Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Clomid during cycle

You continue in PCT while the AAS clears, especially longer esters.

Do you at all, even remotely, understand the concept of drug half-life?
I 100% understand, most of the ppl trying these methods are doing it with orals, do you understand drug half life. How many orals stay in ur system that long. Save your fake smart guy **** for some1 else buddy
 
I 100% understand, most of the ppl trying these methods are doing it with orals, do you understand drug half life. How many orals stay in ur system that long. Save your fake smart guy **** for some1 else buddy

Definitely finds himself to be a lot more intelligent than he really is
 
We're trying to do *you* a favor based on things we've already done in a demonstrably successful way.

I have bloodwork I could post, but honestly, from my point of view, if a person is too stubborn, dense, or stupid, to even try and understand why SERMs are successful at preventing on-cycle shutdown, despite published studies *and* user reports from this forum, then f_ck them. They can stay stupid.

Dude, all he asked for was bloodwork ( in a polite way at that); no need for name calling just cause someone wants proof/disagrees with your point of view.
We should all be able to discuss/disagree without the need of being rude
 
Dude, all he asked for was bloodwork ( in a polite way at that); no need for name calling just cause someone wants proof/disagrees with your point of view.
We should all be able to discuss/disagree without the need of being rude
When ppl act like that it's usually 1 of 2 things, either there just a miserable prick or full of **** so they gotta go in defense mode.
 
E2 levels mean nothing if the E2 cannot bind to a receptor because it's being blocked by a SERM.

A SERM allows you to manage E2 without having to tinker with anything. Pop the SERM -- done. E2 is completely controlled and balanced. Not too much, not too little.

If all the receptors are saturated and absolutely not a single e2 molecule can "act" then wouldn't that be like having zero e2? Wouldn't that bring all the negatives of having zero e2? tnx!
 
If all the receptors are saturated and absolutely not a single e2 molecule can "act" then wouldn't that be like having zero e2? Wouldn't that bring all the negatives of having zero e2? tnx!

No. SERMs activate ER-b -- the "good" estrogen receptor, while blocking ER-a -- the "bad" one. This is the "S" of SERM.
 
No. SERMs activate ER-b -- the "good" estrogen receptor, while blocking ER-a -- the "bad" one. This is the "S" of SERM.
I've noticed less bloat since taking clomid (I am jump starting my system while on TRT---I do it every few months just incase I have to come off one day......25mg/ day for 4-6 weeks). AND I notice my nips are less puffy and don't itch. AI like effect.Just an observation
 
I've noticed less bloat since taking clomid (to jump start my system while on TRT---I do it every few months just incase I have to come off one day 25mg/ day for 4-6 weeks). AND my nips are less puffy. AI like effect.Just an observation

I notice the same. Any sort of bloat is greatly diminished, especially in combination with low-dose Var.
 
No. SERMs activate ER-b -- the "good" estrogen receptor, while blocking ER-a -- the "bad" one. This is the "S" of SERM.

Great, tnx:) it seems like we have some reading to do on alpha and beta er receptors.

From wiki:
"ERα plays a role in the physiological development and function of a variety of organ systems to varying degrees, including the reproductive, central nervous, skeletal, and cardiovascular systems.[11] Accordingly, ERα is widely expressed throughout the body, including the uterus and ovary, male reproductive organs, mammary gland, bone, heart, hypothalamus, pituitary gland, liver, lung, kidney, spleen, and adipose tissue."

That's a lot of "stuff". Surely affecting all of this for the duration of the whole cycle, plus some time after cycle, can't be without sides?
 
Great, tnx:) it seems like we have some reading to do on alpha and beta er receptors.

From wiki:
"ERα plays a role in the physiological development and function of a variety of organ systems to varying degrees, including the reproductive, central nervous, skeletal, and cardiovascular systems.[11] Accordingly, ERα is widely expressed throughout the body, including the uterus and ovary, male reproductive organs, mammary gland, bone, heart, hypothalamus, pituitary gland, liver, lung, kidney, spleen, and adipose tissue."

That's a lot of "stuff". Surely affecting all of this for the duration of the whole cycle, plus some time after cycle, can't be without sides?
There are countless studies on serms, with patients being on them for YEARS without any major side effects. Matter of fact the cancer patient taking them, usually get more positive outcomes from taking them then negatives. Nolvadex is proven to help with type 2 diabetes, I want to say torem is proven to reduce LDL, plus all them have pro fertility benefits.

It modulates the receptor not just blocks estrogen from binding. Their role is much more complicated than they are painted out to be. Which is why it's nice to have Spurfy since he clearly has deep understanding of how serms work, and I don't mean this sarcasticly at all.

One thing I would be concerned with is possible receptor down regulations, in the hypothalamus, with clomid. No others seems to have this issue and clomid is still a may or may not on this.
 
Great, tnx:)Surely affecting all of this for the duration of the whole cycle, plus some time after cycle, can't be without sides?

Plenty of men take Clomid for TRT long term.

Male doses are very low, even lower when you consider our size.

A cycle really isnt that long.

Not sure, just thinking out loud really.

Someone who is shutdown needs to try this and get bloods done...I might ;)
 
There are countless studies on serms, with patients being on them for YEARS without any major side effects. Matter of fact the cancer patient taking them, usually get more positive outcomes from taking them then negatives. Nolvadex is proven to help with type 2 diabetes, I want to say torem is proven to reduce LDL, plus all them have pro fertility benefits.

I still haven't had the time to research this, so pardon my ignorance, but if serms are so great why hasn't this protocol been used before, why isn't it a staple? If you can stimulate your hypothalamus with a low dose of serm, to produce LH and FSH during a 12 week cycle, one doesn't need hcg and also might not need a T base?

It's just a healthy amount of scepticism before I would commit to this... I would like to discuss, if you're up to it, possible short and long term sides and weight them against benefits and then compare to normal cycle's with the use of hcg.
 
There are countless studies on serms, with patients being on them for YEARS without any major side effects. Matter of fact the cancer patient taking them, usually get more positive outcomes from taking them then negatives. Nolvadex is proven to help with type 2 diabetes, I want to say torem is proven to reduce LDL, plus all them have pro fertility benefits.

I still haven't had the time to research this, so pardon my ignorance, but if serms are so great why hasn't this protocol been used before, why isn't it a staple? If you can stimulate your hypothalamus with a low dose of serm, to produce LH and FSH during a 12 week cycle, one doesn't need hcg and also might not need a T base?

It's just a healthy amount of scepticism before I would commit to this... I would like to discuss, if you're up to it, possible short and long term sides and weight them against benefits and then compare to normal cycle's with the use of hcg.
 
I understand the skepticism.... I do.... I was skeptical, but in my head it made sense.

So I did research, a lot of it, and found many people had found success, even a couple pros who recommend it.

So I tried it myself. Test level 450 during a dbol/ primo run in only 25mg clomid (could’ve bumped up to 50mg)

Then you have spurfy who has also verified its effectiveness via blood work, and several other members who mentioned their success. As far as I k ow no one who has given it a shot has come back saying it didn’t work for them.

At this point with this much evidence I think if you cared at all about keeping your HTPA up and running on cycle you would at least TRY it out, spend your little 20-30 bucks on a bottle of clomid or torem and report back with your results.
 
I understand the skepticism.... I do.... I was skeptical, but in my head it made sense.

So I did research, a lot of it, and found many people had found success, even a couple pros who recommend it.

So I tried it myself. Test level 450 during a dbol/ primo run in only 25mg clomid (could’ve bumped up to 50mg)

Then you have spurfy who has also verified its effectiveness via blood work, and several other members who mentioned their success. As far as I k ow no one who has given it a shot has come back saying it didn’t work for them.

At this point with this much evidence I think if you cared at all about keeping your HTPA up and running on cycle you would at least TRY it out, spend your little 20-30 bucks on a bottle of clomid or torem and report back with your results.

I've got primo e arriving next week. I was going to do a short 8 week cutting cycle with only 200mg/week. I suppose this dose dosn't shutdown or suppress to any major degree anyway, but I might try adding tamox to the cycle or up the primo to 400 and add tamo just to experiment. But just for keeping mass on a cut I don't need 400...
 
Clomid during trest ace a no go? Also that's a lot of clomid for a 12 week cycle and pct, worth the price? Might run it during a desoxytest only cycle?
 
I've got primo e arriving next week. I was going to do a short 8 week cutting cycle with only 200mg/week. I suppose this dose dosn't shutdown or suppress to any major degree anyway, but I might try adding tamox to the cycle or up the primo to 400 and add tamo just to experiment. But just for keeping mass on a cut I don't need 400...
I was on 400 primo 50 dbol..... and 25mg clomid was enough to keep things up and running to a decent degree.

I would say on 200 primo a low-moderate dose of torem would work. Might be disappointed though, primo is usuallly not thought to really kick in till 6-8 weeks and 200mg is low for primo.

That said go for it and see how you like it. It will suppress you though, so it would be wise to run the SERM in my opinion. No sense getting low T for a couple weeks and taking the risk of adding back some fat. Plus keeping T normal, on top of the primo, will only benefit your cut.
 
I was on 400 primo 50 dbol..... and 25mg clomid was enough to keep things up and running to a decent degree.

I would say on 200 primo a low-moderate dose of torem would work. Might be disappointed though, primo is usuallly not thought to really kick in till 6-8 weeks and 200mg is low for primo.

That said go for it and see how you like it. It will suppress you though, so it would be wise to run the SERM in my opinion. No sense getting low T for a couple weeks and taking the risk of adding back some fat. Plus keeping T normal, on top of the primo, will only benefit your cut.

Yeah I know it's weak, but for keeping mass it should be enough don't u think? I'm not expecting to recomp on only 200 primo, just want to lose the last 5 pounds without losing mm. Now if 200 will do absolutely nothing in that regard then 400 it is. I just don't have any first hand experience with it so I can't say. I'm not that big so 200 might be enough for me, that's my thinking...

Regarding suppression I also don't know what to expect. I have test prop and cyp at hand if it gets to rough. First I would like to see how much primo suppresses on it's own, I'll do labs every 2 weeks. Then I can add tamox. Or do you think the results would be different if I would add tamox from the start?

Also if 25mg of clomid was enough for primo and dbol, I'm thinking 10mg tamox ed or eod?
 
Clomid during trest ace a no go? Also that's a lot of clomid for a 12 week cycle and pct, worth the price? Might run it during a desoxytest only cycle?
Trest I’m not sure. It’s pretty suppressive, I assume SERMS would still maintain some level of HTPA function. Start at a moderate dosage, if you notice ball shrinkage bump it up slowly to the max recommended (50mg clomid, not sure on torem, maybe spurfy can chime in on that.)

I would want to take every measure possible to maintain HTPA function on trest because it shuts you down completely and recovery is a bitch. Probably 1.5-2 month PCT. I don’t think you wanna go that long with low T.
 
To be honest recovery was easier than a test cycle. Have not seen real world pct trouble with trest.
 
Trest I’m not sure. It’s pretty suppressive, I assume SERMS would still maintain some level of HTPA function. Start at a moderate dosage, if you notice ball shrinkage bump it up slowly to the max recommended (50mg clomid, not sure on torem, maybe spurfy can chime in on that.)

I would want to take every measure possible to maintain HTPA function on trest because it shuts you down completely and recovery is a bitch. Probably 1.5-2 month PCT. I don’t think you wanna go that long with low T.
Trest or tren. I'm finishing up month 2 of PCT and I'm still not back to normal from an 8 week tren run.

Going to give running torem a try during my next cycle to see how it helps with recovery. Seems like the consensus is mixed in whether or not it works, but I'm just going to try it out for myself and see.
 
Pay attention. Everyone who tried it............... will attest that it works. The naysayers are all people who have NOT tried it.
 
Just recently started running clomid with my trt (I was curious about this for a while now), and my boys are coming back to life, a.k.a getting bigger again. Also noticed an up tick in my libido.........
 
Going to try a torem, rad140 and r andro cycle within the next month with bloods at the end of week 4
 
So theoretically, if I'm running a cycle and I start developing estro sides, I could start nolva/clomid etc for the duration of cycle and sides should subside and recovery should be easily obtainable...
 
From a different perspective of "gonad protection" while on cycle....this study on Royal Jelly is quite interesting. Royal Jelly happens to be in in OL K1NGSBLOOD....yet not at the recommended 1 gram dose/day per this study.

Invalid Link Removed

Taurine, Vitamin C, and Vitmin E, are is also supposed to be beneficial (these links can be found within the above link)
 
So theoretically, if I'm running a cycle and I start developing estro sides, I could start nolva/clomid etc for the duration of cycle and sides should subside and recovery should be easily obtainable...

Yes, but don't run nolva, it's poison. Clomid or torem should be used instead.
 
Yes, but don't run nolva, it's poison. Clomid or torem should be used instead.

So funny how everybody has it's own opinion on serms :) I've read that clomid suppresses pituitary's sensitivity to gnrh and nolva doesn't. Wouldn't this make tamox better suited for longer use of a serm?
 
I understand the skepticism.... I do.... I was skeptical, but in my head it made sense.

So I did research, a lot of it, and found many people had found success, even a couple pros who recommend it.

So I tried it myself. Test level 450 during a dbol/ primo run in only 25mg clomid (could’ve bumped up to 50mg)

Then you have spurfy who has also verified its effectiveness via blood work, and several other members who mentioned their success. As far as I k ow no one who has given it a shot has come back saying it didn’t work for them.

At this point with this much evidence I think if you cared at all about keeping your HTPA up and running on cycle you would at least TRY it out, spend your little 20-30 bucks on a bottle of clomid or torem and report back with your results.

I know several people who have tried this with nolva, tore and clomid and failed to maintian LH and FSH levels on cycle.

not saying it might not work for somebody or in a certain circumstance, but I've also never seen any real clinical data showing it works, either.

plenty of people complain about side effects of SERMs, so to suggest running them on cycle instead of HCG is more than a little counterintuitive.
 
I'm super interested in seeing the published research on this theory

I've read a statement in an article. Didn't go and look for the actual study it was cyting. But now I have by your request and I sae the study was done in vitro so take the findings with a grain of salt.

This is the study: Invalid Link Removed
 
I know several people who have tried this with nolva, tore and clomid and failed to maintian LH and FSH levels on cycle.

not saying it might not work for somebody or in a certain circumstance, but I've also never seen any real clinical data showing it works, either.

plenty of people complain about side effects of SERMs, so to suggest running them on cycle instead of HCG is more than a little counterintuitive.
Were they on crazy high doses of AAS? Were they taking enough SERM? In my research and personal experience there are at least 10 people that can attest to SERMS workin on cycle. This is the first I have heard where it didn't work. Odd.
 
I don't believe it lowers the amount of estrogen in your system to any significant degree. That said, estrogen is good for growth, but if you insisted on taking an AI I would only do half the normal dose so that you don't crush it completely.

I'm not sure if BB'ers had AI's back in the 70's and they popped dbol like candy, lol. For a short cycle extra estrogen shouldn't cause any significant problems, in my opinion. Correct me if I'm wrong.

SERMs raise E2, so no, they don't lower estrogen on cycle.
 
Were they on crazy high doses of AAS? Were they taking enough SERM? In my research and personal experience there are at least 10 people that can attest to SERMS workin on cycle. This is the first I have heard where it didn't work. Odd.

no, regular cycles.... even TRT doses.

it's hard for people here to say it "works," without pre, during and post cycle bloodwork, too. an actual pharm gear, SERMs, etc....

an easy check would be to look at LH, FSH and total test levels during those times.... until enough guys post that kind of labwork, it's a hard theory to prove.

I argued this a couple years back with Spurfy until we were both blue in the face.... I was pretty sure I had made my point clear then. I don't really care to revisit the whole debate, as I think it's kinda pointless....

it's not like we're eliminating PCT here.... everybody still takes the SERM post-cycle.... they just take it on-cycle, as well.
 
So funny how everybody has it's own opinion on serms :) I've read that clomid suppresses pituitary's sensitivity to gnrh and nolva doesn't. Wouldn't this make tamox better suited for longer use of a serm?

there's one study that compares Clomid to Nolva, but they use a megadose of clomd (150 mg/day) and normal dose of nolva (20 mg/day). pretty much any other study of clomid used 25 mg, so that was an odd choice...


Invalid Link Removed
 
no, regular cycles.... even TRT doses.

it's hard for people here to say it "works," without pre, during and post cycle bloodwork, too. an actual pharm gear, SERMs, etc....

an easy check would be to look at LH, FSH and total test levels during those times.... until enough guys post that kind of labwork, it's a hard theory to prove.

I argued this a couple years back with Spurfy until we were both blue in the face.... I was pretty sure I had made my point clear then. I don't really care to revisit the whole debate, as I think it's kinda pointless....

it's not like we're eliminating PCT here.... everybody still takes the SERM post-cycle.... they just take it on-cycle, as well.

I understand your skepticism. But 10 weeks into a cycle and still having my test level at 450 on only 25mg of clomid tells me my LH and FSH was still being produced in significant quantity. Spurfy gets bloodwork done and his LH and FSH are always in range. I posted a study a few pages back showing research data proving clomid maintains testiculat function (on TRT). My cycle was moderate, 50mg dbol and 400mg primo and clomid still worked at that androgen level.
 
I understand your skepticism. But 10 weeks into a cycle and still having my test level at 450 on only 25mg of clomid tells me my LH and FSH was still being produced in significant quantity. Spurfy gets bloodwork done and his LH and FSH are always in range. I posted a study a few pages back showing research data proving clomid maintains testiculat function (on TRT). My cycle was moderate, 50mg dbol and 400mg primo and clomid still worked at that androgen level.

eh, as far as I know, Spurfy never ever posted his bloodwork... at least not when I had this argument with him before.

what were your pre-cycle testosterone/FSH/LH levels? what would it have been without the clomid? do you see where I'm going with this? if you really wanna prove the theory, do the same cycle without the clomid... as it is now, you're proving nothing. total HPTA suppression rarely occurs on cycle, and primo is notoriously easy on the HPTA anyway....

btw, why the heck did you choose that cycle? kind of an odd combo....
 
eh, as far as I know, Spurfy never ever posted his bloodwork... at least not when I had this argument with him before.

what were your pre-cycle testosterone/FSH/LH levels? what would it have been without the clomid? do you see where I'm going with this? if you really wanna prove the theory, do the same cycle without the clomid... as it is now, you're proving nothing. total HPTA suppression rarely occurs on cycle, and primo is notoriously easy on the HPTA anyway....

btw, why the heck did you choose that cycle? kind of an odd combo....

also, can you post the link of that study you mentioned again?
 
eh, as far as I know, Spurfy never ever posted his bloodwork... at least not when I had this argument with him before.

what were your pre-cycle testosterone/FSH/LH levels? what would it have been without the clomid? do you see where I'm going with this? if you really wanna prove the theory, do the same cycle without the clomid... as it is now, you're proving nothing. total HPTA suppression rarely occurs on cycle, and primo is notoriously easy on the HPTA anyway....

btw, why the heck did you choose that cycle? kind of an odd combo....
I don’t think spurfy made it up, I k ow I certainly didn’t. And 50mg dbol is not mild. 10 weeks will **** you down without the primo. Many report maintained testicular size too. That tells you it’s working.

Primo + dbol was Arnold’s preferred cycle. So I wanted to give it a try. Felt awesome the whole Tim I believe dbol is similar to oral test, it 5a reduces and aromatises, gives your body all the required hormones. In my experience at least.
 
I thought the biggest reason to not run a SERM during cycle was the reduction in IGF-1 and increase in SHBG which leads to lackluster cycles.
 
I don’t think spurfy made it up, I k ow I certainly didn’t. And 50mg dbol is not mild. 10 weeks will **** you down without the primo. Many report maintained testicular size too. That tells you it’s working.

Primo + dbol was Arnold’s preferred cycle. So I wanted to give it a try. Felt awesome the whole Tim I believe dbol is similar to oral test, it 5a reduces and aromatises, gives your body all the required hormones. In my experience at least.

If dbol converts to dht and e2 and you had your own t from nolva then it's no wonder you felt great! Also you recovered easily and quickly. Sounds like a great cycle mate! :)
 
If dbol converts to dht and e2 and you had your own t from nolva then it's no wonder you felt great! Also you recovered easily and quickly. Sounds like a great cycle mate! :)
Highly recommended. Dbol is awesome. Primo is Pricey though
 
Just recently started running clomid with my trt (I was curious about this for a while now), and my boys are coming back to life, a.k.a getting bigger again. Also noticed an up tick in my libido.........

Thanks for posting. This is proof that even in the presence of external testosterone it simulates LH and FSH. Another good report. :)
 
Back
Top