Am I not right that if the carbs are low the protein will be converted into energy?
Maybe; you are forgetting about the other macronutrient.
Glucoiciuos (sp)?? If the carbs are low and the protein low, then after the protein is converted to energy, not a lot of protein is left over for.. "replacement of old cells, building muscles, organs, blood, nails, hair, skin, and tissues. Protein also takes part in hormone, antibodies, and enzyme formation."........ thus I say if the carbs are low the protein must be high, if you want to grow muscle.
The word you're looking for is gluconeogenesis, and I agree, it is a very bad thing for bodybuilders. But again, you are completely ignoring the 3rd macro.
Protein is KEY, and if you get enuff your calories are gonna be getting a good start. Protein has 4 calories per gram. So if a 200lb man eats 300g of protein he takes in 1200 calories right there. That's 60% of the calories listed in the Dr's funky diet you listed below. Add in carbs and fats and the calories will be over the Dr's 2000K.
Food for thought (no pun intended): in a restricted or semi-restricted kcal diet, is very high protein intake a good thing? Your body will use what you feed it. If you feed it tons of protein, it will get used to burning protein, i.e. gluconeogenesis. So connect the dots here. If your body is A) fed tons of protein; B) becomes conditioned to burning said protein; and C) is in a caloric deficit at least some of the time (and possibly even at maintenance) - what do you think you are risking?
Catabolism, the very thing you are saying high protein intake is supposed to avoid.
There is not a
single calorie-restricted, low-carb, CKD, etc, type diet for bodybuilders (that I am aware of) that espouses a low-carb, low-fat, high protein approach, for the very reason I stated above. More info: Preferentially, the body burns protein last. So if given the choice between using carbs, fats, or aminos to fuel everyday metabolic demand, protein is last on the list. So, if we meet the metabolic demand of the body with 1 or a combination of the other 2 macros, what can be done with the protein intake? The majority of it can be used for what we want it to be used for - tissue repair, i.e. building muscle!
Taking it a step further with a simplified example (and this is what I alluded to earlier): Let's say maintenance is 3000 kcals, and trainee X, a 225-lb bodybuilder, wants to bulk. He sets his daily caloric goal at 4000 kcals. Now, let's say he ingests somewhere around 3000 kcals in fats and carbs, leaving roughly 1000 kcals to come from protein. This is 250g, or 1.11 g/lb. Is trainee X going to grow on this diet? Yes!!
Another example: Trainee X cuts his caloric intake to 2800 kcals, but 100% of it now comes from protein. He is eating 700 g of protein a day, or 3.11 g/lb. Is he going to grow? No!!
My point: protein intake is
not the
key dietary factor for muscle growth, as long as intake is reasonable (not too low). The
key is total caloric intake.
Your not stupid, and neither and am I. We both now everything has to work hand in hand. If your gonna try to grow muscle you have to at the least have your protein, fats, and total calorie intake dialed in. Carbs can be low, there is no such thing as a essentinal carb. But there are essentinal amino's and fats, and you have to have them to grow muscle at a fast rate, along with a good calorie intake. Again Rugger showed how it's done on his Tren- Mdrol log for a low carb bulk. Now I will saw you can bulk even faster if you include more carbs, but the trade off can be water retention for a bloated look, and increased fat gain over the low carb bulk.
I don't disagree with this, it just sounds contradictory to what you said above?
This is sorta gonna mix apples and oranges... Well I'm 37 and guys have been doing comp BBing long before I came around and the good Dr. for that matter. You tell a competive BB that you want him to cut for a comp with under 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight and he will laugh at you, you know how catabolic that would be for a cut? Tell a guy who's been in the gym and put on 30 pounds of LBM over a few years you want him to cut on a 2000K and 1g of protein pr lb. and he will become catabolic.
Now if your a fat ass and you want to follow the Dr's diet to get shredded, you will. Many of the low carb, low calorie diets don't tell the secret truth that your slowing your metabolism down, about starving yourself, and becoming catabolic. You can get shredded on a Keto diet and not be catabolic.
It is true that protein intake should be higher when cutting, but it still should not be the dominant macro. I also think nutrient timing becomes MUCH more important in a cut.
You didn't get my point. You want a steady insulin level, and balanced meals give you that. A little snack isn't gonna spike your insulin level back to where it would be with a balanced meal plan. Spiking you insulin is a good thing pre and post workout, but that spike should be above the steady state insuilin level the balanced and evenly timed meals give you thru the day.
OK
My perception was you were telling me I didn't have a clue and jonhyq was gonna be able to grow the 8lbs of LBM on the 1.02g of protein. Maybe we had a mis-understanding...
Well, he very well may, if caloric intake is high enough. But he's trying to recomp, so kcals may be low at certain points, and in a recomp, I believe the timing is tricky and a
lot depends on the product being used here. But short answer, yeah, one can grow on 1.02 g/lb! See my above example.
I don't need to read it. I think your not stupid and I think we share alot of common thought on diet. Somewhere the wires got crossed and I felt discredited by something that made no sense to me. I think we now see we agree the a bulk has to have protein, fats, and calories spot on. Carbs are open to debate on how guys want to use them.
Again I agree, but again, seems to contradict the above?
-Dragon