That amendment was written when it took 1-3 minutes to load a rifle and shoot it. We can amend them thanks. I know that much smart guy.
It was also written when what they had was closer to the equivalent of what they would need to fight against, so you can argue that you should amend them to allow for greater equal powers in society to continue to match the evils with an equivalent force.That amendment was written when it took 1-3 minutes to load a rifle and shoot it. We can amend them thanks. I know that much smart guy.
You should ask the 11 million+ Uighurs in Xinjiang Province what they think. Id bet they quickly agree with you, for sure!That makes no sense when you really think about it.
For somebody who thinks this is the era of Donbarf Dump's white supremacist nazi apocalypse I actually would have thought you would be jacked with metal by now, lolThat makes no sense when you really think about it.
If there is a white supremacy apocalypse perhaps that triggered it and empowered them rather than Dump's consistently retarded tweets (sure doesnt help.) Plus free around the clock advertisement on mainstream media.my memory is weak and I admit this...but when Hillary Clinton called trump supporters deplorables it was the 1st time I can remember a politician attacking a rival politicians supporters...since then it has been a politcal 'war'
Someone's never heard of the puckle gun, I see. You know what else that amendment applied to back then? Warships, cannons, etc. Fleets of them, even.That amendment was written when it took 1-3 minutes to load a rifle and shoot it. We can amend them thanks. I know that much smart guy.
Please define for me?Someone's never heard of the puckle gun, I see. You know what else that amendment applied too back then? Warships, cannons, etc. Fleets of them, even.
It was never simply about small-arms.
Lastly, you are 100% correct that it can be amended, but so far as I know, 0 politicians are discussing amendment of the Constitution. They are actively discussing simple majority legislation that violates the Constitution. If you think you can get an amendment ratified to repeal or modify the 2nd, then I fully support you advocating for it, but don't get your hopes up.
All that has nothing to do with you erroneous use of the term 'assault rifle' though, which is a term you clearly do not understand, as that was my comment to you. The explanation of the 2A was for the Australian observer of US politics; that's why it was posted in response to his quoted post.
Space force is no joke sir! I've seen star wars have you?!< hopes ^ is joking... You're joking... right?.. lol.
of the 917 hate groups 450 [roughly 50% are white] with the largest number being in California [of all places]If there is a white supremacy apocalypse perhaps that triggered it and empowered them rather than Dump's consistently retarded tweets. Plus free around the clock advertisement on mainstream media.
An 'assault rifle' has to have select-fire capacity. That is, it needs to be able to fire in semi-automatic as well as automatic cycling.Please define for me?
I am no firearms expert.
How do you know they are Trump supporters?talk about hate...Hollywood is getting ready to release THE HUNT.
elite liberals stalking and killing trump supporters.
'nothing better than going out to the manor and slaughtering a dozen deplorables'.
geez
because I can read!!!How do you know they are Trump supporters?
Link it....I just checked it out but not picking up that vibe from imdb lolbecause I can read!!!
google...'nothing like going to the manor and slaughtering a dozen deplorables'.Link it....I just checked it out but not picking up that vibe from imdb lol
You'll make excuses all day long over real killings and what supposedly doesn't influence their cause, but your panties are in a bunch over a movie?!talk about hate...Hollywood is getting ready to release THE HUNT.
elite liberals stalking and killing trump supporters.
'nothing better than going out to the manor and slaughtering a dozen deplorables'.
geez
lol...imagine that!!!Damn. Now I see. I didn’t get that picture from the imdb “info” either when I looked.
aww..sounds likeyour the one who's panties are inYou'll make excuses all day long over real killings and what supposedly doesn't influence their cause, but your panties are in a bunch over a movie?!
lol...panties in a bunch-I haven't heard that since high school in the 70's. people still say that?You'll make excuses all day long over real killings and what supposedly doesn't influence their cause, but your panties are in a bunch over a movie?!
I'm not the one freaking out over a movie! I'll be the one laughing when Trump takes your guns away though. Good thing the government doesn't have access to your medical records...oh wait lmaoaww..sounds likeyour the one who's panties are in
lol...panties in a bunch-I haven't heard that since high school in the 70's. people still say that?
far out, man!!!
I pretty much like the original laws as written for the most part, and make sure it applies to everyone who is a legal citizen and have these laws protected as is for the modern age.....but really the Constitution and Bill of Rights is already long dead and is just a museum piece anyway. It only applies when convenience for the government and ceremonial purposes. Basically, I support restoration rather than protection since there is nothing to protect anymore, lolSo the founding fathers cried for liberty, while they held slaves. Demanded the power of the vote for only a chosen few. And established a reasonable " well regulated" right to bear arms. Are we really considering their opinions, or interpretations there of, at the time, to be gospel?
If someone is getting a SS check for mental illness it means they're so mentally ill they can't hold down a job. Similarly, someone declared unfit to handle their own finances is not just someone being bad at budgeting. Typically it's reserved for elderly people with severe dementia or compulsive gamblers."The Obama rule that Trump nullified had added people receiving Social Security checks for mental illnesses and people deemed unfit to handle their financial affairs to the national background check database."
The problem is that the term "mentally ill" gets easily exploited and people who have financial difficulties shouldnt be suppressed their 2nd Amendment rights. You just end up with violent gun free broke slums like liberal cities such as NYC and Chicago where poor people cant defend themselves from gangs running the joints and people are too scared to call the cops because they will shoot them too. Plus national databases run by the government are dangerous to public safety.
You're saying they're all triggered by one woman saying something mean about them? Seems extreme to me.my memory is weak and I admit this...but when Hillary Clinton called trump supporters deplorables it was the 1st time I can remember a politician attacking a rival politicians supporters...since then it has been a politcal 'war'
Id be down for mentally ill people or cumpulsive gamblers convicted of a crime with proper due process in front of a jury (not like something similar to FISA court) or plot have their gun rights away taken from them. Other than that why are people afraid of elder people with severe dementia? To strip them of their gun license is comical. If one came up to me with a gun Id probably just laugh. My last sentence is a joke, but its a point Im trying to make.If someone is getting a SS check for mental illness it means they're so mentally ill they can't hold down a job. Similarly, someone declared unfit to handle their own finances is not just someone being bad at budgeting. Typically it's reserved for elderly people with severe dementia or compulsive gamblers.
I have to add that was an executive action, which means he is just being a dictator and forcing Federal laws over state rights. He should have been impeached for that.If someone is getting a SS check for mental illness it means they're so mentally ill they can't hold down a job. Similarly, someone declared unfit to handle their own finances is not just someone being bad at budgeting. Typically it's reserved for elderly people with severe dementia or compulsive gamblers.
I'm not sure if the whole dementia part was a joke but just in case: because dementia often comes with fits of violence and paranoia.Id be down for mentally ill people or cumpulsive gamblers convicted of a crime with proper due process in front of a jury (not like something similar to FISA court) or plot have their gun rights away taken from them. Other than that why are people afraid of elder people with severe dementia? To strip them of their gun license is comical. If one came up to me with a gun Id probably just laugh. My last sentence is a joke, but its a point Im trying to make.
I find her obsession with slaughtering muslim babies slightly more offensive, but I guess society is self centered where sticks and bones break people's bones.You're saying they're all triggered by one woman saying something mean about them? Seems extreme to me.
If there are fits of violence and paranoia that show they are deemed to be a danger to society and proper due process in front of a judge and jury is respected Im all down with that.I'm not sure if the whole dementia part was a joke but just in case: because dementia often comes with fits of violence and paranoia.
People have tried that in the past. It never ends well!Let's all just buy an island; start our own government; have our own navy etc... and declare ourselves independent.
It could be a new experiment.
- Steroids (legal)
- Pot (legal)
- ... (Have at it.)
Let's go.
the government does my medical records!!!I'm not the one freaking out over a movie! I'll be the one laughing when Trump takes your guns away though. Good thing the government doesn't have access to your medical records...oh wait lmao
sounds just as logical as saying something trump said triggered shootings.You're saying they're all triggered by one woman saying something mean about them? Seems extreme to me.
Another misunderstanding on your part. The phrase "well-regulated" in the 18th century meant "functioning." Decidedly not meaning an entity that was controlled by the government.So the founding fathers cried for liberty, while they held slaves. Demanded the power of the vote for only a chosen few. And established a reasonable " well regulated" right to bear arms. Are we really considering their opinions, or interpretations there of, at the time, to be gospel?
A bunch of people, including our President, blamed video games for these killings. I have no doubt they'll look in your file and if they see you took an anti-depressant while in college, you're now mentally ill. Oh you took abc for mild anxiety, that's also used for schizophrenia so we'll be taking your guns. There won't be physicians on the board deciding what is and isn't mentally ill, or if there are, they'll be hand-picked for a reason.If someone is getting a SS check for mental illness it means they're so mentally ill they can't hold down a job. Similarly, someone declared unfit to handle their own finances is not just someone being bad at budgeting. Typically it's reserved for elderly people with severe dementia or compulsive gamblers.
You still have access to it. I'm sure Trump will take very good care of your gun and health care lmaothe government does my medical records!!!
I have gave up my right to carry voluntarily.
my wife still carries so don't get any ideas, she is a better shot than I am/was.
just go live at the hog farm commune, you would fit right in.Ok, let's buy a small country... lol.
thanks, I appreciate you looking out!!!You still have access to it. I'm sure Trump will take very good care of your gun and health care lmao
I guess we'll see if Hillary shows up in any manifestos.sounds just as logical as saying something trump said triggered shootings.
Again we're talking about people who are so mentally I'll they're drawing on SS because they can't hold down a job or have such poor impulse control or poor judgement that they are court ordered out of control of their own finances. These are extreme situations not gun grabbing because someone takes an SSRI.A bunch of people, including our President, blamed video games for these killings. I have no doubt they'll look in your file and if they see you took an anti-depressant while in college, you're now mentally ill. Oh you took abc for mild anxiety, that's also used for schizophrenia so we'll be taking your guns. There won't be physicians on the board deciding what is and isn't mentally ill, or if there are, they'll be hand-picked for a reason.
I don't see it as going door to door, but if you're going through a divorce or you get involved in a legal matter whether it's your fault or not, your medical history is now relevant.
I think she is writing one, lol.I guess we'll see if Hillary shows up in any manifestos.
Its her 2nd shot at it, the first one was destroyed during that obstruction of justice incident when it was in its final editing.I think she is writing one, lol.
Like the way the NSA was only going to peek in on bad guys? Or the Patriot Act was about protecting us? I'm like the first person on here to speak up against conspiracy theory crap, but it won't take very much to manipulate the hell out of this. Oh we took your gun, but don't worry, you'll get it back after court. You can't afford to go to court? Guess we're keeping your gun.Again we're talking about people who are so mentally I'll they're drawing on SS because they can't hold down a job or have such poor impulse control or poor judgement that they are court ordered out of control of their own finances. These are extreme situations not gun grabbing because someone takes an SSRI.