Describing you as arrogant... an adjective... is not calling you a name. I believe you people refer to that as fake news.
You're doing all the work for me, man.
Ding ding, another point for a fact. Yes, arrogant is an adjective. However, again, that fact does not support your argument; being an adjective does not eliminate it's potential use as an insult or a "name". Stupid and retarded are also common examples of adjectives used in "name calling". I think you mean to imply that nouns can also be used - such as idiot or moron or retard (instead of retarded). But hey, your language skills are about on level with your math skills I guess, so what do I expect?
Not that it matters, I'm pretty challenged. I think my IQ is probably about 6...I can't count that high but it's not very high. Yet, you're still relying on me to do all the work here and calling for help with news articles. To be honest, I feel like I'm doing all the work, you certainly aren't putting in much actual thought or effort.
I also get a real kick how Trump started saying "fake news" and 4 years ago everyone used to bash him for it; now all the libs throw the term around like it's an insult to Republicans.
Seriously man, it's been fun, but I am starting to feel a little bad about engaging. I was hoping you could have SOME kind of defense of your position so that maybe I could learn something here...I've learned a lot in this thread from both sides but...I don't even know what to say about this. You are a work of art.
You said it. Not me.
I don't think you're stupid at all. I think you're willfully ignorant. Big difference. Represented by the fixation on my choice of words over believing an apology... where sincerity cannot be proven... not facts nor evidence. And you are the only one here who comprehended it that way. Ironically, because you wanted to. It's called grasping at straws.
But again... you know, and I know, and you know I know... so it's a silly back-and-forth.
So, what is your definition of ignorance? Because, I am under the impression that it is signified by a lack of knowledge; i.e. - you are ignorant of some piece of information.
I have actually looked at the maps, analyzed them myself - not in their entirety but most of the states I thought might be questionable - and gained some knowledge and insight from that. I have HANDED those facts to you. And you basically say everyone who believes their could be fraud is a member of a cult? You have, in other responses, asked people to explain things to you in detail - which I have done. And you have not come back with a single shred of anything beyond X > Y.
Explain to me what facts I lack that make me ignorant here? Please. In detail. I'm not fixated on anything - except you have in multiple examples shown that facts and reality DO NOT MATTER to you. You will believe whatever you want to believe, regardless of the facts. If I am wrong, the door is open, give me some evidence to support your claims that everyone who thinks their COULD be fraud (again, not saying there is - but it does warrant investigation) is part of a cult that is ignoring facts. What facts could those be? Serve it up man.
I'm on truth's side. My soul isn't for sale to any political party, I tow no lines, and have no demigods.
That being said, any sane person would look at what's happening with Trump/Giuliani and realize what a sh%t show America looks like right now. During the height of a pandemic. It is truly pathological.
But I think you touched on the biggest problem we face: That people feel they need to choose a side and defend it to the grave. We don't.
You are on truth's side now? So why don't you look at the evidence and make a comment on it? Do you really think Biden could beat someone who gathered more votes than Obama from his basement? Do you think he was THAT popular? Do you really think that Biden getting TROUNCED in the majority of districts in WI and then taking Dane County by 180,000 votes with 260,000 votes for him and 78,000 for Trump - which means there was an almost 90% turnout in that district (despite every other district in the state being under 70%) and an almost 100% turnout for democrats? Does that seem very likely to you? Does it seem like you may be missing the truth if you don't investigate that further? Or is truth just what you made up your mind it is before you investigate?
At least when you said the facts don't matter (to you) you were being honest.
And yet, none of the courts agree with this perspective at all. I believe in the judicial system. It will maintain election integrity. Giuliani standing there screaming conspiracies he can't prove, with hair dye dripping down his face... yes, an absolute sh%t show.
So the truth is that OJ didn't kill Nicole Brown-Simpson? 100% impossible? And Hurricane Carter was a murderer who should not have been released from prison because a court found him guilty?
Hopefully the courts fall on the side of truth more often then not - but it's far more complicated than that.
And just because Giuliani can't prove something doesn't make it wrong. He probably would have a hard time proving
F = G(m1m2/r2)
But his inability to prove it in a court of law doesn't make it true or false. Plus, anyway, courts don't determine truth - they determine legality.
So what will the argument be when Trump ultimately fails at overturning this election? (Not that I actually think that's his objective at all.) That Biden has the courts in his back pocket too? That all of these judges are in on the big conspiracy? Because there's no way you MAGA peeps will be satisfied with your guy losing. You'd rather undermine democracy than accept defeat. Meanwhile, Trump is draining you dry... monetarily for his own gain, and emotionally. So miserable.
You do realize that Hillary Clinton pointed out rigged elections 4 years ago, right? That in 2016 and 2018 there were Democrats expressing concerns about the voting software and that last year there WAS an investigation into voter machine vendor corruption, right? This isn't exactly new. But the dems are telling you nothing to see here and you're going to believe it now? Aren't you on the side of truth? Or are you just listening to what you are told without any evidence, or worse - as you say - willfully ignoring the evidence. You've not responded to any of the evidence above, which I've posted a second time for your benefit...while calling people willfully ignorant.
Do tell. Have the judges in MI, WI, GA, NV, AZ been informed of your discoveries? This is truly breaking news.
It's confusing to you why Biden doesn't feel HE needs to prove he won?? Burden of proof... it's on him??
When has this EVER been the case in an election where the victor won by 5M+ popular votes and 74 electoral ones?
Gonna even throw you a bone here my man; see if you can get this one...handing this one right out there for ya.
Did you know that Cook's County in IL had 20% more votes counted than actual registered voters? Look it up, it's not in the news, it isn't being talked about - and I'll even level with you - that one shouldn't be. It may not be suspicious at all. Can you reason it out for us? It should be evidence for your side of the table. Since everyone else is so ignorant and you are for truth - show us all how it's done. Teach us. I'm even giving you a piece of the facts here. Lets see if you have the rest of the facts to go along with it, since you lack the ignorance that we all have.
www.heritage.org
