Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Irish Cannon Gets on AXIS...with AXIS (Hemodraulix + Kitchen Sink)

Isn't calling a female a skank or a hoe-bag somewhat disrespectful?
Click to expand...

I think he means she was acting skanky, but yes.
Women have needs too. It's not up to you to tell them they should live a monogamous lifestyle.
Click to expand...
Of course women have needs. Where do you see me debating that? What I'm getting at is that if the general public knew what was best for their lives they wouldn't treat sex as such a meaningless act.

As much as you would like to think otherwise, sex really isn't a need in the way you're describing, only for the human race in general. A perfect example...You're married and your wife gets in a car wreck and is paralyzed from the neck down. What then? Are you going to leave her to fulfill your "needs?" Of course it's going to suck to not have the same type of sexual relationship as before, but you made that promise to her to be there forever. Sex was never the need, it was you being there that was the need.

Don't get me wrong in any of this. I'm an extremely sexual person, I just believe it has its place between two married people.

I just get sick of hearing people bitch about AIDS, STDs, Abortion, etc., and then they're told to put on a condom, not to control their urges.

I have never "taken advantage of a situation"... I'm human. The big G gave me a weiner, and all sorts of testosterone... and the biological instinct to reproduce.
Click to expand...

The difference in our thought process is that I don't believe purely in an intelligent designer, but rather a close relationship with my creator who knows best for my life and best for mankind. What I'm told is not to ruin my fun, but to protect me and tell me what's in my best interest.

By the way, where are you meeting all these over 30 "jaded" females? I think you're watching too many Sex in the City reruns... Time to get back to reality.
Click to expand...

Since we don't have the same principles, you don't see things in the same way that I do. I wouldn't expect you to see it that way.

TimberLakers said:
I guess that makes me a skank too.

Good reasoning.

Dudes are studs, and women are whores.

I challenge your notion, and hereby say that this double standard is the reason why women in their 30s are so "jaded"...
Click to expand...

That's pretty much exactly what I was pointing out.
 
There seems to be a common misconception up in this piece that every time a woman is penetrated - that it is a huge emotional event... I really think you may be giving males too much credit.
 
TimberLakers said:
There seems to be a common misconception up in this piece that every time a woman is penetrated - that it is a huge emotional event... I really think you may be giving males too much credit.
Click to expand...

I would argue that when it isn't an emotional event that it's only because they've been so desensitized to the act that it means nothing more to them than a way to relieve some stress.
 
Irish Cannon said:
That's pretty much exactly what I was pointing out.
Click to expand...

Eh, not really at all. You're preaching about abstenance... I'm just saying that I support a woman's right to be sexually active (A WHOREZ RITE THANOMADZ!!! LAWLZ ZOMGGDZZZ PUT THAT BEEAIICH IN HER PLACE ROFL :toofunny:) or completely celebate.
 
Irish Cannon said:
I would argue that when it isn't an emotional event that it's only because they've been so desensitized to the act that it means nothing more to them than a way to relieve some stress.
Click to expand...

I'd strongly prefer the woman that does think of it as an emotional connection, but that's just not how this pans out in reality.

Anyway, I'm not trying to impose beliefs by any stretch... but lets just be conscious about saying who is disrespectful to women, particularly with all the whore bombs and slut bombs being dropped by 19 and 20 year olds up in this...
 
TimberLakers said:
Eh, not really at all. You're preaching about abstenance... I'm just saying that I support a woman's right to be sexually active (A WHOREZ RITE THANOMADZ!!! LAWLZ ZOMGGDZZZ PUT THAT BEEAIICH IN HER PLACE ROFL :toofunny:) or completely celebate.
Click to expand...

That doesn't make any sense. Why would abstinence make women jaded? It's douchebags that make women jaded, and the mentality that you should go around sticking it in anything that offers is quite a douchebag mentality. I'm not referencing anyone here, just sayin'.
 
TimberLakers said:
I'd strongly prefer the woman that does think of it as an emotional connection, but that's just not how this pans out in reality.
Click to expand...

I somewhat agree, but I think often times the emotional aspect doesn't set in until later.

I mean, think about if I did take advantage of the situation. Lets say I followed through with it. What do you think would have happened next? Do you think we'd look at each other the same way again? Do you think she'd soon become attached? Do you think she'd treat me the same as before the incident?

I see no good that could have come from it.
 
Irish Cannon said:
That doesn't make any sense. Why would abstinence make women jaded? It's douchebags that make women jaded, and the mentality that you should go around sticking it in anything that offers is quite a douchebag mentality. I'm not referencing anyone here, just sayin'.
Click to expand...

Didn't say that. :think:
 
Ultimately, the philosophies being debated are founded on a different set of core beliefs.

Politics is different, because definitions are the same, a tax at its root, is defined the same for both republicans and democrats (without getting into the new trend of fishy wording, like calling it a "revenue source"), nonetheless, root definitions are the same and there's a congruence from both sides of what it means. Those definitions are simply being argued with subjective perspectives to justify what to do with these understood definitions.

Having a point of view of "why not?" comes from a core with different definitions, particularly, the definition of right & wrong.

It's well known IC has strong, strong convictions and voices them with the fire of an old time preacher and he never backs down. Timbers is intelligently stubborn and will also argue his beliefs to the death.

I'm just issuing a brief time out before things get over-heated, but I can't arbitrate anyone's log, just say'n. IC & Timbers debating is like fire & oil.

IC already pointed all this out in a simple sentence, I'm just re-emphasizing it.
 
Eh, IC and I have had battles in the past. We don't take it personally anymore. If he did, I wouldn't bother posting in here.
 
Doesnt everything remind us of Seinfeld? :lol:
 
TimberLakers said:
Eh, IC and I have had battles in the past. We don't take it personally anymore. If he did, I wouldn't bother posting in here.
Click to expand...

That's pretty much true, I just feel bad for Mr. Big, I don't know if he was as pliable to the words of AM's own Billy Graham.

I'm used to it, but I've known IC awhile (and we're like minded), anyhoo. How about Obama siding with the President of Honduras in trying to illegally extend his own Honduran Presidency (aka Dictatorship) by breaking their Honduran Constitution, while saying he needs to withhold his criticisms about the rigged elections of Iran?

I'm just kidding, I'm not trying to talk politics, no but seriously, that's effed up and very suspicious in terms of personal motives of his own future presidential reign... okay, okay, I need to stop.
 
VolcomX311 said:
That's pretty much true, I just feel bad for Mr. Big, I don't know if he was as pliable to the words of AM's own Billy Graham.

I'm used to it, but I've known IC awhile (and we're like minded), anyhoo. How about Obama siding with the President of Honduras in trying to illegally extend his own Honduran Presidency (aka Dictatorship) by breaking their Honduran Constitution, while saying he needs to withhold his criticisms about the rigged elections of Iran?

I'm just kidding, I'm not trying to talk politics, no but seriously, that's effed up and very suspicious in terms of personal motives of his own future presidential reign... okay, okay, I need to stop.
Click to expand...

Doesn't surprise me. It's a vivid look into Obama himself. We knew he was a snake when we picked him up.
 
Irish Cannon said:
Doesn't surprise me. It's a vivid look into Obama himself. We knew he was a snake when we picked him up.
Click to expand...

I don't know why those two connections aren't being made a bigger deal. Well, I know why, but that's a serious wtf.

I wouldn't be surprised if he's already trying to pave a way to extend his presidency beyond 2016. I'd surprised & outraged, but not shocked if he pulled that off.
 
TimberLakers said:
:damnit: Apologies, apologies...

Maybe Nomad should go read my TD Form log. :lol:

PS - I just tried to rep him, but he's perpetually red...
Click to expand...
thanks for the rep bro. some a hole gave me -500000 rep points for some stupid thread i started.

i will check out your TD form log when i get off of work tonight

i will do my best to catch up with the busterisms and reps
 
thenomad said:
thanks for the rep bro. some a hole gave me -500000 rep points for some stupid thread i started.

i will check out your TD form log when i get off of work tonight

i will do my best to catch up with the busterisms and reps
Click to expand...

Lol, I only know one a-hole that can kill you for 500k points... and he owns the website...

What was the thread about? Killing babies?
 
TimberLakers said:
Lol, I only know one a-hole that can kill you for 500k points... and he owns the website...

What was the thread about? Killing babies?
Click to expand...

some cashier at wally world. i exaggerated the story a little and he didn't like what i had to say.

it's in general chat "people need to mind their own business. right?"

enjoy. cause i'm getting totally effed up in it.
 
Bahahah! I just read that and it's actually quite funny. I'm confused why you're not getting lots of positive reps for that.

Ya, B5150 will wreck you.
 
You're a single man now. Aren't you supposed to be scoping the checkout lines for attractive cashiers? I do anyways. Makes grocery shopping a little more enjoyable.
 
Day 11

Another intense session.

Delts:

Atlantis Lateral Raise: 100lbs
BB Front Raise: 30lbs
LF Shoulder Press: 100lbs

Legs:

Leg Extensions: 180lbs
Squat Press: 350lbs SUPERSETTED :twisted: w/ V-Squat: 225lbs
Prone Leg Curl: 105lbs

Traps:
DB Shrugs: 80lbs
BB Shrugs: 205lbs

Pumps were great. It felt nice to hobble around the gym because of pumped up legs rather than a crippled back. The Squat Press and V-Squat combo was great. It worked out quite well and I was finally able to engage my Glutes in some action! Hopefully I'll get the legs growing again.

To give everyone a heads-up, I've got some Smash Fully Loaded on hand, and I'll be adding that to the mix when I start cutting in two weeks.
 
I don't see what was so offensive about the comment in the first place. Unless I read it wrong, you didnt intentionally direct it at her.
 
Damn, just read that thread. B-Fed really dropped the administrative, Godfather hammer, yikes.

Invalid Link Removed


Invalid Link Removed
 
Irish Cannon said:
lol. Yaaaaa. That was kind of a d*ck move. Those guys shouldn't really be doing that.
Click to expand...

Welp, at least your friend kept his cool somewhat and survived the confrontation without stepping over the line and getting banned, which seems to be the trend when you have a confrontation with an underboss.

kudos for that.

This probably isn't the best opportunity to say something like this, but B-fed is usually a pretty cool guy. That exchange of ideals wasn't surprising, but that Negclear Bomb was really out of the blue and weird.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top