 
bellicose said:
bobo,
Let the man finish his cycle in peace. Its too early for you to claim victory and wave the, "I told you so" flag as you laugh at his bloated, gyno ridden body.
A little encouragement goes a long way
hahahahahaha LOL that's funny man. Thanks for the support. :D
 
Why do you guys even bother arguing with this guy?

Talk about not being open to new ideas. Maybe he'll revise the Bible while he's at it.
 
farmer said:
Why do you guys even bother arguing with this guy?

Talk about not being open to new ideas. Maybe he'll revise the Bible while he's at it.

And who are you? New ideas? Where is the new idea?


Just because its new to you doesn't mean its new overall. I hate to break it to you Mr. Sarcastic but the idea of M4ad has been around for some time. Now please take your comments elswhere if you have nothing to add but sarcastic comments.
 
Bobo said:
Yes they have and yes I know people that have used it. Just because you can't get it through a company does not mean its not available. Its the same thing with M1T. I knew people that used it that got it from China before it was even released to the public. Sledge is doing you a favor by doing it out in the open. This stuff is usually done behind the scense to establish results and to decide whether its going to be manufactured. Thats how M1T was done. I also know people that have used methyl test and would never use it again.Why? It sucks. Any more questions?
Yes, if these compounds are done behind the scenes then what were the results from m1,4?
What about 17oh or whatever that stuff that's comparable to anavar?
What else is on the horizon that we don't know about? Since you know alot more than me please educate me on what's next.
thank you
 
M1,4 diol was shown to aromatize more than expected. Ask instyct999 about the other substance. I know he's had many people use it already.

As for whats next, thats not for me to annouce.
 
The purpose of this thread was to find out what happens with this stuff. I happen not to know what it does. If you already know then fine.

"Something to add to the thread"? Alot of people have tried.
 
This forum is also for critical thinking. As ADMIN here I should know what the forums are about a little more than you. If you don't want to particpate in a forum that encourages debate then this isn't the right place for you. Maybe you weren't aware of these facts since you only have 10 posts.

When someone doesn't understand the mechanisms and pathways of how these hormones operate, then it our responsiblity to keep them informed of these facts, especially since the this generation of PH's are very potent.

Now keep this topic to this log and the substance.
 
bellicose said:
i'm looking forward to my m1,4 and m5aa cycle coming up. I'll be sure to post a nice cycle log.
We'll see how your paper info will work out in the real world there bobo

Then look at Sifu's and Jergo's log. They seem to love it already. You do know that my "paper" info is based on REAL assays right? There is a reason why M1T, 4AD, 1AD, 1-Test and numerous other substances were released. They looked good on "paper" which is basically clincal studies. Many of them aren't even availaible on PubMed. They are old texts from the 50's and 60's done in the REAL world.
 
Ya I like it. I just got back from working out, and I had a great workout. It is only day five and I am getting swole. Even on a complete cutting diet. Everyone is asking me what I am taking.

For the people I don't know I just tell them Animal Pack. hehehe


I have told two of my buds from work though.

But I definately like it so far.
 
My opinion:

You need to increase the dosage level. However, as dosages increase so will the possibilities of side effects so be watchful.
 
I am planning on running 10mg M1T and 40mg M4-AD, even after speaking with Chemo about it ;) I just figured "....ahh what the hell!" :D I want to give it a shot to evaluate the product, see what really happens on it, even with the history of methyl-test in the background. It shouldn't be too dangerous, and it's cheap, although I will go into it knowing other choices are more "efficient". Bobo would just as easily criticize me for it, but he knows I don't really care what his clown ass says, anyway :eek: :D That and I know what it's all about going into it. ;)
 
imo run it at the dose ur at and see how it goes for at least 4 weeks..let others go for a higher dose .be nice to see a human being show some restrained for science
 
size said:
My opinion:

You need to increase the dosage level. However, as dosages increase so will the possibilities of side effects so be watchful.
That's what I'm gonna do. it seems to me, that the guys taking M1,4 have already encountered estrogen sides. Jergo is even starting nolva. So far I have experienced ZERO negative sides. I'm not worried about it. I do have nolva just in case.
 
Tuesday morning... Weight is unchanged from yesterday,although my muscles are noticably fuller. My legs seem more cut,And the abs are looking a little better so I may have lost a little fat.After yesterdays intresting debate, I've decided to go up to 60mg for a few days to see what happens. By two weeks if the sides are'nt bad I'm going up to 80mg.So for now, it will be 40 in the morning and 20 at dinner.Like I said, aside from a little acne, There have been zero negative sides. Since I am so lean, it should be pretty easy to tell if I get bloated so I will be very watchfull. Wish me luck! :D
 
Chest workout was awesome today. Put more weight on the bench.10lbs for 12,10,and 8. Thought the abs were looking leaner,so I took a waist measurement. Down 1/4". :cool:
 
jweave23 said:
I am planning on running 10mg M1T and 40mg M4-AD, even after speaking with Chemo about it ;) I just figured "....ahh what the hell!" :D I want to give it a shot to evaluate the product, see what really happens on it, even with the history of methyl-test in the background. It shouldn't be too dangerous, and it's cheap, although I will go into it knowing other choices are more "efficient". Bobo would just as easily criticize me for it, but he knows I don't really care what his clown ass says, anyway :eek: :D That and I know what it's all about going into it. ;)


:rolleyes:

How soon they forget.
 
I know most of the time these trials are done behind the scenes first before people will release anything. But if the product dosent work then i wont bring it out and if it dosent work then everyone should know it dosent work. This way hopefully companies like VPX wont be able to just continue to charge wayyy to much for stuff that dosent work.

I think its working for lean one, although not as strong as other compounds the sides arent there yet which is a good thing. There needs to be som elesser strength compounds as well as strong ones, not everything needs to be at least 10 times more anabolic then methyltest in order for it to be good. Hopefully methyl-4ad has more anabolic value being intrinsic then after being converted and this will keep the sides to a min.
 
If I may call a truce with Bobo, I'd like to ask an honest question.

It is understood totally that M4AD is inferior to most if not all other methylated PH's. With that said, what do you see as the correct place in a cycle for M4AD?
When bulking, I don't worry about bloat at all. I try to look down the road to the final results and I'm sure you can understand this. So do you think this compound has a place in a cycle?
 
farmer said:
If I may call a truce with Bobo, I'd like to ask an honest question.

It is understood totally that M4AD is inferior to most if not all other methylated PH's. With that said, what do you see as the correct place in a cycle for M4AD?
When bulking, I don't worry about bloat at all. I try to look down the road to the final results and I'm sure you can understand this. So do you think this compound has a place in a cycle?
If I may reply to you since I speak from experience with this. I think this compound can have some value in a bulking cycle. So far, at 60 mg/day I have no bloat or other estrogenic sides. The only drawback is that for an experienced PH user, You need a higher dose. I really don't think it is as estrogenic as people think.I plan to take it up to 80mg in a couple days, and mabey even 100. If estrogen sides are manageable,I want to see how much I can get from this before I add the M5AA. Be patient and follow this thread. I'm trying to answer yours and other questions with this cycle.

On a side note... I think bumping it up to 60mg is doing me nicely. Things are lookin good in the mirror. Also my waist is down 1/4". Yeah. :cool:
 
Designer Supps said:
Hopefully methyl-4ad has more anabolic value being intrinsic then after being converted and this will keep the sides to a min.
I think this is exactly the case here. This is how I've felt about it all along.
 
farmer said:
If I may call a truce with Bobo, I'd like to ask an honest question.

It is understood totally that M4AD is inferior to most if not all other methylated PH's. With that said, what do you see as the correct place in a cycle for M4AD?
When bulking, I don't worry about bloat at all. I try to look down the road to the final results and I'm sure you can understand this. So do you think this compound has a place in a cycle?

I really don't feel it has much of a place at all consdiering you can get a better substance with either one of the injectable 4AD's or transdermal 4AD withouth the risk of liver stress. On top of that the dose needed to get an equivalent effect to that of the other alternatives would require you to have Nolva on hand while as the others you would not since estradiol is fairly weak compared to 17 methyl estradiol. Gyno would be very rare with thjose compared to M4AD if equivalent doses were taken. The take in the fact if you use the other alternatives that allows you to use another methylated susbtance (dienolone, M5AA, M1T, etc...). If you use M4AD you shouldn't be taking another methylated substance. Thats just being careless and unwise unless you lower the doses which then would defeat the whole point in taking them IMO. So after all that the purpose of M4AD for the regular user doesn't seem worth it IMO when there are much better alternatives that will give you better results without the extra liver stress and also more flexibility to use other substances.
 
It just makes sense that the methyl will act the same as the Non methyl because it is effected by the same enzymes. Methylating will make the hormone and its metabolites more potent and orally available.
 
Look at D-bol though. I think I'm correct in saying that it is methylated bold. There is no comparison between those two. I don't see how you could expect the 4AD and M4AD to act the same when there's such a difference with other methylated products. I really was hoping that M4AD would end some of the twice a day trans applications and inj's but it may not turn out as such.
Lean One said:
It just makes sense that the methyl will act the same as the Non methyl because it is effected by the same enzymes. Methylating will make the hormone and its metabolites more potent and orally available.
 
Bobo said:
On top of that the dose needed to get an equivalent effect to that of the other alternatives would require you to have Nolva on hand while as the others you would not since estradiol is fairly weak compared to 17 methyl estradiol.
This has not been proven in the real world. Give me some time I'm trying to answer this question. Also, some of us don't want to inject. there are various reasons for this. Mine happen to be a 3yr old daughter and an 8 month old son. I don't want needles anywhere in my house.
 
The methyl won't act the same. It will less androgenic than its base counterpart. It will be more anabolic just by increasing the potency of tios metabolites. But in this case I would rather use a high dose of the regular 4AD because it will be less toxic and also give better results IMO.
 
farmer said:
Look at D-bol though. I think I'm correct in saying that it is methylated bold. There is no comparison between those two. I don't see how you could expect the 4AD and M4AD to act the same when there's such a difference with other methylated products. I really was hoping that M4AD would end some of the twice a day trans applications and inj's but it may not turn out as such.

The difference is metabolites. Thats how potent 17 methyl E2 is.
 
Lean One said:
This has not been proven in the real world. Give me some time I'm trying to answer this question. Also, some of us don't want to inject. there are various reasons for this. Mine happen to be a 3yr old daughter and an 8 month old son. I don't want needles anywhere in my house.

It converts into methyl test which has been proven. Assays are done in the real world, not a fantasy land.
 
Bobo said:
It converts into methyl test which has been proven. Assays are done in the real world, not a fantasy land.
At 3 mg per 20mg dose? I thought we've been through this. At high doses, E2 would only be a gram or two. At 20 to 40 mg we are talking Micrograms.Hardly enough to cause concern.
 
Yeah we have been throught this and you don't seem to get that if you take such a low dose you won't have MUCH GROWTH!

I also suggest you look up the doses of HRT for woman and how little estradiol they take.

E2 at a GRAM??? Get a bra.

Gee for someone who didn't know the pathways of this drug you seem to know a lot about dosages and what effects they have.

The dose your taking is so damn small no wonder you lost weight. Your log over at Avant shows your diet to be less than satisfactory if your eating pizza then cutting carbs the next day. What is your goal anyway?
 
Back
Top