omg the irony.. its killin me.
too much iron is indeed not good...
back to the topic of (cough) bcaa cals..
a calorie is indeed a calorie when one is talking about units of energy..the problem occurs, however, when people strip all forms of food down to their theoretical caloric value; then, this leads them to jump to the assertion that they can count all foods the same way so long as they reduce and compare calories
(ie, basic understanding of cals in/cals out)
so - in this vein, 1000kcals from trans fats, some claim, is the same as 1000kcals from veggies
while that may be true in a bomb calorimeter, our bodies unfortunately are not calorie measuring devices..
to summarize: my previous post was to point out that BCAAs aren't the same as cheese, candy, meat, eggs, etc - so boiling them, or any food, down to theoretical kcal values isn't all that useful....one eats foods, not calories
it's all in what context you are trying to have this discussion in, rather than a generic vacuum like some seem to prefer
The caloric amount is so small the FDA does not label it on BCAA products.
this is false
the cal count is not listed because it is not mandated by FDA, as BCAA is not food and contains only amino acids