Hey there! I'm good, how about you my man?
Yes sir, I agree with your assertion. Anytime that allegory, parables, analogies, etc are not strictly apparent, then the Bible should be taken literally to avoid misinterpretations. At least until you can understand it otherwise. In this case, I am aware of the decay chains of radionuclides and see the fossil evidence so it appears the Earth is quite old indeed, with many civilizations preceding ours. The Bible actually supports this if you read it carefully. For example, Genesis 1:28 reads... "And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it." The word replenish means to refill, and clearly admits that something was already there before us, otherwise it would say 'fill' instead of 'refill'. Man was replacing something. Dinosaurs and possibly other races we have not yet defined existed here before us, I see no reason to conclude otherwise. Preachers who tell people the Earth is only 6,000 years old are doing Christianity a serious disservice, and confusing many. I know they have good intentions in many cases, so I will not judge the error, but it is an error nonetheless and turns-off a lot of intellectuals to further consider the possibilities of Christ. That's my whole point in this thread, religion frustrates me too! The fact is that this kind of thing only negates the reliability of the church though, not the Bible or God necessarily.