Guest viewing is limited

Anthony Roberts on SARMS s4...check it out

found this on another board

Anthony Roberts on SARMS s4...check it out



Yesterday, I blogged about my experience with S-4, a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator. I had no idea that I’d be getting such a huge response for that one blog post. Right now, I’m conducting more research into the practical application of S-4. I’m not claiming to have discovered this great new thing…you can search many of the major message boards and find that people have been talking about them for literally years. On steroid.com and other places, you can actually see that I approached a couple of research chemical companies a few years back, and asked if they were interested in bringing them to the market (I was intellectually curious, I suppose).

Last December I even spoke to Don Caitlin about them – mostly just asking if they were on his radar yet. He told me that he was aware of them, but that they weren’t really an issue. At that point, I already knew that they were in the United States, and even in the state I was living in at the time.

So remember, SARMs aren’t new – the thing that makes them suddenly interesting again is the fact that I’ve finally gotten first-hand experience in using them, and that they’re available on the market. People have been flooding my inbox asking where to get it, but take a step back for a second and let’s make a list of what S-4 actually does and doesn’t do:

* 1. Undetectable (this doesn’t matter for most of my readers)
* 2. Oral (no injections needed, but this won’t matter for my readers)
* 3. Similar effects to testosterone (libido, strength gains, etc…)
* 4. No conversion to Dihydrotestosterone
* 5. No conversion to estrogen
* 6. As anabolic as testosterone propionate
* 7. No liver toxicity
* 8. Does not inhibit your HPTA (no reduction in LH or FSH)
* 9. (Legal?)

Now, in my experience, the strength gains were very good – although not much weight followed [My experience was in agreement with the Phase-II clinical trial on S-4] In other words we can look at this similarly to a high-dose of Anavar (in terms of strength and weight gains). But unlike Anavar (or Masteron, or Winstrol, or the DHT-Family of steroids), we won’t see a real “hardening effect” from it. We also won’t see the huge gains in muscle that testosterone or anadrol will give us.
SARMs wont make you look like the guy on the left, but they can probably keep you from looking like the guy on the right.

SARMs won't make you look like the guy on the left, but they can probably keep you from looking like the guy on the right.

Remember, virtually all of the DHT-family of steroids (again I’m talking about Masteron, Winstrol, Anavar, Primobolan, Proviron) are what we consider “cutting drugs” – this is not a coincidence. Unfortunately, S-4 does not produce the same look to a physique as these drugs. It produces similar strength gains, and similar weight gains (a few pounds at most), and no water retention – but it just doesn’t make your physique “hard looking” like those other drugs. Realistically, we need to view S-4 as what it is…a nice, mild, non-liver-toxic oral anabolic.

It’s a fair trade off. There is no liver toxicity or inhibition of the HPTA…which is amazing for an oral androgen. It also means:

The ALL-ORAL cycle is now a possibility! Keeping 100% of your gains during PCT is possible!

On the internet, on most message boards, people will attack anyone asking about doing an all oral cycle. But in this case, if you can get your hands on S-4, then an all oral cycle is very possible. S-4 and Anavar would probably be an amazing cycle, but what I’d really like to try is S-4 and Proviron. Proviron is a nice DHT-derived non c17 alpha Alkylated steroid (and is therefore not liver toxic).

Using Proviron with S-4 would be an all oral, non-liver-toxic cycle that combines a nice hardening agent with a nice androgen that effectively replaces testosterone. I’d expect really great results for the average user on a cycle like this, and it has the added benefit of very low side effects – and it is an ALL ORAL cycle that you can run for 12 weeks without worrying about hepatoxicity.

I also think that S-4 has a strong potential for use in PCT. It doesn’t appear to inhibit the HPTA, and is a nice anabolic. I can imagine people making a full recovery using my PCT combined with S-4 and losing literally none of their gains (although they’d probably drop some water weight, I suspect they wouldn’t lose any muscle).

Anyway, I just thought I’d put some theories out there for you, let you know where I’ve been in my experience and research, and let you know what direction I’m going in with my current research on S-4 and SARMs in general.
Bookmark It
 
Well I think you can only get this stuff from research companies and the results are no where near what they are hyped to be. plus bad vision sides, and who knows what that means long term
 
I'm with ya

Scary!

I'm surprised however that there are not more SARMS posts on these forums.

Well I think you can only get this stuff from research companies and the results are no where near what they are hyped to be. plus bad vision sides, and who knows what that means long term
 
Well I think you can only get this stuff from research companies and the results are no where near what they are hyped to be. plus bad vision sides, and who knows what that means long term

lol...you must not of tried them.

The vision sides were only at 100mgs.....

Most are using 50mgs

sarms rocks
 
Hey Junk. What's up.

Please elaborate as to yuor experiences. This stuff intrigues the craps out of me. LOL Thanks
 
anthony roberts from what i've seen, is full of sht.

sarms arent new true.

but they also dont provide the gains the body building community is looking for.

the current sarms out are suited for athletes in my opinion, not for people looking to add mass. (this is why he recomends stacking with anabolic steroids, which defeats the purpose of sarms, to replace aas as a safe effective way to activate the androgen receptor w/o inducing negaive sides, and right now, that sarm does not exist)

right now you cant dose a sarm high enough to get the results of 500mg weekly injections of test.

all sarms currretnly out inhibit hpta function to some degree. this is a fact, a little data based research into sarms, will show you this. sarms should never be used for pct.

sarms seem on the level of low dosed anavar, or turinabol. in that it will provide gains, w/o requiring a pct. they still effect hpta function, just not enough to need pct.
 
anthony roberts from what i've seen, is full of sht.

sarms arent new true.

but they also dont provide the gains the body building community is looking for.

the current sarms out are suited for athletes in my opinion, not for people looking to add mass. (this is why he recomends stacking with anabolic steroids, which defeats the purpose of sarms, to replace aas as a safe effective way to activate the androgen receptor w/o inducing negaive sides, and right now, that sarm does not exist)

right now you cant dose a sarm high enough to get the results of 500mg weekly injections of test.

all sarms currretnly out inhibit hpta function to some degree. this is a fact, a little data based research into sarms, will show you this. sarms should never be used for pct.

sarms seem on the level of low dosed anavar, or turinabol. in that it will provide gains, w/o requiring a pct. they still effect hpta function, just not enough to need pct.

Many guys are using sarms in PCT at a low does and fully recoving, bloodwork proves it.
 
Many guys are using sarms in PCT at a low does and fully recoving, bloodwork proves it.

I can do a 6 week cycle of anavar at 40mg e/d and get decent gains, then get blood work done a month after doing nothing for pct, and be fine. hell, depending on the person, you could probably get blood work done the day after your last pill, and still have t levels high enough to be normal.


anyhow, you can use dhea post cycle and still recover fully, doesn't mean it's a good idea.

sarms effect hpta function. obviously not on the level of 30mg of superdrol, or 500mg of test, but they still inhibit function.

all bloodwork is showing is the t levels are in the normal range. and I havn't seen anyone posting pre cycle blood work, on cycle blood work, immediate post cycle blood work, and then after pct blood work to show how the levels have changed with a sarm.

but I do know what the science tells me, and that is the sarm anthony roberts is describing in the original post isn't available yet.

Its not i dont like sarms, it's just im saying what is out now, isn't what anthony roberts is claiming it is. it's less.
 
anthony roberts from what i've seen, is full of sht.

sarms arent new true.

but they also dont provide the gains the body building community is looking for.

the current sarms out are suited for athletes in my opinion, not for people looking to add mass. (this is why he recomends stacking with anabolic steroids, which defeats the purpose of sarms, to replace aas as a safe effective way to activate the androgen receptor w/o inducing negaive sides, and right now, that sarm does not exist)

right now you cant dose a sarm high enough to get the results of 500mg weekly injections of test.

all sarms currretnly out inhibit hpta function to some degree. this is a fact, a little data based research into sarms, will show you this. sarms should never be used for pct.

sarms seem on the level of low dosed anavar, or turinabol. in that it will provide gains, w/o requiring a pct. they still effect hpta function, just not enough to need pct.

Yea the dude is a idiot, no doubt! Why do people think he's some guru or somethng? He ain't sh*t!
 
Yea the dude is a idiot, no doubt! Why do people think he's some guru or somethng? He ain't sh*t!

People like believing good stories. I doubt anyone reading this can honestly say that they wish what he was saying ISN'T true....We all wish that it was entirely accurate. Would create a change in anabolics forever.
 
I can do a 6 week cycle of anavar at 40mg e/d and get decent gains, then get blood work done a month after doing nothing for pct, and be fine. hell, depending on the person, you could probably get blood work done the day after your last pill, and still have t levels high enough to be normal.


anyhow, you can use dhea post cycle and still recover fully, doesn't mean it's a good idea.

sarms effect hpta function. obviously not on the level of 30mg of superdrol, or 500mg of test, but they still inhibit function.

all bloodwork is showing is the t levels are in the normal range. and I havn't seen anyone posting pre cycle blood work, on cycle blood work, immediate post cycle blood work, and then after pct blood work to show how the levels have changed with a sarm.

but I do know what the science tells me, and that is the sarm anthony roberts is describing in the original post isn't available yet.

Its not i dont like sarms, it's just im saying what is out now, isn't what anthony roberts is claiming it is. it's less.

anavar shuts me down hard...tbol, not so much. I had no shudtown on S4.
 
Why do people think he's full of ****? I'm not choosing one side or another I just want an example as to why people think he's full of ****...
 
Why do people think he's full of ****? I'm not choosing one side or another I just want an example as to why people think he's full of ****...

He has his own agendas on pretty much everything he says. Always speaks half-truths.
 
anavar shuts me down hard...tbol, not so much. I had no shudtown on S4.

so with you saying this i am guessing you must have some lab work done measuring hpta function the entire cycle, and this groundbreaking data from this lab work is showing zero decrease in hpta function during the cycle of s4?

this is truly groundbreaking news! you seriously should have this data published in a journal!

oh wait, im guessing you didn't, no offense, but i would imagine you dont even have pre, intra, post blood work done to back this type of claim up either.
you would need all three to make a claim like this, something also anthony roberts doesn't have, nor does anyone else have this on any sarm yet, because it isn't possible.
---------------
Anthony Roberts is part owner or owner, i cant remember, but he gets a big cut of profits made from that website that sells fake steroids with names similar to aas names, and also a site that sells research chemicals, with s4 being one of them. of course he is going to be pushing s4, he's selling it.
-----------

some of the info he states is true, and factual, but it is mixed with bull shht, and if you ever look at a picture of this guy, you'll see he doesn't use steroids, or work out for that matter.

a little google research on a.roberts (not his real name btw) will tell you he is a piece of shht
 
so with you saying this i am guessing you must have some lab work done measuring hpta function the entire cycle, and this groundbreaking data from this lab work is showing zero decrease in hpta function during the cycle of s4?

this is truly groundbreaking news! you seriously should have this data published in a journal!

oh wait, im guessing you didn't, no offense, but i would imagine you dont even have pre, intra, post blood work done to back this type of claim up either.
you would need all three to make a claim like this, something also anthony roberts doesn't have, nor does anyone else have this on any sarm yet, because it isn't possible.
---------------
Anthony Roberts is part owner or owner, i cant remember, but he gets a big cut of profits made from that website that sells fake steroids with names similar to aas names, and also a site that sells research chemicals, with s4 being one of them. of course he is going to be pushing s4, he's selling it.
-----------

some of the info he states is true, and factual, but it is mixed with bull shht, and if you ever look at a picture of this guy, you'll see he doesn't use steroids, or work out for that matter.

a little google research on a.roberts (not his real name btw) will tell you he is a piece of shht

Good post. I can't believe anyone takes this guy seriously anymore. The guy is obviously a very slick salesman, but he's also full of sh*t. I'd rep you but it won't let me.
 
so with you saying this i am guessing you must have some lab work done measuring hpta function the entire cycle, and this groundbreaking data from this lab work is showing zero decrease in hpta function during the cycle of s4?

this is truly groundbreaking news! you seriously should have this data published in a journal!

oh wait, im guessing you didn't, no offense, but i would imagine you dont even have pre, intra, post blood work done to back this type of claim up either.
you would need all three to make a claim like this, something also anthony roberts doesn't have, nor does anyone else have this on any sarm yet, because it isn't possible.
---------------
Anthony Roberts is part owner or owner, i cant remember, but he gets a big cut of profits made from that website that sells fake steroids with names similar to aas names, and also a site that sells research chemicals, with s4 being one of them. of course he is going to be pushing s4, he's selling it.
-----------

some of the info he states is true, and factual, but it is mixed with bull shht, and if you ever look at a picture of this guy, you'll see he doesn't use steroids, or work out for that matter.

a little google research on a.roberts (not his real name btw) will tell you he is a piece of shht

The research chem company he used to be part owner of (or at least in business with) he had a tissy fit/falling out with the owner, promptly went and snitched on them and now this company is being investigated by the feds... Used to hype their chems like no tomorrow, now he's trying to discredit any and all of their chems... A.R.= one slimey bastard.
 
so with you saying this i am guessing you must have some lab work done measuring hpta function the entire cycle, and this groundbreaking data from this lab work is showing zero decrease in hpta function during the cycle of s4?

this is truly groundbreaking news! you seriously should have this data published in a journal!

oh wait, im guessing you didn't, no offense, but i would imagine you dont even have pre, intra, post blood work done to back this type of claim up either.
you would need all three to make a claim like this, something also anthony roberts doesn't have, nor does anyone else have this on any sarm yet, because it isn't possible.
---------------
Anthony Roberts is part owner or owner, i cant remember, but he gets a big cut of profits made from that website that sells fake steroids with names similar to aas names, and also a site that sells research chemicals, with s4 being one of them. of course he is going to be pushing s4, he's selling it.
-----------

some of the info he states is true, and factual, but it is mixed with bull shht, and if you ever look at a picture of this guy, you'll see he doesn't use steroids, or work out for that matter.

a little google research on a.roberts (not his real name btw) will tell you he is a piece of shht


Look, I dont think anthony roberts is a god. I was simply posting a article I found. There are many form many different people.

Im a big fan of sarms....I will see if I can dig up some other articles regarding sarms not by AR.

There are 15 or 20 logs on Elitefitness concerning sarms.

Its a pretty amazing compound if used correctly.

here is an older thread from AM concerning sarms s4

Invalid Link Removed
 
Anavar? shouldnt mate

dose dependant I beleive. some run it @40mg some @ 80mg.



I would think sarm s4 would be best used a a cutting compound. Keep size while contest dieting or using clen/T3. I feel it would be far less harsh then the current DHT based AAS being used.
 
anything above 50mg and more than 6 weeks, and you will see typical shut down of steroids.

keep it around 40mg, 6 weeks, and you should be good.
 
I would think sarm s4 would be best used a a cutting compound. Keep size while contest dieting or using clen/T3. I feel it would be far less harsh then the current DHT based AAS being used.

this is what sarms out now are excellent for, and what the data based research has shown. this and athletes, looking to maintian strength and muscle mass, without unwanted side effects from steroids like winstrol, turinabol, anavar.

sarms aren't mass producing compounds yet, nor are they the holy grail they should be, yet.

but neither is the serms out now.

seth roberts said, at those high dosage 150mg ect, this s4 sounds like another compound that gives vision problems at that dosage, and will also provide the same type of gains..... he didn't say it, but i did, clomid. and he agreed.

the only lab test sarm s4 i've seen is from R*I, and even that product contained some adulterated product, along with s4.

sarms are tricky business, any change in the molecule can result in dramatically different effects.
be weary of post you read from user accounts, and whats in those research chemicals with powder from china.
 
this is what sarms out now are excellent for, and what the data based research has shown. this and athletes, looking to maintian strength and muscle mass, without unwanted side effects from steroids like winstrol, turinabol, anavar.

sarms aren't mass producing compounds yet, nor are they the holy grail they should be, yet.

but neither is the serms out now.

seth roberts said, at those high dosage 150mg ect, this s4 sounds like another compound that gives vision problems at that dosage, and will also provide the same type of gains..... he didn't say it, but i did, clomid. and he agreed.

the only lab test sarm s4 i've seen is from R*I, and even that product contained some adulterated product, along with s4.

sarms are tricky business, any change in the molecule can result in dramatically different effects.
be weary of post you read from user accounts, and whats in those research chemicals with powder from china.


Yeah I've read in other forums (and beleive it) that the research sarms are not pure and contain hefty amounts of biproducts which could be causing the side effects some are experiencing.

I'm definitely not going to be jumping on any research sarms but I am patiently waiting for a human grade substance to hit the market. :yawn:
 
Yeah I've read in other forums (and beleive it) that the research sarms are not pure and contain hefty amounts of biproducts which could be causing the side effects some are experiencing.

I'm definitely not going to be jumping on any research sarms but I am patiently waiting for a human grade substance to hit the market. :yawn:

most powders that are in pro hormones are made in the same Chinese labs.

sarms at 50mg a day is pretty cool. When you get up around 100mgs, thats when the vision sides kick in.
 
I am just about to start my second month of sarms. I started out at 50mg ed and have increased to 100mg ed. I want to do a two month cycle just to see how much I can get out of this. So far I have been pretty happy with the product and results. No sides other than the vision. I have messed around with prohormones and really, really, really don't want to be shut down again. Does anyone know if I should do a pct just to be safe?

Should I do Nolva, Clomid or both?

Could it hurt or help to do either of those on its own or with the sarms?
 
I am just about to start my second month of sarms. I started out at 50mg ed and have increased to 100mg ed. I want to do a two month cycle just to see how much I can get out of this. So far I have been pretty happy with the product and results. No sides other than the vision. I have messed around with prohormones and really, really, really don't want to be shut down again. Does anyone know if I should do a pct just to be safe?

Should I do Nolva, Clomid or both?

Could it hurt or help to do either of those on its own or with the sarms?

Tell us about you gains? How has the 50mg ed treated you?
 
I am just about to start my second month of sarms. I started out at 50mg ed and have increased to 100mg ed. I want to do a two month cycle just to see how much I can get out of this. So far I have been pretty happy with the product and results. No sides other than the vision. I have messed around with prohormones and really, really, really don't want to be shut down again. Does anyone know if I should do a pct just to be safe?

Should I do Nolva, Clomid or both?

Could it hurt or help to do either of those on its own or with the sarms?

looks like it isn't going to change. idiots using compounds they know nothing about, doesn't matter if it's steroids or sarms, or w/e drug, hey, if it'll get you gains, take it, and worry about the important stuff like pct later.

idiots.
 
Tell us about you gains? How has the 50mg ed treated you?

50mg ed was pretty good to start out. As time went on it seemed like I needed more to keep it as effective. I really have been loading up on calories and carbs so I have gained a couple pounds of lean muscle.

Keep in mind I'm only 180 5'11" and do a lot of cardio. My workouts are awesome on sarms, lot's of energy and intensity I feel like I can go forever. Been able to stay ripped up while eating more and that has allowed me to put on muscle without the bulky feeling. To me this is the best part.

My only other experiences are with Hemobolin 250 and a couple other products in that category. I liked them but hated how I felt after the cycle, too many negatives involved for me.
 
looks like it isn't going to change. idiots using compounds they know nothing about, doesn't matter if it's steroids or sarms, or w/e drug, hey, if it'll get you gains, take it, and worry about the important stuff like pct later.

idiots.

Dude your probably right. When I started in this world I really didn't know much and i took some stuff and didn't like the overall experience.

This time though I did research what i was taking and am trying to find out more. Why blast me down when I'm asking for help?
 
Dude your probably right. When I started in this world I really didn't know much and i took some stuff and didn't like the overall experience.

This time though I did research what i was taking and am trying to find out more. Why blast me down when I'm asking for help?

It always good to do your homework
 
Back
Top