Guest viewing is limited

Other supps similar to AI Sports "Life?"

DGA3

Member
I'm almost out of my bottle of "Life," and am about to place a supplement order, but before I do, I was just wondering if there are any other products similar to it?

In other words, anything that would be (and I know it's a relative term) "better" than Life?
 
Doesn't their cycle assist come with twice the servings for the same price? It's the powdered one

I use bps cycle guard because I got a bunch on a nutra sale hella long ago
 
mw1 said:
It has TUDCA but is very underdosed with every other ingred. Look at CEL's Cycle Assist
Click to expand...
You can buy products similar to CEL's cycle assist much cheaper.. For example Pure Cycle Project. I bought a bottle of it and a bottle of Brawn Nutrition's TUDCA for cycle support purposes - costed 40 GBP.. One bottle of CEL's Cycle Assist would've been 30 GBP.
 
Antaeus Labs Aegis is superior to all the junk in this thread.

Invalid Link Removed

NP said it would be back in stock this week.
 
ion26 said:
Antaeus Labs Aegis is superior to all the junk in this thread.

Invalid Link Removed

NP said it would be back in stock this week.
Click to expand...

Lol Aegis is not better than Cycle Assist. For liver support strictly? Sure. As an overall cycle aid? No
 
For liver support try Formutech's restore. In the next week logs should start hitting the boards. You can see how good it is.
 
Dr. Hunglow said:
Have you ever taken a step back and thought about how you could really be harming your body by taking all these muscle gain / energy supplements? The FDA doesn't do studies on them. Most of them are too new for anyone to know the potential long-term side effects. The recent Hydroxycut recall is evidence that these products can be dangerous. And using common sense, it's clear our bodies didn't evolve while being exposed to all these synthetic chemicals, so the potential for long-term damage is huge.What's wrong with achieving your goals the 100% natural way? Just sayin'
Click to expand...

#Yolo
 
Dr. Hunglow said:
Have you ever taken a step back and thought about how you could really be harming your body by taking all these muscle gain / energy supplements? The FDA doesn't do studies on them. Most of them are too new for anyone to know the potential long-term side effects. The recent Hydroxycut recall is evidence that these products can be dangerous. And using common sense, it's clear our bodies didn't evolve while being exposed to all these synthetic chemicals, so the potential for long-term damage is huge.What's wrong with achieving your goals the 100% natural way? Just sayin'
Click to expand...

We know the MOA's and pharmacokinetics of many ingredients (people on this board-not me in particular) so we can take an educated risk.

The FDA approves foods i wouldnt even consider food so there insight means little to me
 
The AI Sports product may look cheap, but take a closer look at their supplement facts panel and you'll notice that those doses are per every 2 servings.

In addition to being non-compliantly labeled, this means that you're getting doses similar to 1 serving of cycle support for every 2 servings of life support you're taking.

To comparatively dose the two, you would need two bottles of AI Life support per bottle of Cycle support, putting you at $40 vs. $30.
 
De__eB said:
The AI Sports product may look cheap, but take a closer look at their supplement facts panel and you'll notice that those doses are per every 2 servings.

In addition to being non-compliantly labeled, this means that you're getting doses similar to 1 serving of cycle support for every 2 servings of life support you're taking.

To comparatively dose the two, you would need two bottles of AI Life support per bottle of Cycle support, putting you at $40 vs. $30.
Click to expand...

You missed the biggest point. There is no comparison. AI uses raw plants, CEL extracts for actives. I can't stress enough how overlooked the importance of a proper extract is (*wink wink* Anacyclus)
 
mr.cooper69 said:
You missed the biggest point. There is no comparison. AI uses raw plants, CEL extracts for actives. I can't stress enough how overlooked the importance of a proper extract is (*wink wink* Anacyclus)
Click to expand...

Well, AI claims that "all extracts are standardized" so I wasn't just going to go hit on something for which they have an easy out :p
 
mr.cooper69 said:
You missed the biggest point. There is no comparison. AI uses raw plants, CEL extracts for actives. I can't stress enough how overlooked the importance of a proper extract is (*wink wink* Anacyclus)
Click to expand...

I'm a dummy - could you please explain?
 
DGA3 said:
I'm a dummy - could you please explain?
Click to expand...

I'll try. For example, company 1 and 2 both use extract A, so on paper, it looks like they have the same thing in their products. Company 1, however, uses a generic extract that isn't specific for any particular compound, while company 2 on the other hand is using an extract that is specific for particular compounds. A lot of times when you hear about an extract being good for something, its because that particular extract is being extracted for specific compounds. So in this case, you would want the extract being extracted for a specific compound (company 2) rather than the generic extract that is not specific at all (company 1). Not all extracts are the same, even if they're from the same plant.
 
So in theory, a product that uses extracts for actives would be a better product than one whose extracts come directly from raw plants?

Am I correctly understanding my science lesson here? :approve:
 
DGA3 said:
So in theory, a product that uses extracts for actives would be a better product than one whose extracts come directly from raw plants?

Am I correctly understanding my science lesson here? :approve:
Click to expand...

Both use raw plants, one company uses a specific extract to target actives versus just extracts.
 
DGA3 said:
So in theory, a product that uses extracts for actives would be a better product than one whose extracts come directly from raw plants?

Am I correctly understanding my science lesson here? :approve:
Click to expand...

Precisely. This applies to any herbal product, period. You want an extract
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top