This article outlines my issues with Tulsi quite well:
How Gabbard went from rising star to controversial figure.
www.vox.com
Defending dictators, Islamaphobia, homophobia (this one she may have evolved on) not as anti-war as she claims, etc.
The very people the article is defending they themselves defend, prop up and give money to dictators. Its all hypocrisy. We have no business in Syria, Obama created the civil war in Syria and destroyed it along with Lybia prior and several other nations murdering and displacing millions of muslims that that article is hypocritically giving Tulsi a hard time for.
People support Obobo and now are voting for Bitten, they are far worse than Assadd on a global scale who have no only caused that destructive atrocity in Syria but were the globes leading mass serial killers at that time.
She grew up in a anti-gay environment, so did I in the 80s and early to mid 90s. Then I started meeting a few in the mid 90s got to know them and my views changed. That was the culture back then, its still a problem today but many people have changed. I have changed. Tulsi says she changed too so lets move on from that.
She isnt as anti-war as I would like her to be, Ill say that but she is certainly the least out of those running by far with Bernie behind her out of the Demican bunch.
I dunno why its wrong to call terrorists radical islamists. I mean they are radical islamists and thats that. It doesnt mean you think muslims are terrorists, its just a specific group. She should have added that the US, CIA, Pentagon and the Military Industrial Complex propped up, financed, armed and trained these terrorists from Muhahideen and Osama Bin Laden in the 70s to ISIS today.
Im sorry but that Vox article is total State propaganda.