Creatine nitrate

djbombsquad

djbombsquad

Board Sponsor
Invalid Link Removed Any ready this article !
 
interesting study, wheres the rest of it?
 
A bit underwhelming to be honest. None of the treatments did all that much efficacy-wise. Might be worth extending the study to 3 or 6 months to compare efficacy better, but it's encouraging from a safety point of view.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
A bit underwhelming to be honest. None of the treatments did all that much efficacy-wise. Might be worth extending the study to 3 or 6 months to compare efficacy better, but it's encouraging from a safety point of view.
Click to expand...

TBH it is a bit foolish to use creatine nitrate as anything other than a source of nitrates.
 
MCC all day baby. But as others have said, nothing ground breaking.
 
This article and study are silly IMO.

Creatine nitrate by definition has less creatine in it than creatine mono hydrate. Of COURSE it won't raise creatine levels as effective at identically weighed doses. And for you to receive the same amount of molecular creatine, you'd need a dose so absurdly high that it would not be affordable or smart to do so.

The benefit of creatine nitrate is less the creatine(holds some benefit) and far more the nitrates for their nitric oxide boosting capabilities.

This is why it's extremely advantageous to use 2+ types of creatine when using CrN, such as 1-2g CrN+2-4g CrM.


If you took 5g of CrN, you'd feel like absolute **** from low blood pressure.

This article is leaving out so much necessary info its staggering, and this is coming from someone who HATES the guy who paid for the study.
 
VaughnTrue said:
This article and study are silly IMO.

Creatine nitrate by definition has less creatine in it than creatine mono hydrate. Of COURSE it won't raise creatine levels as effective at identically weighed doses. And for you to receive the same amount of molecular creatine, you'd need a dose so absurdly high that it would not be affordable or smart to do so.

The benefit of creatine nitrate is less the creatine(holds some benefit) and far more the nitrates for their nitric oxide boosting capabilities.

This is why it's extremely advantageous to use 2+ types of creatine when using CrN, such as 1-2g CrN+2-4g CrM.


If you took 5g of CrN, you'd feel like absolute **** from low blood pressure.

This article is leaving out so much necessary info its staggering, and this is coming from someone who HATES the guy who paid for the study.
Click to expand...

I've come to the realization that Vaughn doesn't like anyone haha. It's ok, we like you.
 
Brb, gonna go load with 20 grams of Creatine Nitrate
 
Muscle pharm, thermo life many company's use creatine nitrates ! I like creator so far . Than con cret!!! I never felt any thing from creatine nitrates !!
 
Chefdeez said:
I've come to the realization that Vaughn doesn't like anyone haha. It's ok, we like you.
Click to expand...

Well I do like Anthony Roberts(author of this article), I just don't agree with his assessment of the ingredient.

But I genuinely enjoy 99.9% of posters here, I'm just an ornery bastard by nature. Has nothing to do with anyone but myself
 
VaughnTrue said:
Well I do like Anthony Roberts(author of this article), I just don't agree with his assessment of the ingredient.

But I genuinely enjoy 99.9% of posters here, I'm just an ornery bastard by nature. Has nothing to do with anyone but myself
Click to expand...

Haha I know I'm the same way, just giving you crap.
 
VaughnTrue said:
This article and study are silly IMO.

Creatine nitrate by definition has less creatine in it than creatine mono hydrate. Of COURSE it won't raise creatine levels as effective at identically weighed doses. And for you to receive the same amount of molecular creatine, you'd need a dose so absurdly high that it would not be affordable or smart to do so.

The benefit of creatine nitrate is less the creatine(holds some benefit) and far more the nitrates for their nitric oxide boosting capabilities.

This is why it's extremely advantageous to use 2+ types of creatine when using CrN, such as 1-2g CrN+2-4g CrM.


If you took 5g of CrN, you'd feel like absolute **** from low blood pressure.

This article is leaving out so much necessary info its staggering, and this is coming from someone who HATES the guy who paid for the study.
Click to expand...

Why do you hate Nutrabolt? They were the funding party not TL.
 
De__eB said:
Why do you hate Nutrabolt? They were the funding party not TL.
Click to expand...

I don't hate Nutrabolt.


I am saying I disagree with AR's assessment of Creatine Nitrate.


Only thing I've stated so far is that I agree that CrN is going to be "less effective" than CrM at equal doses in total creatine plasma levels, as CrN supplies lower total creatine when compared at the same weight. CrN however will provide other benefits that CrM cannot provide.

Of course, this holds true for any nitrate source...you can use CrN, KNO3, NaNO3, Leucine Nitrate...don't matter to me.

But comparing CrN to CrM for total creatine enhancement is like comparing apples to oranges. If someone is taking CrN for their sole creatine source, it is not a good idea.
 
VaughnTrue said:
I don't hate Nutrabolt.


I am saying I disagree with AR's assessment of Creatine Nitrate.


Only thing I've stated so far is that I agree that CrN is going to be "less effective" than CrM at equal doses in total creatine plasma levels, as CrN supplies lower total creatine when compared at the same weight. CrN however will provide other benefits that CrM cannot provide.

Of course, this holds true for any nitrate source...you can use CrN, KNO3, NaNO3, Leucine Nitrate...don't matter to me.

But comparing CrN to CrM for total creatine enhancement is like comparing apples to oranges. If someone is taking CrN for their sole creatine source, it is not a good idea.
Click to expand...

You said you hate the guy who funded the study, just hassling you :p

And yeah, I do think AR dislikes CN largely because of the person pushing it.

In most contexts I've yet to see a convincing reason to pay more than $.03-.05/day for bulk creatine mono.

There's some argument to be made for something like Creatine Anhydrous or Creatine HCL if you're putting out say, a capsule based preworkout where dose size constraints are really important and you need the most possible creatine content.
 
De__eB said:
You said you hate the guy who funded the study, just hassling you :p

And yeah, I do think AR dislikes CN largely because of the person pushing it.

In most contexts I've yet to see a convincing reason to pay more than $.03-.05/day for bulk creatine mono.

There's some argument to be made for something like Creatine Anhydrous or Creatine HCL if you're putting out say, a capsule based preworkout where dose size constraints are really important and you need the most possible creatine content.
Click to expand...

ahhhhh teaches me to not read!

I like most forms of creatine, however the price doesnt make sense for most of them when compared to mono. Anhydrous is ALMOST as cheap, so I do like that form, and HCl is effective, but I believe it should be dosed very similarly to mono, which makes the price point silly on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top