but if all you want to do is pick apart my cycle so you can say you were right,
bobo,Bobo said:I suggest you rethink your attitude towards my post. Picking apart your post? Its called criticism and I suggest you learn to live with it. If you can't, then don't post. I didn't say it wouldn't work, just that overall its not worth it when there are much better alternatives out there with less side effects IMO. Even the people selling it were skeptical. If you have a problem with that then you better get a clue. Don't sit there and tell me its worth it when you don't even know by what mechanisms these substances work. So if you REALLY want me to pick you apart I most certainly will. If not, learn to take the ciriticism of just WHY your getting so little results compared to other substances.
Jesus its not like I'm ciriticizing you, I'm criticizing M4AD! I didn't know you were so personally attached to it.
You do know that 17 methyl E2 should cause at least SOME water retention right? Were you not aware of its metabolites? Do you really want to get into this?
bellicose said:bobo,
Let the man finish his cycle in peace. Its too early for you to claim victory and wave the, "I told you so" flag as you laugh at his bloated, gyno ridden body.
A little encouragement goes a long way
bellicose said:bobo,
Let the man finish his cycle in peace. Its too early for you to claim victory and wave the, "I told you so" flag as you laugh at his bloated, gyno ridden body.
A little encouragement goes a long way
sifu said:**** I hope you guys don't visit my M1,4ADD log.![]()
Bobo said:What the hell do you people not get? I never said it wouldn't work. I just said there are better alternatives out there considering his first week results (and also considering methyls should act faster than transdermals). I said IF the trend continues as his first week results indicate, its not woirht it IMO.
"This just seems EXACTLY what you should see from a precursor to methyl test. Its not a surprise that the results seem to reinforce that view."
Are you people faimilar with the success methyl test has? Its NONE.
sifu said:**** I hope you guys don't visit my M1,4ADD log.![]()
bellicose said:There's always a better alternative when your talking about prohormones.
I don't think he's encountered any side effects yet so maybe the dose is the reason the gains are not as they should be. There are many factors involved.
i'm looking forward to my m1,4 and m5aa cycle coming up. I'll be sure to post a nice cycle log.Bobo said:That substance (AS MOST PREDICT) should be pretty good. Why? Its base structure aromtizes half of what methyl test would (M4AD) so there is a logical basis for its to be pretty good.
Thats the difference. M4AD doesn't even look good on paper and his first week results indicate that. Thats all I'm saying so why don't you people stop act like I'm criticizing your mothers and take the information for what its worth.
Your reasoning is perfect, however these substances have not been used before and i like personal accounts. I'm not getting defensive i'm just saying, "how many people have you talked to that have had problems with m4ad?" Answer me that, paper is great but i like real world effects.Bobo said:And do you want to know why? Because JUST LIKE METHYL TEST, you needed a higher dose to get an anabolic effect. Once the dose was that high the side effects became very bad because it aromatized so heavily into 17 methyl E2 (half of dbol). There are your factors. Care to share any more with me?
The fact that it is an oral also should be in consideration. Why? Because 17 methylated substances tend to act fast. So when an oral doesn't give me the same results as a NON-methylated transdermal which techincally should take weeks to see results, it tells me something. See where I'm coming from? Everyone understand? Should I post Powerpoint slides?
You guys are sitting there getting defensive withouth even knowing why this **** happens.
sifu said:I was only kidding Bobo, no need to get heated. I have always respected your opinion, you should know that by now.
bellicose said:Your reasoning is perfect, however these substances have not been used before and i like personal accounts. I'm not getting defensive i'm just saying, "how many people have you talked to that have had problems with m4ad?" Answer me that, paper is great but i like real world effects.
No mas
hahahahahaha LOL that's funny man. Thanks for the support.bellicose said:bobo,
Let the man finish his cycle in peace. Its too early for you to claim victory and wave the, "I told you so" flag as you laugh at his bloated, gyno ridden body.
A little encouragement goes a long way
farmer said:Why do you guys even bother arguing with this guy?
Talk about not being open to new ideas. Maybe he'll revise the Bible while he's at it.
Yes, if these compounds are done behind the scenes then what were the results from m1,4?Bobo said:Yes they have and yes I know people that have used it. Just because you can't get it through a company does not mean its not available. Its the same thing with M1T. I knew people that used it that got it from China before it was even released to the public. Sledge is doing you a favor by doing it out in the open. This stuff is usually done behind the scense to establish results and to decide whether its going to be manufactured. Thats how M1T was done. I also know people that have used methyl test and would never use it again.Why? It sucks. Any more questions?
bellicose said:i'm looking forward to my m1,4 and m5aa cycle coming up. I'll be sure to post a nice cycle log.
We'll see how your paper info will work out in the real world there bobo
That's what I'm gonna do. it seems to me, that the guys taking M1,4 have already encountered estrogen sides. Jergo is even starting nolva. So far I have experienced ZERO negative sides. I'm not worried about it. I do have nolva just in case.size said:My opinion:
You need to increase the dosage level. However, as dosages increase so will the possibilities of side effects so be watchful.
jweave23 said:I am planning on running 10mg M1T and 40mg M4-AD, even after speaking with Chemo about itI just figured "....ahh what the hell!"
I want to give it a shot to evaluate the product, see what really happens on it, even with the history of methyl-test in the background. It shouldn't be too dangerous, and it's cheap, although I will go into it knowing other choices are more "efficient". Bobo would just as easily criticize me for it, but he knows I don't really care what his clown ass says, anyway
![]()
That and I know what it's all about going into it.
![]()
If I may reply to you since I speak from experience with this. I think this compound can have some value in a bulking cycle. So far, at 60 mg/day I have no bloat or other estrogenic sides. The only drawback is that for an experienced PH user, You need a higher dose. I really don't think it is as estrogenic as people think.I plan to take it up to 80mg in a couple days, and mabey even 100. If estrogen sides are manageable,I want to see how much I can get from this before I add the M5AA. Be patient and follow this thread. I'm trying to answer yours and other questions with this cycle.farmer said:If I may call a truce with Bobo, I'd like to ask an honest question.
It is understood totally that M4AD is inferior to most if not all other methylated PH's. With that said, what do you see as the correct place in a cycle for M4AD?
When bulking, I don't worry about bloat at all. I try to look down the road to the final results and I'm sure you can understand this. So do you think this compound has a place in a cycle?
I think this is exactly the case here. This is how I've felt about it all along.Designer Supps said:Hopefully methyl-4ad has more anabolic value being intrinsic then after being converted and this will keep the sides to a min.
farmer said:If I may call a truce with Bobo, I'd like to ask an honest question.
It is understood totally that M4AD is inferior to most if not all other methylated PH's. With that said, what do you see as the correct place in a cycle for M4AD?
When bulking, I don't worry about bloat at all. I try to look down the road to the final results and I'm sure you can understand this. So do you think this compound has a place in a cycle?
Lean One said:It just makes sense that the methyl will act the same as the Non methyl because it is effected by the same enzymes. Methylating will make the hormone and its metabolites more potent and orally available.
This has not been proven in the real world. Give me some time I'm trying to answer this question. Also, some of us don't want to inject. there are various reasons for this. Mine happen to be a 3yr old daughter and an 8 month old son. I don't want needles anywhere in my house.Bobo said:On top of that the dose needed to get an equivalent effect to that of the other alternatives would require you to have Nolva on hand while as the others you would not since estradiol is fairly weak compared to 17 methyl estradiol.
farmer said:Look at D-bol though. I think I'm correct in saying that it is methylated bold. There is no comparison between those two. I don't see how you could expect the 4AD and M4AD to act the same when there's such a difference with other methylated products. I really was hoping that M4AD would end some of the twice a day trans applications and inj's but it may not turn out as such.
Lean One said:This has not been proven in the real world. Give me some time I'm trying to answer this question. Also, some of us don't want to inject. there are various reasons for this. Mine happen to be a 3yr old daughter and an 8 month old son. I don't want needles anywhere in my house.
At 3 mg per 20mg dose? I thought we've been through this. At high doses, E2 would only be a gram or two. At 20 to 40 mg we are talking Micrograms.Hardly enough to cause concern.Bobo said:It converts into methyl test which has been proven. Assays are done in the real world, not a fantasy land.