Cynostane post cycle lipid value bloodwork (2 subjects)

Nice! Thanx for posting the blood work - very informative!

//CC
 
Nice bloodwork results. Any details on how effective the cycle itself was? It would definitely be impressive if they made decent gains while keeping lipds in check like this.
 
nightfly71 said:
Nice bloodwork results. Any details on how effective the cycle itself was? It would definitely be impressive if they made decent gains while keeping lipds in check like this.
Click to expand...

There results were good. I would follow the logs going on for more info.:)
 
thanks man, do you know if it worked successful for which each tester was trying to do? i want to cut.
 
freezito said:
thanks man, do you know if it worked successful for which each tester was trying to do? i want to cut.
Click to expand...



If it had not worked it would not have been brought to market.
We will let the unbiased logs here at AMs let people know how good this product is. We do not want to hype the product. Both testers were pleased with the results they had.:)
 
i was skeptical at first do to the lack of info but the blood work and logs look good so far so i will consider this product in the near future
 
pembroke3355 said:
If it had not worked it would not have been brought to market.
We will let the unbiased logs here at AMs let people know how good this product is. We do not want to hype the product. Both testers were pleased with the results they had.:)
Click to expand...

Lack of hype is appreciated but can you produuce some sort of write up on what to expect, what it's recommended for (bulking or cutting, etc.) and a little more info about it? Logs are great, but it's good to get some official info from the company producing it. Thanks.
 
This has already been discussed and they have stated they are going to let the results speak for themselves
 
nightfly71 said:
Lack of hype is appreciated but can you produuce some sort of write up on what to expect, what it's recommended for (bulking or cutting, etc.) and a little more info about it? Logs are great, but it's good to get some official info from the company producing it. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Best bet would be to go to the logs and ask the loggers and ask them if they are bulking or cutting and what diets and training they are doing for it. Then when the logs are finished we will see if was what they expected.:)
 
Okay, so no feedback from the company. Noted. My only thing w/ asking loggers is that I wouldn't expect them to know near as much about a compound as the people who are producing it.

I mean, I could tell you something about things I've tried, but I wouldn't be the expert or the best person to ask. My feedback would maybe be helpful, but still anecdotal. Not trying to nitpick, but getting some info. from the company that produces a product isn't too much to ask.
 
Steveoph said:
Thanks for the bloodwork pembroke. Could you elaborate on the timeframe; I.e. 4-week Cynostane cycle, followed by 4 weeks PCT then blood draw? Those ALT & AST are impeccable, I wish mine were that low I'm jealous.
Click to expand...



Subject 1 was 1 week after pct.

Subject 2 was 2.5 weeks after pct.:)
 
Interesting. I have never seen an oral steroid with liver lipids that good even more than 4 weeks post.
 
for us new to bloodwork can anyone explain these a little please like the difference in normal levels compared with cycle
 
MC Gun said:
for us new to bloodwork can anyone explain these a little please like the difference in normal levels compared with cycle
Click to expand...

Usually any oral steroid will tank HDL levels and make LDL skyrocket.
Total cholesterol and triglycerides may vary. Also if they are methylated, they are very harsh on liver values.
For example, normal HDl levels (good chlosterol) should be above 40. I have seen some after oral cycles in single digits.
 
Why is the 'last' name whited out in the first series and the 'first' name whited out in the second series? I would imagine that those types of things would be uniform from doctor to doctor, lab to lab.

Just something that caught my eye when I first saw these.
 
The way that this lab set up it's testing structure(the base line numbers) is a bit different that what I am used to seeing but is that a 98 LDL on a scale of 0-99?
 
SilentBob187 said:
Why is the 'last' name whited out in the first series and the 'first' name whited out in the second series? I would imagine that those types of things would be uniform from doctor to doctor, lab to lab.

Just something that caught my eye when I first saw these.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I just kinda of seen that but basically wrote it off as one of those things...odd though that the same tech/phys/doc would white out different portions of two subjects name's....especially since it's the same lab tech.
 
It is the last name which is whited out on both not the first. One test was processed in OH as you can see and the other in FL.
Why one of them has the name one way and the other the other way I don't know.

Maybe just the staff person who typed in the info did it different in one location compared to another.

It says the same Dr but that is just the Dr who Lab corp has put his name on it. So if you get your test done in Alaska or in California or anywhere it would have the same Dr.
 
Effective immediately: Cynostane has been discontinued because of the recent happenings in the supplement industry.


Invalid Link Removed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top