DAA found useless in bodybuilders

mcc23 said:
So that study wasn't enough to sway you away from DAA?
Click to expand...

When did I even hint at that? I see 2 studies showing DAA works, and 1 study showing it doesn't. I think this whole postulation about a miniscule age difference is BS...so is the D-aspartic acid oxidase theory given the length of the 2nd DAA human trial demonstrating benefit. So I think the jury is still out for t-boosting, but I use DAA regularly as a nootropic
 
mr.cooper69 said:
When did I even hint at that? I see 2 studies showing DAA works, and 1 study showing it doesn't. I think this whole postulation about a miniscule age difference is BS...so is the D-aspartic acid oxidase theory given the length of the 2nd DAA human trial demonstrating benefit. So I think the jury is still out for t-boosting, but I use DAA regularly as a nootropic
Click to expand...

Any idea why the LH was effected so dramatically with the DAA and total T still didn't change significantly?
 
jimbuick said:
Any idea why the LH was effected so dramatically with the DAA and total T still didn't change significantly?
Click to expand...

LH wasn't affected that dramatically. They definitely weren't in line with one another, but I wouldn't call it a scientific anomaly or anything like that.
 
jimbuick said:
It doubling in 4 weeks isn't considered a dramatic increase?
Click to expand...

The design of the study is parallel, not crossover. You should always compare the placebo group to the treated group, not to the treated group to itself. The researchers are looking for DAA-LH interactions, not time-LH interactions
 
mr.cooper69 said:
The design of the study is parallel, not crossover. You should always compare the placebo group to the treated group, not to the treated group to itself. The researchers are looking for DAA-LH interactions, not time-LH interactions
Click to expand...

But, it was much more significant an increase than the placebo group?

Was the difference not significant enough?
 
jimbuick said:
But, it was much more significant an increase than the placebo group?

Was the difference not significant enough?
Click to expand...

It wasn't that significantly higher relative to placebo. Again, it is discordant with T levels, but not enough for me to say that there's a confounder at play. 3 studies, each with measurements only at the study conclusion. It's tough to say much as is
 
mr.cooper69 said:
LH wasn't affected that dramatically. They definitely weren't in line with one another, but I wouldn't call it a scientific anomaly or anything like that.
Click to expand...

i have seen the same thing happen in subjects. large LH boost, small T boost
 
mr.cooper69 said:
DAA persists in the system for 1-2 weeks after ceasing use, so you should actually note no change when you stop using it, at least at the beginning
Click to expand...

Ya, it isn't immediate. Maybe someday I'll regain the courage to give it another go....I've got like 2 lbs of bulk powder and an 80% full bottle of SNS caps too just sitting around.
 
Daa is also an excitotoxin.
I havent used it since my first pct

My system just dont agree with it
 
murk01 said:
Daa is also an excitotoxin.
I havent used it since my first pct

t
Click to expand...


Its an excitotoxin at very high concentrations, and it does not accumulate in areas involved with cognition. you dont need to worry with oral daa
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top