Ah yes, video footage representing nothing more than baseless claims
That isn't evidence
You do realise that Trumps tax plan wanted to increase taxes from this year onward, right?
So? It's OK because Trump did it too? Most of the conservatives in here have come out strongly against ANY taxes. The difference between Trump and Biden is that Trump put it in a tax bill and called it what it is. Biden is calling it, "Increased minimum wage". Just like Obama called it, "Healthcare". Gee, thank good these guys are saving us all by mandating what someone should pay for and how much they should pay for it.
Trump did a lot of things that I like - he could have done much better on the taxes. But, as you like to say, this is pure deflection because Biden is obviously a corrupt, lying, scumbag and there is no defense but to talk about someone else's flaws.
No kidding. Did you read the post I quoted?
Because everyone got mad at Biden for wanting to raise taxes for people earning over 400k, but noone got mad at Trump for planning to raise taxes to above what they were before he got in office lol.
Where's the sense in that?
Oh yeah, and, "It's only for people who are 1-percenters" - that's how taxes always get spread to the poor. They vote for the rich to start paying their share, they do for a bit, the gov't expands spending, the rich figure out how to use loopholes, income falls, the gov't expands taxes to the middle class, etc.
Isn't people helping others socialism?
Who are these 'many people' who are willing to throw money at less fortunate people?
Capitalism is people helping others too. In capitalism, you just help each other instead of doing it for no equity. Through this prism alone, I would much rather be a capitalist than a socialist.
Believe me, cost of living on an island with a population of 5 million is not cheap. Petrol prices are $2 per litre here for basic 91 unleaded (be around $8 per gallon).
Those costs grow independently of minimum wage regardless. A minimum wage sets up a minimum that employers should pay those who work for them. They can pay more if they choose, nothing prevents that, it simply means that people are paid enough to get by while working those jobs.
The cost of living worldwide has gone up dramatically over the last 20 years and the mandated minimum wage has not increased with it.
In a lot of peoples minds, it is far more reasonable to justify a CEO making 20 million per year being given a 1 million pay rise every year than giving 100 employees a $10,000 dollar per year more salary which simply doesn't make sense. Noone denies the CEO doesn't work hard, but trickle down economics simply doesn't work. The top half get richer while the bottom half continue to scrape through while working full time.
Some people are born into poverty, that alone means that they often do not have access to the same opportunities for education and jobs or homes. That's the poverty cycle. It is much harder to claw yourself out of poverty than people realise because you dont have the safety nets a lot of other people do.
Imagine giving those who need to start at the very bottom a further kick in the teeth because you refuse to want them to be independent of relying on the govt. We should be encouraging them to get into employment which gives them enough to pay bills and save some coin, rather than saying "if we pay them too much, they'll stop relying on the govt for support".
There will always be poverty, but those who go out and work should be allowed economic freedom to participate as a functioning member of society, not kept down by everyone else
Geez, that's some expensive gas. I agree with the fact that some people have a harder road than others - I am aware of that. I also agree we need to try to help improve the situation where we can. I just disagree with the "how we do that" part.
There is no way $30 would be the living wage.
It is $22.10 here.
It is calculated at around $17 for the US.
I guess it depends on what you mean by "living wage" - can someone survive on $17/hour ($34,000/year) - sure. And that person can work 60 hour workweeks maybe and make $51,000/year. Still not a high standard of living but yeah, it would be better for a lot of people. Unfortunately, that money has to come from production or the money is worthless.