Another version of Pascal's Wager, covered above.
Problem: There are thousands of religions in the world - all with equal evidence (none) and all claiming the same thing (at their core). You are choosing to pick one out of thousands with the penalty for choosing WRONG to be damnation as a heretic - not just a skeptical non-believer.
Religions are like organisms. They reproduce, die, and sometimes mutate or evolve. (This is more in reference to the other person's post you had quoted). Islam and Judaism were both derrived from the two sons of Abraham: Ishmael and Israel. Christianity is derrived more from Judaism, however, there are many muslim beliefs which are akin. For instance, they do believe in Jesus Christ to a certain degree. Allah is not crazy, as sanity is arbitrary and ethnographically defined. The media has just done probably the worst job in portraying Islamic belief. I believe I made reference to this in another post, but with regards to dangerous christian groups. If you give a bad person a book of religion, he can use it for bad. :borladuck:
Your stance and defense in this thead has always been to take the scientific route, and never take accept anything for face value, which is a self-contradicting thing to say.
To keep everything truly within the scientific realm would require one to be an agnostic. Agnostism is your defense against Pascal's wager time and time again. The problem with that is now are potentially cursed to eternal damnation for failing to choose a religion. Heaven help me, I hope I never get caught behind you at a burger joint with this line of thinking: the place would close before you've decided on your order. Never take accept anything at face value? Good luck with that. Especially with the supplement/pharmaceuticals industry. You get in a lot and have it 3rd party tested via FTIR to make sure synthesis was correct, here is a lost of some fo the things you've taken at face value:
-The results were for your lot.
-The test was actually done. They didn't just print out a reading and sign off on it.
-The idea that C13 is an effective isotrope to measure the compound with.
-The theories of infrared spectroscopy are valid.
-The correct wave-length was used.
-The machine was in proper calibration.
Never accept anything at face value. Good luck getting anything accomplished aside from being born, being not dead, and dying.