Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

BMP Improved Formula & The Solution

ironkill said:
Don't question, don't inquire just sit back and watch like good little lemmings 🙄. This is an open, public forum. I see no character assassination just inquiries. Let the people speak
Click to expand...
They spoke, they asked questions, he answered, they just kept going because he didn't bend to their will and clearly stated that he was not going to. They continued to the point of being disruptive to the log. Enjopugh so that Admin said he was tired of it. If they can't accept that he said he was staying the course, then they should be courteous to those who want to see the log ran as it is. They obviously don't like how this log is being run so why stick around to be a burr in everyone else's butt?

Yeah I know it is a public forum and they have the right to say whatever they want. I don't deny that. However just because they can does not mean they should choose to keep messing up a log for others because it isn't what they want to see. I mean I have unsubbed from several logs that I thought were BS instead of sticking around complaining about how I think it should be run. I mean why would I choose to ruin it for those who are enjoying following along.
 
Yeah, I want to be clear because I feel I set off some of the debate - It is Bob's log and I have no problems with him doing his thing his way.

I disagree with some small items and they have been laid out and people can make their own conclusions from that. We disagreed but I respect his approach.

On this board we often pick apart studies that have been designed by groups of really smart and experienced people with at least some funding. Even those studies have "flaws" that can be debated.

Bob does present his approach in a way that elevates his log above the typical log on here and some criticism is fair because of that - but if this was a typical one of us logging on here, the standard would be much lower. There are people on here talking about how a muscle builder makes them "feel" and that is acceptable. Feels like deca after all.
 


Final Review

What to Expect

BMP offers an effortless and highly effective/dramatic recomposition effect. A simultaneous increase in muscle and a decrease in fat.

Mood / Energy

Throughout logging BMP I did not notice any changes to mood or energy. My levels stayed very consistent since day 1.

Recovery

Throughout the log my recovery was pretty steady. Days where I wake up at 3:30 AM I felt a little off when training later in the day, since I am already on my feet 12+ Hours before training.Overall I do rumble roll, stretch, and use a lacrosse ball on my trigger points to help with flexibility.

Strength

Very consistent since day 1 on the log. I ran this 6 week routine prior to BMP, and took notes on all my exercises and weights. With the addition of BMP I did not see a significant change to note from the supplement. Since dietary intake and training are consistent I know there was no external variable to skew this (for example adding calories every week, yielding a larger surplus, which could correlate to strength gains)

Weight Change

Over 4 weeks of taking BMP, I did not change my nutrition as my calories and macros stayed the same. During that time I lost around 1.5lbs (give or take depending on scale fluctuation)

Digestion

Throughout the log I keep my sources very steady. I eat a very low FODMAP Diet, and my overall digestion improved slightly from Day 1. Could it be from losing a bit off my waist? I don't know, but I did want to note that throughout my time while running the product.

I stick away from sources like onions, broccoli, cauliflower, egg whites, or fatty cuts of meats that can leave me gassy and bogged down. I have a food intolerance to fish, so I do not consume it because I know the disaster it can cause.


Body Recomposition

This is my biggest takeaway from the product. Over the 1-Month Run my belt notch went down, my waist is a bit tighter (32 when starting log, 31 when ending), and my overall appearance is leaner. The cuts in my quads are deeper, and I am starting to see some veins run through my chest and shoulders that were not as defined from day 1. Given the short run I would only expect this to amplify the longer you run the product. I don't know the law of diminishing returns on BMP in a controlled nutritional environment, but if you can keep getting leaner, holding strength, and tighten up its always a plus.

I train in a sweatshirt 99% of the time, but moments I did take it off (during leg day when I am pouring sweat) I had some comments on looking bigger, which is a plus.


Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

​
 
So I don’t have the best eye for these things.....but I’d say there’s a definite deference between your before and after pics.

For someone who is as on point with their nutrition and training as you are, I’d say this is a win for BMP.

Based on this log alone, I’d have no problem purchasing this product.

Great job as always Bob!
 
Nice log, all drama aside. Thanks for the input dude. Still wana know how you can pose and not look like you just received a surprise colonoscopy.
 
Great log as usual. I didn’t comment but I most certainly followed along the entire way.

I agree, there is definite difference in your appearance from the beginning to the end. The fact that one bottle caused that much of a difference, I would say that BMP is a winner!

I’m interested to see how it goes in a bulking environment but anything that can preserve strength/muscle during a cut is always a positive!
 
Excellent log, Bob...i knew you would be the ideal tester for these circumstances.

Now let's get you up into the heavyweight division.
 
Definitely agree with the findings here... there was definitely a recomp effect here and enhanced physique from initial to end. Might not have been "felt" per-se during the run by you can see it in the end.
 
Nice final review!
 
m1k3_d0z4 said:
So I don’t have the best eye for these things.....but I’d say there’s a definite deference between your before and after pics.

For someone who is as on point with their nutrition and training as you are, I’d say this is a win for BMP.

Based on this log alone, I’d have no problem purchasing this product.

Great job as always Bob!
Click to expand...
There is definitely a difference in his pictures from start to finish. Just check the hams. I can see some separation there. Now I regret not stocking up during the Pre-sale time.
 
Given the log before, I am a little suprised at the photos. This entire thing did not go as I expected - would have guessed a couple weeks of nothing notable and then some strength gains, and no visual changes...guess I was pretty much off.

To me the legs, particularly in the side pose, look much harder and grainier than in the beginning, and the back looks harder as well. At first I thought Bob was standing closer to the camera too, he looks bigger, but the wall in the photo shows he is within inches of his spot.
 
So @The Solution would you regard this as a successful NATURAL anabolic run? you know your body better than us, how long would it normally take you to get these results? like people said, I can definitely notice your traps and shoulders look tighter, quads look a bit tighter too. Arms is hard to tell because your doing a different pose and that will probably affect your chest too.
 
BMP - it did'nt do anything until, all of a sudden, it did lots of things - I mean for a natural supplement.
Reminds me of his Vector run - a number of people thought @TheSolution looked leaner and thicker in his final pics.
Both are great supplements.
 
Sparta12 said:
So @The Solution would you regard this as a successful NATURAL anabolic run? you know your body better than us, how long would it normally take you to get these results? like people said, I can definitely notice your traps and shoulders look tighter, quads look a bit tighter too. Arms is hard to tell because your doing a different pose and that will probably affect your chest too.
Click to expand...

His belt when down a notch so i'd say it's a good natural anabolic supp for leaning out in a controlled environment.
 
LeanEngineer said:
His belt when down a notch so i'd say it's a good natural anabolic supp for leaning out in a controlled environment.
Click to expand...
Yeah I know, but he has said that he is not in his best shape, so I was wondering seeing as he is very disciplined and structured, how long that would have taken without the support
 
It seems like Bob made some improvements during his run. Unfortunately the original photos are a bit on the blurry side, and the last set of photos have more of an overall grainy look to them, so it's hard to make a really good comparison based on these alone. Losing a full belt size is a good indication of how much he was able to lean up for sure though. I was a little confused how the log was set up, being at true calorie maintenance is probably just about the hardest scenario that BMP could have been tested against, you would generally expect next to nothing for physique changes in this environment.
 
max silver said:
It seems like Bob made some improvements during his run. Unfortunately the original photos are a bit on the blurry side, and the last set of photos have more of an overall grainy look to them, so it's hard to make a really good comparison based on these alone. Losing a full belt size is a good indication of how much he was able to lean up for sure though. I was a little confused how the log was set up, being at true calorie maintenance is probably just about the hardest scenario that BMP could have been tested against, you would generally expect next to nothing for physique changes in this environment.
Click to expand...

I don't think these are blurry at all.

Before

BMP Improved Formula & The Solution - AnabolicMinds.com

Evomuse BMP Improved Formula Invalid Link Removed What To Expect? BMP offers an effortless and highly effective/dramatic recomposition effect. A simultaneous increase in muscle and a decrease in fat. What was improved? 1) This was partially addressed with the Cyclodextrin complexation...
anabolicminds.com anabolicminds.com

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

After





Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

​
 
max silver said:
being at true calorie maintenance is probably just about the hardest scenario that BMP could have been tested against, you would generally expect next to nothing for physique changes in this environment.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but that’s just not true. The point of the supplement is to create a signal for anabolism. This signal will happen regardless of diet setup. If he were eating extra, one would expect extra growth, no doubt. But but even when eating a maintenance amount or even a deficit, you’d still receive the anabolic signal. The result would likely be either retention of muscle while cutting body fat, or possibly utilizing calories from stored fat to try to fuel the anabolism, which seems to be what happened here.
 
The Solution said:
I don't think these are blurry at all.

Before

BMP Improved Formula & The Solution - AnabolicMinds.com

Evomuse BMP Improved Formula Invalid Link Removed What To Expect? BMP offers an effortless and highly effective/dramatic recomposition effect. A simultaneous increase in muscle and a decrease in fat. What was improved? 1) This was partially addressed with the Cyclodextrin complexation...
anabolicminds.com anabolicminds.com

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

After





Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

​
Click to expand...
The two sets of photos appear to be taken with a different camera in different lighting conditions. I have them open on a large high resolution monitor though, that certainly would make a difference in how the photos look. I first picked up on the differences in how different your face looks detail wise in the two sets of photos, in the first set details are washed out while the second set has almost a grainy look to them.
 
max silver said:
The two sets of photos appear to be taken with a different camera in different lighting conditions. I have them open on a large high resolution monitor though, that certainly would make a difference in how the photos look. I first picked up on the differences in how different your face looks detail wise in the two sets of photos, in the first set details are washed out while the second set has almost a grainy look to them.
Click to expand...

Same Phone (Iphone XS)
Same Gym, Same Spot, Same lightbulbs
 
Last edited:
Jeremyk1 said:
Sorry, but that’s just not true. The point of the supplement is to create a signal for anabolism. This signal will happen regardless of diet setup. If he were eating extra, one would expect extra growth, no doubt. But but even when eating a maintenance amount or even a deficit, you’d still receive the anabolic signal. The result would likely be either retention of muscle while cutting body fat, or possibly utilizing calories from stored fat to try to fuel the anabolism, which seems to be what happened here.
Click to expand...
Ok thanks for letting me know that recomposition at maintenance calories is actually easy. My mistake.
 
max silver said:
Unfortunately the end result is different though. Could there be a digital zoom affecting results of one set? In one set of photos you appear to be closer to the camera.
Click to expand...

I put my phone in the same spot on my shaker bottle, put on a 10-second timer, and walk in front of my camera. Same thing I have been doing for years.
 
max silver said:
Unfortunately the end result is different though. Could there be a digital zoom affecting results of one set? In one set of photos you appear to be closer to the camera.
Click to expand...
I guess we know that BMP definitely improves focus then
 
Last edited:
The Solution said:
I put my phone in the same spot on my shaker bottle, put on a 10-second timer, and walk in front of my camera. Same thing I have been doing for years.
Click to expand...
Have you tried setting it to video record, posing while it takes video footage, and then in video screen shooting the poses?
 
ValiantThor08 said:
Have you tried setting it to video record, posing while it takes video footage, and then in video screen shooting the poses?
Click to expand...

Wouldn't that just be more work for the same result? That would keep him in the same position for one set of photos, but then he would have to go through and choose frames to get a still image from.

The hardest part is getting the camera in the same spot and standing the exact same each time, which is nearly impossible for any body when you're doing it days apart. Ideally it would be the exact same for the before and after, which changing to video wouldn't fix.
 
rascal14 said:
Wouldn't that just be more work for the same result? That would keep him in the same position for one set of photos, but then he would have to go through and choose frames to get a still image from.

The hardest part is getting the camera in the same spot and standing the exact same each time, which is nearly impossible for any body when you're doing it days apart. Ideally it would be the exact same for the before and after, which changing to video wouldn't fix.
Click to expand...
It would take away having to press a button or use voice activation each time you do a different pose.
 
Resolve10 said:
Surprised at the improvements considering how you never noted anything during updates.

Seems like it still had some benefits and now I’m even more intrigued with giving this a shot!
Click to expand...
He said more than once that his weight was getting a bit lower, and that if his pictures showed him looking leaner then he was getting some recomp... it was the basis for a few of the statements in my responses that he had already said he thought he was recomping and wanted to see the final result to be sure. There is no inconsistency with those statements and his review or results.
 
Oh yeah by the way @The Solution, great log. Heck I might even have to check into buying some of this and I don't typically entertain the idea of natty anabolics any longer.
 
MrKleen73 said:
He said more than once that his weight was getting a bit lower, and that if his pictures showed him looking leaner then he was getting some recomp... it was the basis for a few of the statements in my responses that he had already said he thought he was recomping and wanted to see the final result to be sure. There is no inconsistency with those statements and his review or results.
Click to expand...
The log only produced results when the pics came out bro. Just like the Vector log...
 
Ptlhains said:
The log only produced results when the pics came out bro. Just like the Vector log...
Click to expand...
Go reread the parts you missed, or don't bother me with your incorrect info... Everything I said is fact and you can go back and look. If you don't want to then don't bore me with another response directed to me.

Have a wonderful day!
 
Resolve10 said:
I was really just indicating it’s interesting to see the changes despite not feeling certain subjective measures.

FWIW he never noted his weight was getting lower until he posted that final review, just stated it was stationary, but it does seem he achieved some recomposition at the end of the day.
Click to expand...
Again, he certainly did mention it and I responded to it. You must have missed it, if you care to see then go back and look at his updates and the conversations around them. You must have missed it. No reason for me to make something up much less tell people they can verify it by going back to read it.

Here to make things easy, he listed it in his 3rd week update... Invalid Link Removed
 
max silver said:
The two sets of photos appear to be taken with a different camera in different lighting conditions. I have them open on a large high resolution monitor though, that certainly would make a difference in how the photos look. I first picked up on the differences in how different your face looks detail wise in the two sets of photos, in the first set details are washed out while the second set has almost a grainy look to them.
Click to expand...
I certainly agree that the post BMP photos have higher contrast and are sharper than the pre BMP photos. Not that I think Bob did that on purpose, but for whatever reason...it happened.

Also his skin tone has the look of having been in the sun (almost tan) in the post photos, whereas in the pre photos his skin is rather fair. We all know what a little color can do to enhance the look of our physique!
However, I don’t think Bob snuck in a few tanning sessions. I have also been taking the new BMP, and people have been making comments about my skin and implying that I have been getting some sun- I have not been lately.

I am still trying to gauge my own conclusions about the new BMP (while in PCT), but I find it noteworthy that he lost an inch off his waist without changing anything else. Equally as noteworthy, Bob was apparently not all that interested in extending his run. 🤷‍♂️
 
BMP side effect is a tan;)
 
I do not think it is a tan. His legs, which have the biggest increase IMO, actually look whiter in the after pics to me. I think they look more lile stone then the before.

The upper body, on the other hand, seems to have some redness, like maybe blood flow to the upper body/skin?

I don't know. All I know is, I am eating in a mild deficit and gaining strength pretty regularly...I had hopes that Bob would have a similar experience since his consistency is bar none - but I think he had some visual results in a month which I wouldn't expect. I always expect strength increases to come before visual increases. Strength can change in small steps weekly, visual changes often take a longer time in a trained individual.
 
Ricky10 said:
I am still trying to gauge my own conclusions about the new BMP (while in PCT), but I find it noteworthy that he lost an inch off his waist without changing anything else. Equally as noteworthy, Bob was apparently not all that interested in extending his run. 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...

I don't think it is that noteworthy...he never said he hasn't considered extending. Actually, he DID say that he thinks the effects would be .ore pronounced over time.

However, a healthy skepticism of a natural anabolic is warranted and understood. I can only attest to my own experience and BMP and Creatine are the only natural muscle builders I have used that did anything for me. They are noticeable. Magic? No. But noticeable.
 
Ricky10 said:
I certainly agree that the post BMP photos have higher contrast and are sharper than the pre BMP photos. Not that I think Bob did that on purpose, but for whatever reason...it happened.

Also his skin tone has the look of having been in the sun (almost tan) in the post photos, whereas in the pre photos his skin is rather fair. We all know what a little color can do to enhance the look of our physique!
However, I don’t think Bob snuck in a few tanning sessions. I have also been taking the new BMP, and people have been making comments about my skin and implying that I have been getting some sun- I have not been lately.

I am still trying to gauge my own conclusions about the new BMP (while in PCT), but I find it noteworthy that he lost an inch off his waist without changing anything else. Equally as noteworthy, Bob was apparently not all that interested in extending his run. 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...

It more likely the compliments about your skin (tone) is from you recently adding in Evomuse IDRT face lotion. That product has a hint of color to it. I was getting those compliments when using it also.
 
ELROCK said:
It more likely the compliments about your skin (tone) is from you recently adding in Evomuse IDRT face lotion. That product has a hint of color to it. I was getting those compliments when using it also.
Click to expand...
Also very true :)

However, I started getting these comments before I introduced IDRT...which is very intense! I have not been using IDRT much lately to be honest. Though I never got the rash-like symptoms that some users questionably reported being induced from the new BMP, I wanted to hold off on going full throttle with IDRT until I knew for sure that I wasn’t having any adverse skin reactions from the BMP itself.

I believe the pro-histamine action from the new version of BMP increases vasodilation/blood flow and consequently impacts skin tone. Histamine itself can increase the how reactive your skin is to external factors as well of course.

*Not that I claim to know exactly how the BMP formula in its entirety functions at all...haha
 
Ricky10 said:
Also very true :)

However, I started getting these comments before I introduced IDRT...which is very intense! I have not been using IDRT much lately to be honest. Though I never got the rash-like symptoms that some users questionably reported being induced from the new BMP, I wanted to hold off on going full throttle with IDRT until I knew for sure that I wasn’t having any adverse skin reactions from the BMP itself.

I believe the pro-histamine action from the new version of BMP increases vasodilation/blood flow and consequently impacts skin tone. Histamine itself can increase the how reactive your skin is to external factors as well of course.

*Not that I claim to know exactly how the BMP formula in its entirety functions at all...haha
Click to expand...

Just to be clear here as well - the term "some users" keeps getting thrown around regarding a rash.

As far as I can tell, ONE persone thought it was giving him a rash and was fairly convinced of it, but finally reintroduced it and had no issues.

Beyond that there was some reports of tattoos raising up - but it was not a rash, etc.

All on all, ONE person MISTAKENLY thought they got a rash from it and people keep referring to it as "some users experienced a rash."

This is not personal...you just hallen to have said it and be the one I happen to say something about.
 
HIT4ME said:
Just to be clear here as well - the term "some users" keeps getting thrown around regarding a rash.

As far as I can tell, ONE persone thought it was giving him a rash and was fairly convinced of it, but finally reintroduced it and had no issues.

Beyond that there was some reports of tattoos raising up - but it was not a rash, etc.

All on all, ONE person MISTAKENLY thought they got a rash from it and people keep referring to it as "some users experienced a rash."

This is not personal...you just hallen to have said it and be the one I happen to say something about.
Click to expand...
Oh I completely agree, and I was part of that conversation. At the time though, it was at least something in the back of my head. I had to back off on the IDRC for the time being to eliminate that factor.

I have 12 bottles of BMP, and I personally didn’t expect much from my first bottle anyway. PWO dosing is definitely where it is shining for me so far. Also, my diet has been rather dirty lately but my waistline has remained quite lean (for me). I am keeping a very open mind for BMP, and I look forward to the high probability of increased benefits over the next few weeks/months..
 
Last edited:
Good log Bob. Take a pill, keep diet and training normal, get a little leaner at same weight. Idk what else you could ask for.
 
6 Week Update
Started Log: 175
3 Week Update: 173.5
Weight Now: 172

Macros not changed
Training still the same routine to gauge the strength

Will update in 2 weeks for the final update on anything else I have noticed on the 2nd bottle.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top