Don't be so hard on yourself. It was convincing.
Sweden & South Korea
Others were holding Sweden up as a good example, and people did listen to that mistakenly.
I used South Korea because they responded quickly, and everyone conformed to the test and contact tracking which is what was needed here on a nationally driven level, but then again, Trump said no. States are responsible... That's not how one leads a country through a pandemic.
Keyword: Sooner
I think the keyword is sooner, not more per se, but Trump was warned the seriousness by intel and other organizations about Covid-19. He knew but ignored the science. He doesn't understand the science, and he doesn't care either.
Invalid Link Removed
So, if we had responded one week earlier. 1 week. 36,000 more would be alive today in the USA.
How anyone can't hold him responsible for this alone, is just ignoring facts.
Invalid Link Removed
I'd ask everyone in here to be honest. If it were another president. How would you feel about the response?
I'd be f*cking p*ssed no matter who it was, but then again President Obama had a plan, Trump's team tore up, and don't have anything but some binder with nothing in it. Go ahead and Trust him with your life. I wouldn't. He doesn't care.
Trump's Covid-19 Plan
Where is that plan? Did they publish it? I'd love to see a link to it...
The CDC Plan was shelved and shut down too, but it leaked.
I feel like you are falling for the media hype quite a bit here and trying to pin it on one guy.
How can you ignore that when Trump was trying to close borders and eliminate unnecessary travel, he was being called a xenophobe? If he had the Intel and that was his plan, we could have argued whether it was right or wrong (clearly, in hindsight, it should have been more aggressively implemented) - but with all of the knee-jerk resistance he faces you can't fight his plan and then blame him for not implementing it.
And I have to say, I have never received a check from the gov't so quickly - even when it is my own money they are sending back to me.
Consider the timeline:
January 20-28, the WHO and chinese authorities announce confirmation that human-to-human transmission of the corona virus had already occurred.
January 29-31 - The U.S formally announced a White House Coronavirus Task Force.....President Trump repeatedly claimed credit for acting early with the travel ban. However,
The Washington Post reported that 300,000 people traveled to the U.S. from China during the month prior to the ban.
The New York Times reported that more than 40,000 persons traveled from China to the U.S. after the January 31 partial ban, and around 430,000 total between the December 31 disclosure of the outbreak by China and April 4.
Invalid Link Removed
So, yeah, if we acted a week earlier, a lot of people would have been alive - but how do you view that as "Trump had all kinds of information and should have acted sooner"? And if there was more info, then why were the Dems fighting him? I mean, by this point it was public knowledge that human-to-human transmission has occurred and presumably the senate and congress should have had more information than that as well?
You could also say that if we acted 2 months earlier, a bunch of lives would be saved. Maybe all of them.
But even in the light of 108,000 dead we are having protests over the closures. What would we be saying if he closed everything down and we had 15,000 deaths? Everyone would be saying what a crappy president he is because he destroyed the economy over 15,000 deaths. And maybe he shouldn't have that on his mind so much and should have saved 90,000+ lives instead, but hey - who really made that bed? Pelosi, Biden and all of the people who have been so unreasonable toward his actions.
What were Pelosi or Biden doing at the end of January? I don't know....let's look at Pelosi's press releases:
“The Trump Administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law. The sweeping rule, barring more than 350 million individuals from predominantly African nations from traveling to the United States, is discrimination disguised as policy.
“America’s strength has always been as a beacon of hope and opportunity for people around the world, whose dreams and aspirations have enriched our nation and made America more American. With this latest callous decision, the President has doubled down on his cruelty and further undermined our global leadership, our Constitution and our proud heritage as a nation of immigrants.
“In the Congress and in the Courts, House Democrats will continue to oppose the Administration’s dangerous anti-immigrant agenda. In the coming weeks, the House Judiciary Committee will mark-up and bring to the Floor the NO BAN Act to prohibit religious discrimination in our immigration system and limit the President’s ability to impose such biased and bigoted restrictions. We will never allow hatred or bigotry to define our nation or destroy our values.”
Invalid Link Removed
As a matter of fact, I looked from January 15th - February 24th before I saw any mention of Sars, Coronavirus or Covid in any of her press releases - because she didn't even mention it when she criticized his ban on travel on January 31st. I mean, presumably, if Trump should have acted sooner because all of the information was there, she should have at least known it was worth mentioning, right?
But, on 2/24 here is her statement:
"Americans need a coordinated, fully-funded, whole-of-government response to keep them and their loved ones safe. The President’s request for coronavirus response funding is long overdue and completely inadequate to the scale of this emergency."
Invalid Link Removed
And this statement goes on to criticize him for "slashing" funding for the CDC (a lot of help that funding did us) as she looks to score further political points, and THEN she delayed the bill!!!
And yet, she still didn't recognize the scope of this because she says, "The President should not be raiding money that Congress has appropriated for other life-or-death public health priorities." Huh? Does she think there are unlimited funds? Is this someone who should REALLY be in charge?
She talks in circles and criticizes him for not funding something fast enough, criticizes him for slashing funding, then fights him and delays the funding while claiming she is looking out for the citizens. No she is looking to protect her power. And then she states he shouldn't be taking funding from other sources to fund this? Where would we be if he hadn't cut spending prior to this?
I don't get how we can put it all on Trump. It isn't like the democrats, as proven by Pelosi's silence on Covid for over a month after he tried to stop unnecessary travel and she criticized him for it, were up in arms at the time saying this is a big problem and he is ignoring it. They are just being revisionist and our memories are so pathetically short that many of us are falling for it. Or we just want to believe what we want to believe.