mr.cooper69
Legend
- Awards
- 0
Crazy right?This statement seemed so outlandish that I googled it....I found some .com and .org soruces that seem to back up the info. Shocking fact imo.
"Autopsies in 70-year-old patients show that 46% of males have prostate cancer, but fortunately, it is very slow growing compared to other cancers. About 90% of prostate cancers remain latent over decades. Microscopic foci of adenocarcinoma can be found in 85-90% of men over 80 years of age, which confirms that most men with prostate cancer die from causes unrelated to the malignant tumour."
So while I'm not even close to being convinced that agmatine has anything to do with prostate cancer, you can learn something new in every thread.
Anyway, I can't stress enough that this extrapolation of agmatine is nonsensical! Arachidonic acid is an intermediate in agmatine imidazoline signaling....SO WHAT? Arachidonic acid is an intermediate in a million signaling processes. What about all the other net effects of agmatine?
In fact, all the data I see on agmatine shows ANTI-cancer effects. This is because, like any compound, agmatine has mixed roles in the body. And the net effect of these various roles leads to the prevention, not production, of carcinoma.