squirtguns89
Member
^^ Right.
If your strength goes up, endurance goes up, and you don't increase volume or weight on your lifts.. why? Isn't the point to increase volume and/or weight?
"I'm just gonna take this supplement right here who's benefits are endurance and strength gain, and just like, keep everything the same and not take the benefit of increased endurance" Makes sense......... yea......... If you want to try and make the supp look like it does less maybe.... Oh wait was that the point? My baaaaaaaad
I don't think a single person here works out to stay the same. Unless I'm mistaken and that's the goal..
im with ya. This is being way over complicated. I do agree, going from one extreme to the other. ie, hard bulking to cutting (loss of endurance) or hard cutting to bulking (gaining endurance) would skew results. BUT that wasnt the context of original comment, saying their needs to be a baseline when under normal circumstances who isnt trying to increase workout? this is just over complicating something for the sake of it.
kisaj most people wouldnt notice the effects of increased endurance/strength assuming theyre on a regular diet? or notice feeling worn out from said increased workout.. thats pretty basic.
i feel like these straw man arguments are only relevant if the variables are to the extreme. ie changing dieting protocols, changing from power lifting to bodybuilding typical training, or if someone has no concept of macros in general. I dont think this would apply to the original concept of what i responded to.