Bulk 1,4AD

My first post was off a little, but I'm not sure if it makes a differance...
If a natural test booster is run for the entire duration of the cycle + four weeks after will a PCT still be needed since your are keeping test production going the entire time?
 
Hank Vangut said:
do you even know what you are taking?
1,4ad converts to into the steroid hormone equipoise/boldenone.
no serm needed if run solo you say??? :nono:

equipoise will cause a suppression of your hormones, such as endogenous testosterone.
this is why it is recommended stacking it with testosterone.
this is also why a quality post cycle therapy is important.
failure to do so could result in possible sexual dysfunction and other sides.

if you treat this like this is a harmless little supplement you will regret it later.
Click to expand...

There's some jackass reps saying you only need an AI for post cycle therapy, hence I intend to see whether they are correct in their assumptions. I usually run Tore or Nolva while throwing in 6-oxo in after two weeks. post cycle therapy always ran smoothly and I have little intent on changing my protocol. But I'm am curious if it turns out suppression is minor and 6-oxo will suffice for PCT.

And for decades people have ran cycles with no PCT and they apparently recovered just fine. Not condoning the practice and if you can minimize this downtime then why not.

*edit*
Should have read page 2 before replying. I'd like to confirm or dispel some of the myths going around, namely no SERM is required for PCT. If endogenous T production isn't completely suppressed then a SERM isn't needed? At what % does T or LH need to drop before a SERM or AI should be used?

As for taking a few weeks to kick in that is BS. Gains are around 1-2lbs per week so in the initial weeks you may not notice much of a change. Also inflammation and acne take awhile to develop so people think it's kicking in since these appear.

As for the high dose being needed it's not just the more is better mentality. Oral BA is 45% and conversion rate is 10-15% thus a higher dose is needed. Again reps say 400mg will suffice because using at a higher(effective) dose their product becomes prohibitively expensive for most.
 
Simpfan1278 said:
My first post was off a little, but I'm not sure if it makes a differance...
If a natural test booster is run for the entire duration of the cycle + four weeks after will a post cycle therapy still be needed since your are keeping test production going the entire time?
Click to expand...

It doesn't necessarily work that way. Your body senses the presence of exogenous hormones and reduces its own production.

Setting aside the questionable efficacy of most "test boosters" what they claim to do is raise test by increasing luteneizing hormone or one of the other trigger hormones in the HPTA axis.

So (even if they worked as claimed), you could simply end up with your body receiving some hormonal signals to increase test production and other hormonal signals to decrease test production.

The body is a balance of feedback loops. You can't think of it in mechanical terms (if I take X it will keep the test production turned on during a cycle).
 
milwood said:
M4OHN is a very mild methyl, actually. It is always advisable to be careful with these, but the bloodwork results from those who ran M4 was very mellow compared to anything else as I recall. If you ran the PP for 3 and the M4 for 4, I think you'd be fine.

Another possible tweak to this idea would be to start the 1,4 alone for 2-3 weeks (to get it in your system) THEN add PP for 2-3 weeks, then switch to M4OHN for 4 weeks to finish it all up. That way you'd have the 1,4 throughout, and the PP to blow up, the M4 to finish it out/tighten it up. Crazy all the things you could try. I would go with 4 weeks for the M4 to see best results, but I bet as a finisher after the PP, you could do 2-3 and see good results!
Click to expand...

You can probably get away with this as stated, but PP is more suppressive than M4OHN so it should really be run after the M4OHN. This way keeping your natural Test levels as high as possible for as long as possible. It also allows more time to build a base with the 1,4AD for PP build on top of too. then again the M4ohn may give you some libido support at the end the cycle where you need it most.
 
ersatz said:
As for taking a few weeks to kick in that is BS. Gains are around 1-2lbs per week so in the initial weeks you may not notice much of a change. Also inflammation and acne take awhile to develop so people think it's kicking in since these appear.
Click to expand...

See my above post regarding flu like symptoms common with Bold prop. Dont you think we would have seen some of these issues arise if it was kicking in right away? I have always thought this was the big drawback to Bold Prop...but I'm not sure.

If so, I would explain the initial gains as somewhat of a placebo effect. Just speculating here...
 
BodyWizard said:
He lied.

As for those that 'ran stupid' & got away with it: russian roulette only kills 18 percent of the players, right? Problem is, if you keep playing you'll eventually join the lucky 18...

Same here: your body may SHOW no bad reactions this time, maybe not the next time either, or the next 5 times after that - but if they keep playing that stupid "game", they WILL eventually get 'lucky'.

Don't be one of them!

YES
Click to expand...



No. I did not lie.



Bold200 when run alongside Testabolan does NOT need a SERM.

DriverDan has posted bloodwork to prove this I believe.



If you run Bold200 without Testabolan, there is a chance you will shut down, but it is still unlikely.


If you stack Bold200 with a methyl or even another non-methyl, then yes, a SERM is necessary.
 
Damn it! I went to buy the rest that my cycle will require(didn't have enough money last order) and it's sold out! Is it really gone forever?
 
OK i am looking to stack my tren xtreme with something. I will do a bottle of tren at three caps a day. Would this 1,4AD be a good stack with it? And if so when should I start the 1,4AD and at what dose?
 
I'm so mad! I had it in my cart, then I left to eat and since I was gone for too long my AOL logged off due to inactivity! :frustrate :mad:
 
A little off topic, but is 4-androstene-3,17-dione the same as 1,4-androstene-3,17-dione?



There aren't. Just when I thought I found some. :(
 
RoadBlocK said:
Lets have a moment of silence for the passing of the -

Bulk 1,4AD



:sad:
Click to expand...

You guys crack me up.

I'm sorry for your loss. Bulk 1,4AD is in a better place. He was too good for this world. Everybody he knew loved him. God takes the best and leaves the rest behind.

You have my condolences.
 
Hank Vangut said:
i've seen mixed reviews.
i don't think the conversion rate is as high as most expect.
Click to expand...

I liked it at a gram per day, but better results could be had with less expensive products. Virtually side effect free for the first 8 weeks, however.
 
Bwill said:
I liked it at a gram per day, but better results could be had with less expensive products. Virtually side effect free for the first 8 weeks, however.
Click to expand...

Most of these products have a spectrum of tradeoff in results vs. side effects. The safety profile on this one seems to be high with the results being moderate. That sounds darn good to me.
 
yeahright said:
Most of these products have a spectrum of tradeoff in results vs. side effects. The safety profile on this one seems to be high with the results being moderate. That sounds darn good to me.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 
I've been dosing 600mg ED (3x 200mg) for a little under 4 weeks. The only side effects I have noticed are very oily skin (oil slick replenishes in about 2 hours), acne and sometimes muscle cramps. The acne is being combated by cutting dairy out of my diet for the most part, 3g B-5 ED, niacin flush ED, lots of stridex pads and Benzacline(script).

My question is should I go with 600mg ED for an additional 6 weeks or 800mg ED for another 4 weeks?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top