TeamSavage said:
... You are essentially saying "Trust us" with your promotion of the product. You are making claims, but the customer has to take a leap-of-faith to believe these claims and buy the product. Quality supplements are not the results of sloppiness. Did the company check out the raw material supplier? Did the company have the raw material independently analyzed? Is the company using a GMP-certified, Drug Licensed manufacturing facility? Did the company thoroughly review the supporting research, or did they just glance at a few abstracts? When a write-up is riddled with simple spelling and grammar errors, it signals sloppiness. If a company is sloppy with something like a write-up, this suggests they may also be sloppy in other, more complex (and more important) areas of the process.
Frankly, I don't give a sh!t about the spelling and grammar errors. But since you want to focus on that comment, there's the reason why it matters and isn't trivial.
Savage! What the hell are you really up to man? I answered your question specifically in PMs so don't act like you don't know, please. As far as the write-up, blame me for the spelling and grammar errors. It was a bit rushed and I'm not an English major.
Let me put this to rest right here and now. I formulated Activate a long time ago for a different company. I have released a ton of articles and advice and bloodwork that is directly applicable to MFX and it's mechanisms. You don't need a leap of faith, nettles benefits are well established and if you look, I referenced dozens of articles about the anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, pro-prostate, pro-cardio, etc.. benefits of nettle already.
As far as suppliers, yes, it took years to find good suppliers but I know who they are and have half a dozen trusted sources at this point. Still, I test batch samples before we ever buy a lot from even those good sources.
Is the material independently analyzed? Damn straight! Don't ever take a manufacturer's CofA at face value. I have been a raw material analyst in the Quality Control division of a major pharmaceutical company for the last 9 years. So yeah, to say I know exactly what I'm doing is an understatement. I know the USP like the back of my hand and QC is my passion! There is no corner cutting when I'm in charge, I do have a rep to uphold.
My products are always solid, unless you can name one that isn't?
Yes, out compounding modules are approved by me alone and our cappers follow current GMP and CRF protocols. Not only that, the finished goods are tested again by a third lab to insure that they are consistent so AX is totally confident not only in the raws that go in but the product that comes out.
Like I said, about research, I've researched and developed this technology for the last 2.5 years so I've looked at more that "a few abstracts" bud. The formula works and works well and the ref's and logs are out there if you look. I will not elaborate since I was told not too but as I said, this is already well established info that's out there anyway if you look and has been posted everywhere when I first made this type of product for another company.
MFX is just the pinnacle of that original concept. AX has gone a step further from my original formula. The DVTHF in the product increases free test levels no doubt. Why does nettle also increase total test and lower estrogen at the same time? Because of the sterols present, mainly b-sito's (diosgenin).
Do you need an AI to make this happen? Nope! The recommended HD stack only amplifies steroidogenisis though a cAMP path while the AI boost test even higher, but estro sides are controlled alone by MFX, regardless if it's stacked or not. The bloodwork abounds so it's pointless to argue that.
Does the sterol component elevate LH levels? Probably, at least indirectly though proven reductase lowering activity and possible SERM like activity too on FSH levels but that's not it's primary mode of benefit.
What is the main mode of action? 25R has a direct anabolic effect on ARs (high receptor affinity with low intrinsic androgenic activity). And yes, there are articles to show this.
Why do we fortify with a sterol? Because the extraction process that isolates the high concentration of lignan removes the sterols. This mean that using NRX alone is only doing half the job it should be.
Why do we use a specialty sterol to fortify the extract? Because diosgenin itself is great, but the form we use is more anabolic based on the Russian studies showing it's anabolic character and also far more resistant to metabolic breakdown thus greatly improving effectiveness. Efficacy is further enhanced by the addition of a well established absorption enhancer and well proved CYP enzyme inhibitor, thus the free test generated as well as the sterol have an even greater half-life and are less likely to undergo adverse metabolism. This lowers estro potential even more!
It all makes perfect sense when you see the bloodwork and the logs that it works just like it was designed to. The product is not only effective, it goes beyond safe to the point it is actually healthy! If anti-arteriosclerosis, anti-prostate cancer, lower cholesterol, and lower BP are side effects, then I admit, it has them! Gimme a break.
You can not win this battle Savage, so think real hard about what you're trying to accomplish with this attack before you continue bro.
