I think if he doesnt get elected by the republicans that he may then use his momentum to run as a 3rd party candidate, which I hope so or Im simply not voting for anybody.
Do you really think they are going to end welfare? Or if they end it you pay less taxes?
There will be no difference if either of those 2 get it, except Perry is a religious nut. Good luck with that.
When it comes to policy there is no difference whatsover between Obama and Perry. Both will be funded by the same people. Both will have all the wars....both say one thing and do another, both will obey to the UN, both will yo-yo the economy, both will futher fuel the police state in America, I can go on and on. Why do I say so? Well there is no difference between George Bush and Barrack Obama, their policies of war and corporatism are all the same.
If McCain was president the same thing would have happened. This is just a continuous problem, reaction, solution. Republicans make people go crazy, so they think Democrats will make things better. Democrats make people go crazy, so now back to the republicans. No difference. Barry Soetoro aka Obama has little influence on economic policy. If you want to know who is making economic policy follow the money. The money trail leads to the bankers, corporations, Bildeberger group, Counsel on Foreign Relations, Ti-lateral commission, etc....the same people that supported Obama, supported Bush, and will support the next president who ever that is.
Agreed.In the words of George Carlin,forget about the politicians,they are there to give us the illusion that we have a choice.We don`t.The Congress,Senate,and Presidency were bought by the true owners of this Country a long time ago,and what the true owners want is more for them and less for us.
I really wish you were right, I just don't see it in the least bit. He probably will run as a 3rd party candidate if he doesn't get the Republican nomination. I think he has no chance of getting the Republican nod and as a 3rd party candidate he won't carry even a single state.
Maybe...but then again there is a big tea party movement that was started by him that is gaining momentum. Unfortunately it was quickly hijacked by Sarah Palin and CNN had her on TV making a speach portraying her as head of the movement which is a farce and the movement is only a hijack for those looking for political gain. Now Michelle Bracknomandsland hijacked it, and we have Perry and also Newt Gingrich both acting like Ron Paul to pick up anything Ron Paul was for but only to lie and twist things around.
Glenn Beck is phoney trader, he did not start anything. He is just a CIA operative, just like Chris Mathews and Anderson Cooper both are. All Glenn was trying to do is copy Alex Jones and twist and distort everything. He had a whole crew following Alex Jones taking notes on everything every day and he would touch on similar issues only to deceive the mainstream audience.
I dont trust anyone, and around the clock skepticism is cool, but Ive been listening to Alex Jones for several years now and he has been on the mark with most of the stuff he speaks about.
Amen..lol
Are you sure you dont wanna say it will come down to Romney, Perry or Obama? Unless you meant just the Repub race of course.
At least he has some time left in his term...or 2nd term to try to really top the charts.
According to the '08 exit polls my "generalizations" aren't foolish. 96% of Black voters voted for Obama. If it had been only 85%, then I would say race wasn't an issue.
The black people in my gym dont even consider Obama black. I asked them how they felt after Obama won and they "didnt care because he not even black." It wasnt a black victory to them in any way.
Its actually not that dramatic...in 2008 only 64% of blacks were registered to vote, so 36% didnt even care to register to vote for Obama....Doing math on top of my head Obama only got a 60% turnout of blacks supporting him if your 95% number is actually correct. You dont have to vote to show you disprove of him.
True but, more Black voters registered in '08 vs '04. In '04 Kerry only had something like 87% of the Black vote. I'm just saying that if the same 96% vote again for Obama, they're voting according to race. If there were only white candidates again less would turn out- like in '04 and previous years. - I think Obama will win again.
I dunno...Ive heard of black people coming out and turning against Obama, and that he has not supported the black communities...so possible he may have lost support over the last couple years.
yeah I wouldn't mind Cain and Perry together as P and VP. Things would start shaping up between those two fellas IMO.
He looks like he dominated everybody again...Id be interested in seeing if he did as well on the CNN poll as he did the NBC poll last.
you know I hate agreeing with you, but yet again I do. I want to beat Perry with a bat, wish Bachman would stop talking entirely, and Santorum is just too Mr Rodgers to go anywhere.
I dont pay attention to their behaviors nor do I look for someone who presents themselves as "presidential" I just make myself tone def and blind and listen to their message. As far as Im concerned, unless I missed something Ron Paul is the only anti-war candidate.
We talked about this before how the media promotes Pecky and Ramknee and ignores the other candidates. Seems like they took this to another level.
Im certainly hoping he is not trying to resonate with that base (edit: although Id hope some day that base goes through drastic changes.) The base Im looking after is a growing process. I think more people support his 9/11 comments that what the people in the audience tried to show, but I understand alot of people have problems when they are being told the contrary to what they have been fed over and over again the past decade.
Just to clarify what I meant...Im certainly hoping Ron Paul sticks to his ethical standards instead of catering and trying to resonate with the base just to try to win votes, support and the election. The same way Obama catered to liberals with his socialist views, and anti-war views only then to be a straight corporatist/fascist pro-war president.
Well, the most inexperienced and most irresponsible. Only time will tell if the consequences for these things will merit him to be "the worst ever". Wilson is up there on my crap list because he initiated the socialist movement with the 17th amendment. Panzy president...not look what we've got to deal with.
I completely agree! if Obama gets another term in I'll be gone from this country for good by the end of his 2nd term. By then this country will have "crossed the threshold" into a socialist state and will likely never return to natural rights philosophy, which is what this country was founded upon via the constitution. Everything that makes this country great will disappear into the past if we keep moving in this direction. Perhaps I'll get lucky and another country will embrace our constitution in it's original purpose and form when all of this goes down.
Then maybe you should leave now, now you're upset because he isn't doing what you want. We spent 8 years being bamboozeld,led into BS wars that we're still paying dearly for, having a bunch of personal freedoms taken away with the BS "Patriot Act", Please
I dont think Obama is a socialist, there is no evidence of that although he was marketed that way. He is a straight corporatist.
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Low dose test cycle for army officer selection prep | Anabolics | 21 | |
| T | SARM Selection | Anabolics | 18 | |
|
Great Selection of Nootropics | Strong Supplement Shop | 1 | |
|
Pre workout selection | Supplements | 45 | |
|
Aromatase inhibitor selection help | Post Cycle Therapy | 14 |
