Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

get a serm, there's no excuse (newbs read this!)

Let me clarify... I do not TRUST any of the OTC PCT products to ALONE bring me back after a cycle. I have had great results with the use of a SERM, and will continue to use such. All this is strictly MY personal choice - which is why I always add, IMO (IN MY OPINION). 6-OXO may be good, kudos to anyone that may indeed get results from it.

well using just one IMO isnt gunna suffice. but a combination of things will.

i too have had good results with 2 weeks of a SERM and AI for an 8 weeker, starting with s-drol and winztrol, and ending with epimax and oral turinadrol.

but ive been doing days and weeks of research and i came to the conclusion of what i would use if i had all the supps with me individually. trying to get em in 1 product (2 will work though) will be like hell freezing over.

i would use Reversitol, WITH 6oxo (300mg) along with Hemotest by nutrabolics. Complete PCT. although dosing is low on some of the hemotest ingredients.

for me i dont care, im a supplement whore, i have disgusting amounts of PCT products, SERMS and AIs as well as OTC AIs. so to each his own, but check out that PDF i linked in there,

heres another one...
 

Attachments

well using just one IMO isnt gunna suffice. but a combination of things will.

i too have had good results with 2 weeks of a SERM and AI for an 8 weeker, starting with s-drol and winztrol, and ending with epimax and oral turinadrol.

but ive been doing days and weeks of research and i came to the conclusion of what i would use if i had all the supps with me individually. trying to get em in 1 product (2 will work though) will be like hell freezing over.

i would use Reversitol, WITH 6oxo (300mg) along with Hemotest by nutrabolics. Complete PCT. although dosing is low on some of the hemotest ingredients.

for me i dont care, im a supplement whore, i have disgusting amounts of PCT products, SERMS and AIs as well as OTC AIs. so to each his own, but check out that PDF i linked in there,

heres another one...
Wait, have you ever used anything other than an oral steroid?
 
Wait, have you ever used anything other than an oral steroid?


not at the moment, but those are quite different,

first pinnin will be Tren and EQ march i believe, a quick 8-9 week run.

but i dont think that matters, id only use hCG and and OTC protocol for PCT anyway, or it depends on how low my stock gets.

a steroid is a steroid, suppression is supression, some worse then others, but when it comes down to it, these things are strong
 
not at the moment, but those are quite different,

first pinnin will be Tren and EQ march i believe, a quick 8-9 week run.
See, I assume everyone runs what I run... my mistake. My reasoning for the use of SERMs over OTC PCT's is based on Test/Deca/ETC. I only use DS/PH's as jump starters, and NOT the entire cycle.
EDIT: Well, it matters to me. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
 
See, I assume everyone runs what I run... my mistake. My reasoning for the use of SERMs over OTC PCT's is based on Test/Deca/ETC. I only use DS/PH's as jump starters, and NOT the entire cycle.

i can totally understand that,

when i run what im gunna run in march, we will see how i feel,

But i think ill only OTC.

but formulating something with hCG it IS easy to use a SERM and An AI , because there are many other things to take into account.

but if you dont use hCG different story.
 
i can totally understand that,

when i run what im gunna run in march, we will see how i feel,

But i think ill only OTC.

but formulating something with hCG it IS easy to use a SERM and An AI , because there are many other things to take into account.

but if you dont use hCG different story.
It's going to be a completely different ballgame when you run that cycle. I'm jealous - :D
 
It's going to be a completely different ballgame when you run that cycle. I'm jealous - :D

im like uber excited thinking about it, i kinda dont wanna do PCT for what im doing now and just jab lol

but i figure i need a little break.

the tren EQ cycle isnt even long enough to warrent hCG and i can get a nice supp together for OTC, but i have enough SERM and AI (ADEX) to last a while


im looking into making a 2 bottle product that will work synergystically with eachother, to get rid of the need for a SERM hence all my research,

but like i said, they CAN be strong enough. just when people decide to open their minds up a little, (first on weaker cycles) then see how they recover, it may be worth it to them.
 
So after all this, we're talking differences in opinions on PCT depending on whether it was an oral or injectable cycle?
 
Please someone respond. I was going to avoid a serm for a epi/dermacrine cycle until I saw this post which finally convinced me to snag a serm but now if you are talkin injectable cycles and otc is find for mild orals then I would really like to know!
 
Please someone respond. I was going to avoid a serm for a epi/dermacrine cycle until I saw this post which finally convinced me to snag a serm but now if you are talkin injectable cycles and otc is find for mild orals then I would really like to know!

Thats for you to decide, it would be prudent of you to make your own educated decision. Nobody really knows for sure which is better, its all supposition unless you have bloodwork to back it up.

With that said, only a serm will deal with an issue like gyno should it pop up, OTC may help you recover, but a SERM is the only way to deal with female breast development should it occur.
 
Thats for you to decide, it would be prudent of you to make your own educated decision. Nobody really knows for sure which is better, its all supposition unless you have bloodwork to back it up.

With that said, only a serm will deal with an issue like gyno should it pop up, OTC may help you recover, but a SERM is the only way to deal with female breast development should it occur.

I agree, although its not really around anymore but topical formestane was very potent and i've had it knock down some lumps. A fair amount of studies on it too
 
that first statement u made is ABSOLUTLY ABSURD


Agreed... I think we should be careful where this thread goes. It sounds like we are saying that an OTC PCT just isn't going to work and that a serm is the answer. Granted a serm is sometimes necessary(definetly good to have on hand), but should we be leading people down the road of "no OTC PCT works". Correct me if I'm wrong but I have read the entire thread,so far, and it leads me to believe just that.

Are people opting to run OTC pct wasting there time in researching it (and there money)? I personally think that OTC PCT can work(if properly planned and researched). Of course... What I think and the truth are two different things.

AND THATS ALL I'VE GOT TO SAY ABOUT THAT.....:thumbsup:
 
Thats for you to decide, it would be prudent of you to make your own educated decision. Nobody really knows for sure which is better, its all supposition unless you have bloodwork to back it up.

With that said, only a serm will deal with an issue like gyno should it pop up, OTC may help you recover, but a SERM is the only way to deal with female breast development should it occur.

i dont think a SERM is the only way to deal with it.

the reason it happens if because of aromatase, block that, block the problem.
 
What about toying with AAS? In for a penny, in for a pound. OTC aside....if you're buying juice, buy a SERM.


ok Im back in......... Some rational players stepping up.

Test is one thing, designers are another. I totally agree with nolva, clomid and ldex for typical test- cyp, e, prop....I have no problem recommending those type of chemicals for AAS

The problem I am having is these designers, we see case after case where a serm or a serm and AI is used and gyno pops up pissed off and doesnt respond to the serm.

I also believe the companies who designed these compounds had/have an understanding that most ARE NOT going to do SERM PCT ,very little PCT or no PCT at all.

Gynodrol is a bastage, and NO_ONE has the focker figured out. Its luck at best.

I believe successful OTC PCT is very attainable. ALOT OF VARIABLES in this statement though.........Same with SERM PCT though.

Partyman Im with you. Well said.

Crazyfool makin alot of sense as well.
 
Please someone respond. I was going to avoid a serm for a epi/dermacrine cycle until I saw this post which finally convinced me to snag a serm but now if you are talkin injectable cycles and otc is find for mild orals then I would really like to know!
epi is a mild oral suppresion wise.

BUT you guys need to realize M1T is an oral and is one of, IF NOT THE, most suppresive compond out there.... 3 days and your down.

Each and every compound is different. Inject cycles tend to be moe suppresive due to the length of time they are run not "how strong they are". And by no means are most of these designers (with exception to the new ones based off DHEA) mild as well. They can all shut you down, hard and quick. They can also deliver gains the same as an inject cycle in half the time (but yes are harder to maintain due to the exact same fact they were gained so quickly and your so shutdown after the cycle) but by no means does this make one stronger then the other.

Lots of factors have to be taken into account. And what works for me may not work for you! you may need more, or less.

Again even throughout crazy's posts hes left room for error by stating "see what works for you on weaker cycles" well, I by no means want to practice such unsafe experiments with my own body. I KNOW A SERM WILL GET THE JOB DONE EVERY CYCLE, I also add TONS of OTC supps to compliment that SERM. If I worked hard to get those gains then my goodness Im going to do everything it takes to keep em and keep em lookin manly (ie no more ***** tits).

Like I stated before, there are some compounds out that are completely fine with an OTC PCT but those compounds dont even comprise of HALF the oral designers out there and all you guys should reconsider taking them if you are having trouble with this issue.

BTW SERMS are not regionally selective to breast tissue only. Is that where the effects were meant to be seen in most the studies? yes as they are mostly breast cancer meds! but show me ONE study that states the region of action is localized to the breast only and Ill mail you 50bucks. Also they do WONDERS for restoring HTPA and lipids, not JUST BLOCK EST RECEPTORS AT THE BREAST.....
 
i dont think a SERM is the only way to deal with it.

the reason it happens if because of aromatase, block that, block the problem.
what about prolactin and what about other compounds that can directly activate the estrogen receptor?

Also many believe that estrogen can be produced vai other means and conversions then JUST from aromatase... this is just speculation though and is more likely just htat the compound is stimulating the ER itself.
 
i dont think a SERM is the only way to deal with it.

the reason it happens if because of aromatase, block that, block the problem.

How about this, a SERM is the only documented way to deal with gyno, you may be able to prevent gyno with an OTC AI, but as far as dealing with gyno that is forming, or already present, if it were able to be dealt with by an OTC AI I think there would be more people selling the virtues of AI's for gyno.
 
epi is a mild oral suppresion wise.

BUT you guys need to realize M1T is an oral and is one of, IF NOT THE, most suppresive compond out there.... 3 days and your down.

Each and every compound is different. Inject cycles tend to be moe suppresive due to the length of time they are run not "how strong they are". And by no means are most of these designers (with exception to the new ones based off DHEA) mild as well. They can all shut you down, hard and quick. They can also deliver gains the same as an inject cycle in half the time (but yes are harder to maintain due to the exact same fact they were gained so quickly and your so shutdown after the cycle) but by no means does this make one stronger then the other.

Lots of factors have to be taken into account. And what works for me may not work for you! you may need more, or less.

Again even throughout crazy's posts hes left room for error by stating "see what works for you on weaker cycles" well, I by no means want to practice such unsafe experiments with my own body. I KNOW A SERM WILL GET THE JOB DONE EVERY CYCLE, I also add TONS of OTC supps to compliment that SERM. If I worked hard to get those gains then my goodness Im going to do everything it takes to keep em and keep em lookin manly (ie no more ***** tits).

Like I stated before, there are some compounds out that are completely fine with an OTC PCT but those compounds dont even comprise of HALF the oral designers out there and all you guys should reconsider taking them if you are having trouble with this issue.

BTW SERMS are not regionally selective to breast tissue only. Is that where the effects were meant to be seen in most the studies? yes as they are mostly breast cancer meds! but show me ONE study that states the region of action is localized to the breast only and Ill mail you 50bucks. Also they do WONDERS for restoring HTPA and lipids, not JUST BLOCK EST RECEPTORS AT THE BREAST.....

Spence, there are too many here that have ABSOLUTELY NO clue about the endocrine system, or pharmacology what-so-ever in general. Internet warriors at their finest.

It's a lost topic man.......

At this point, i can only laugh at the advice given by some here. These are people with NO CLINICAL OR EDUCATIONAL experience to back up their postings.

End of story.......
 
epi is a mild oral suppresion wise.

BUT you guys need to realize M1T is an oral and is one of, IF NOT THE, most suppresive compond out there.... 3 days and your down.

Each and every compound is different. Inject cycles tend to be moe suppresive due to the length of time they are run not "how strong they are". And by no means are most of these designers (with exception to the new ones based off DHEA) mild as well. They can all shut you down, hard and quick. They can also deliver gains the same as an inject cycle in half the time (but yes are harder to maintain due to the exact same fact they were gained so quickly and your so shutdown after the cycle) but by no means does this make one stronger then the other.

Lots of factors have to be taken into account. And what works for me may not work for you! you may need more, or less.

Again even throughout crazy's posts hes left room for error by stating "see what works for you on weaker cycles" well, I by no means want to practice such unsafe experiments with my own body. I KNOW A SERM WILL GET THE JOB DONE EVERY CYCLE, I also add TONS of OTC supps to compliment that SERM. If I worked hard to get those gains then my goodness Im going to do everything it takes to keep em and keep em lookin manly (ie no more ***** tits).

Like I stated before, there are some compounds out that are completely fine with an OTC PCT but those compounds dont even comprise of HALF the oral designers out there and all you guys should reconsider taking them if you are having trouble with this issue.

BTW SERMS are not regionally selective to breast tissue only. Is that where the effects were meant to be seen in most the studies? yes as they are mostly breast cancer meds! but show me ONE study that states the region of action is localized to the breast only and Ill mail you 50bucks. Also they do WONDERS for restoring HTPA and lipids, not JUST BLOCK EST RECEPTORS AT THE BREAST.....


alrighty where to start with this one lol its kinda long and i had a rough day, but my work out was good.

OK

bolded statement wasnt intended to be read how you read it,

i meant for something like halodrol where most people will argue a serm isnt neccesary, or an epi product....

Try an OTC PLANNED PCT with the right ingredients that WILL get you back to normal, have before and after blood work. if your please with it, it shows that it works well and would likely work for a more suppressive cycle.


ok 2nd bolded.... yea your right, but have mentionewd in previous post that they do increase your test levels LH FSH. which is another reason why people conform to SERMs....

you wanna bind to receptor? the way a serm will , fine, Genistein will do just that, Want to bind to the aromatase enzyme and keep estro levels basically unaffected, use 6 oxo. but most of the aromatase is found in the breast. so by blocking aromatase and increasing test levels, you have a SERM like compound. in which it increases Test, LH and FSH, keeps Estro levels unnaffected. and its strong as well.


did any one read those PDFs?
 
alrighty where to start with this one lol its kinda long and i had a rough day, but my work out was good.

OK

bolded statement wasnt intended to be read how you read it,

i meant for something like halodrol where most people will argue a serm isnt neccesary, or an epi product....

Try an OTC PLANNED PCT with the right ingredients that WILL get you back to normal, have before and after blood work. if your please with it, it shows that it works well and would likely work for a more suppressive cycle.


ok 2nd bolded.... yea your right, but have mentionewd in previous post that they do increase your test levels LH FSH. which is another reason why people conform to SERMs....

you wanna bind to receptor? the way a serm will , fine, Genistein will do just that, Want to bind to the aromatase enzyme and keep estro levels basically unaffected, use 6 oxo. but most of the aromatase is found in the breast. so by blocking aromatase and increasing test levels, you have a SERM like compound. in which it increases Test, LH and FSH, keeps Estro levels unnaffected. and its strong as well.


did any one read those PDFs?

Before we go any further, your education level in this regard is what exactly?

Not to throw stones here, but i'm tired or arguing with the "internet warriors" that don't know their head from their azz overall.....

BTW..... your first pdf posting is from 1982!!!!
 
Before we go any further, your education level in this regard is what exactly?

Not to throw stones here, but i'm tired or arguing with the "internet warriors" that don't know their head from their azz overall.....


if your tryinng to call me dumb im FAR from it ( and i believe your trying to call me a retard?)

NO actual formal teaching other then peer reviewed studies, about 4 years researching on all topics related to it,

Actually in my nutrition communication class im trying to get a grant for a study, on Binding affinity of Phytoestrogens/chemicals in breast tissue in relation to conventional treatment,

things need to be gone over with the board before anything can be let loose.

i do countless hours every night on pubmed looking and searching. and i have some articles. and PDFs,

LOOK AT THE PDFs i posted.

although in 1982, does that mean the treatments lost potency? or for some reason not as potent now? i dont think so.
 
I don't think T1 is calling, much less alluding to you being a "retard." Which, btw, is a really disgusting word to use, period.
Maybe he wants to delve deeper in to your psyche to see where you are in your education - that's all.
 
if your tryinng to call me dumb im FAR from it ( and i believe your trying to call me a retard?)
NO actual formal teaching other then peer reviewed studies, about 4 years researching on all topics related to it,

Actually in my nutrition communication class im trying to get a grant for a study, on Binding affinity of Phytoestrogens/chemicals in breast tissue in relation to conventional treatment,

things need to be gone over with the board before anything can be let loose.

i do countless hours every night on pubmed looking and searching. and i have some articles. and PDFs,

LOOK AT THE PDFs i posted.

although in 1982, does that mean the treatments lost potency? or for some reason not as potent now? i dont think so.

Now, did i say that, or did you? I'm going to say the latter there. End of story.....

I didn't say you're "retarded", but if you want to have a serious converstion about this i'd like to see some kind of educational substance to back it up. You know as i do that TOO man internet warriors state things that they themselves have no clue about.

BTW - You're talking to an active memeber in medical practice and research. The 1982 article is completely irrelevant at this point. Not to metion research is MANY fold. One supportive article means just bout squat in the medical field.......Not to mention being from over 25 years ago. :rolleyes:
 
I don't think T1 is calling, much less alluding to you being a "retard." Which, btw, is a really disgusting word to use, period.
Maybe he wants to delve deeper in to your psyche to see where you are in your education - that's all.

Exactly sir! :thumbsup:
 
Test + Deca for 12 weeks. Nolva + Clomid + HCG for PCT = Success.

Discuss. :D

Invalid Link Removed


i like the idea .. although very untraditional to the SERM AI approach,

if i were to use both nolva and clomid id stimulate first with Clomid, then continue with Nolva while running aromasin at 10mg a day.
 
alrighty where to start with this one lol its kinda long and i had a rough day, but my work out was good.

OK

bolded statement wasnt intended to be read how you read it,

i meant for something like halodrol where most people will argue a serm isnt neccesary, or an epi product....

Try an OTC PLANNED PCT with the right ingredients that WILL get you back to normal, have before and after blood work.

BUT where were you really at the end of the cycle, pre PCT? your trying to prove the efficacy of a PCT regimin not total cycle recovery and you need to know exactly how far suppressed youve become from normal levels and how well youve since recovered hopefully up to or above that of what was first established.

if your please with it, it shows that it works well and would likely work for a more suppressive cycle.

NO, all youve done is proved that it will work for THAT cycle you just ran! an admittably easy to recover from cycle(with a SERM that is) to begin with! I could get good normal range test results just by doing nothing after 4 weeks! or all Id need is a simple test booster or AI to make that test come back ok for a weak cycle. But whats happened to my body in the mean time? namely the start?

Either way not EVERYONE can take YOUR pct and get the same results... like I said without knowing how supressed you became throughout the duration of the cycle whos to say you wouldnt show normal range test results at the end??? normal range is also subective AS its typically 280-800ng/dl and I for one dont want to start with 800 end with 400 and call it a success cause its normal for joe schmo 50 year old.
ok 2nd bolded.... yea your right, but have mentionewd in previous post that they do increase your test levels LH FSH. which is another reason why people conform to SERMs....
this is where the post should have started and ended.

you wanna bind to receptor? the way a serm will , fine, Genistein will do just that, Want to bind to the aromatase enzyme and keep estro levels basically unaffected, use 6 oxo. but most of the aromatase is found in the breast. so by blocking aromatase and increasing test levels, you have a SERM like compound. in which it increases Test, LH and FSH, keeps Estro levels unnaffected. and its strong as well.

funny thing is none of this you mentioned holds merit other then in theory. Its not SERM like in the least, its a multitude of other actions that dont still have as efficient an effect as a single reseached SERM. All research on SERMs have multitudes of published studies backing them and have stood the test of time.

Sure some of these compounds have SERM like actions, they are mostly phyto estrogens and will undoubtedly bind to the estrogen receptor. But what are they doing while they are there? do they neutralize the actions of the ER or are they activating it? will they do more harm then good? are they even that active when taken orally? can they make it through first pass?

I dont know why you continue to bring 6-OXO into the picture? its actions are in no way similar to that of a serm and no one disputes the efficiancy of a steroidal (suicidal) aromatase inhibitor, in fact I think that in conjunction with a SERM these make for quite a pleasent and comprehensive PCT.... stand alone though.... what good is an AI really going to do for you at jumpstarting HTPA? if your truely shutdown then youll have such a small amount of test to begin with you wont have to worry bout it aromatizing and yes it will leave current levels of est UNEFFECTED.

So what have you done? youve dropped all androgen use and now have a large amount of estrogen floating around. this ratio of T:E is extremely harsh on ones body since it was just used to having an abnormally larger amount of androgens around and NOW you got nothing but estrogen... sure your not making more estrogen (via aromatase) but basically all you got is that! your body will definately take a feminine turn for the worse at this point (how far is up to your individual body and diff each cycle among other outside factors like cortisol and prolactin levels) and what you need is something that will unequivocally block that estrogen from exerting any effect @ the receptor itself (as Estrogen is already there and an AI wont help you now) and your body is then in shock.... its like "oh crap no test!! no est!!! and BOOM your body gets movin overtime trying to produce test (some like clomind work via other stimulation some through multiple pathways), at the same time aromatase (why AI's help IN CONJUNCTION TO A SERM) so it can in turn create estrogen.

Now other wonderful things like nettle root and Saw Palmetto Extract (and similar herbs) will continue to help preserve your test in its most precious form via blocking SHBG and 5a reductase. but will only work once test is present to optimize test levels NOT restart production.

did any one read those PDFs?


yes and thos silly PDF's did nothing ot convince me that you know what your talking bout here cause you can list a bunch of compounds with AI activity (which was likely DL'ed or copied from elsewhere) and then attach it to a post.


Once again if you can have an almost non suppresive cycle to begin with that wont leave you with outta wack T:E levels and/or hasnt already began to exert an estrogenic effect via other means (ie anadrol and superdrol) then yes a completely OTC pct can be succesfully run. But for any of these new guys to read your posts and think it will work is foolish. not everyone can afford to run blood and even if they could do they know what it even means? Honestly the only way one can be assured recovery and ommitance of estrogenic suicide is to use a SERM for even the "mildly suppresive" compounds you like to stack and run for 8 weeks.

Ill leave you with this

poopypants said:
I by no means want to practice such unsafe experiments with my own body. I KNOW A SERM WILL GET THE JOB DONE EVERY CYCLE, I also add TONS of OTC supps to compliment that SERM. If I worked hard to get those gains then my goodness Im going to do everything it takes to keep em and keep em lookin manly
 
BUT where were you really at the end of the cycle, pre PCT? your trying to prove the efficacy of a PCT regimin not total cycle recovery and you need to know exactly how far suppressed youve become from normal levels and how well youve since recovered hopefully up to or above that of what was first established.



NO, all youve done is proved that it will work for THAT cycle you just ran! an admittably easy to recover from cycle(with a SERM that is) to begin with! I could get good normal range test results just by doing nothing after 4 weeks! or all Id need is a simple test booster or AI to make that test come back ok for a weak cycle. But whats happened to my body in the mean time? namely the start?

Either way not EVERYONE can take YOUR pct and get the same results... like I said without knowing how supressed you became throughout the duration of the cycle whos to say you wouldnt show normal range test results at the end??? normal range is also subective AS its typically 280-800ng/dl and I for one dont want to start with 800 end with 400 and call it a success cause its normal for joe schmo 50 year old.

this is where the post should have started and ended.



funny thing is none of this you mentioned holds merit other then in theory. Its not SERM like in the least, its a multitude of other actions that dont still have as efficient an effect as a single reseached SERM. All research on SERMs have multitudes of published studies backing them and have stood the test of time.

Sure some of these compounds have SERM like actions, they are mostly phyto estrogens and will undoubtedly bind to the estrogen receptor. But what are they doing while they are there? do they neutralize the actions of the ER or are they activating it? will they do more harm then good? are they even that active when taken orally? can they make it through first pass?

I dont know why you continue to bring 6-OXO into the picture? its actions are in no way similar to that of a serm and no one disputes the efficiancy of a steroidal (suicidal) aromatase inhibitor, in fact I think that in conjunction with a SERM these make for quite a pleasent and comprehensive PCT.... stand alone though.... what good is an AI really going to do for you at jumpstarting HTPA? if your truely shutdown then youll have such a small amount of test to begin with you wont have to worry bout it aromatizing and yes it will leave current levels of est UNEFFECTED.

So what have you done? youve dropped all androgen use and now have a large amount of estrogen floating around. this ratio of T:E is extremely harsh on ones body since it was just used to having an abnormally larger amount of androgens around and NOW you got nothing but estrogen... sure your not making more estrogen (via aromatase) but basically all you got is that! your body will definately take a feminine turn for the worse at this point (how far is up to your individual body and diff each cycle among other outside factors like cortisol and prolactin levels) and what you need is something that will unequivocally block that estrogen from exerting any effect @ the receptor itself (as Estrogen is already there and an AI wont help you now) and your body is then in shock.... its like "oh crap no test!! no est!!! and BOOM your body gets movin overtime trying to produce test (some like clomind work via other stimulation some through multiple pathways), at the same time aromatase (why AI's help IN CONJUNCTION TO A SERM) so it can in turn create estrogen.

Now other wonderful things like nettle root and Saw Palmetto Extract (and similar herbs) will continue to help preserve your test in its most precious form via blocking SHBG and 5a reductase. but will only work once test is present to optimize test levels NOT restart production.




yes and thos silly PDF's did nothing ot convince me that you know what your talking bout here cause you can list a bunch of compounds with AI activity (which was likely DL'ed or copied from elsewhere) and then attach it to a post.


Once again if you can have an almost non suppresive cycle to begin with that wont leave you with outta wack T:E levels and/or hasnt already began to exert an estrogenic effect via other means (ie anadrol and superdrol) then yes a completely OTC pct can be succesfully run. But for any of these new guys to read your posts and think it will work is foolish. not everyone can afford to run blood and even if they could do they know what it even means? Honestly the only way one can be assured recovery and ommitance of estrogenic suicide is to use a SERM for even the "mildly suppresive" compounds you like to stack and run for 8 weeks.

Ill leave you with this

i do understand what your saying, the T:E ratio is important and i belive oxo shifts that RATIO and makes it more favorable, at least thats what the study says.
 
i do understand what your saying, the T:E ratio is important and i belive oxo shifts that RATIO and makes it more favorable, at least thats what the study says.
6-OXO? That may be a good product, but I've also read claims from that same company that are just too far fetched. Independent studies that are posted online are anything but legit, IMO. You know that old saying, "You wash my back, yadda yadda yadda...."
I would consider using an OTC product, but not too bring me back from the cycles that I run.
 
i do understand what your saying, the T:E ratio is important and i belive oxo shifts that RATIO and makes it more favorable, at least thats what the study says.
it only shifts that ratio in a normal test boosting application sir the way it was intitally designed and undoubtedly tested, not in a suppressed PCT setting where the ratio is far outweighed in favor of est already and all you can hope for is stopping the increase of that ratio in an unfavorable manor by blocking aromatase.

His study is correct when read with all factors accounted for and variables included.
 
6-OXO? That may be a good product, but I've also read claims from that same company that are just too far fetched. Independent studies that are posted online are anything but legit, IMO. You know that old saying, "You wash my back, yadda yadda yadda...."
I would consider using an OTC product, but not too bring me back from the cycles that I run.

Yes sir.......Posting bloodwork online to support a product is a JOKE!

Can you say......SUBJECTIVE!!! and UNRELIABLE!!!!
 
Yes sir.......Posting bloodwork online to support a product is a JOKE!

Can you say......SUBJECTIVE!!! and UNRELIABLE!!!!

as it is and very well may be subjective, there its still no reason to doubt, ATD has done many people good things as well as 6 bromo, Trans Resveratrol seems to be the new thing.
 
as it is and very well may be subjective, there its still no reason to doubt, ATD has done many people good things as well as 6 bromo, Trans Resveratrol seems to be the new thing.
Key word, "new thing."
ATD is a libido killer, and 6 Bromo has been linked to actually suppressing people.
It's all in the users hands, though.
 
Key word, "new thing."
ATD is a libido killer, and 6 Bromo has been linked to actually suppressing people.
It's all in the users hands, though.

Links of 6-bromo acutally suppressing people? In PCT or standalone? I know PA and others mentioned awhile back of the potential of one of the isomers being steroidal. I can;t remember.
 
as it is and very well may be subjective, there its still no reason to doubt, ATD has done many people good things as well as 6 bromo, Trans Resveratrol seems to be the new thing.

Ok, anything online is subjective REGARDLESS.

Shall we start with discussing the hpta axis and hormonal suppresson, and upregulation?

How about even before we dive into that topic, that we clarify the understanding of body systems, anatomy, physiology, and the definiton of a "homeostasis" environment?

I'm ready, U?
 
Ok, anything online is subjective REGARDLESS.

Shall we start with discussing the hpta axis and hormonal suppresson, and upregulation?

How about even before we dive into that topic, that we clarify the understanding of body systems, anatomy, physiology, and the definiton of a "homeostasis" environment?

I'm ready, U?

Do it! I will read it:thumbsup::lol:
 
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz7_3n7xyDg"]YouTube - Liam Lynch: United States of Whatever[/ame]
 
Links of 6-bromo acutally suppressing people? In PCT or standalone? I know PA and others mentioned awhile back of the potential of one of the isomers being steroidal. I can;t remember.


alpha isomer, although its been said that theres to much steric strain on the molecule, so it wont convert to that hormone,

i think any dose of it over 100-150 mg is borderline for possible suppression.

i think a mixture of isomers dosed at abou 60-100 would be great though.

ATD has been linked as a libido killer in only high doses

otherwise i havent seen much libido loss at around 50mg per day.
 
Ok, anything online is subjective REGARDLESS.

Shall we start with discussing the hpta axis and hormonal suppresson, and upregulation?

How about even before we dive into that topic, that we clarify the understanding of body systems, anatomy, physiology, and the definiton of a "homeostasis" environment?

I'm ready, U?

i mean works for me, where to begin though lol. but seriously, my knowledge probably isnt as extensive as yours being that your in the medical feild am i am not. i just do my research and go by subjective veiws, and come up with my answers regaurding the research.

either way, its past my bed time i got class in the am, Anatomy and physiology actually lol
 
alpha isomer, although its been said that theres to much steric strain on the molecule, so it wont convert to that hormone,

i think any dose of it over 100-150 mg is borderline for possible suppression.

i think a mixture of isomers dosed at abou 60-100 would be great though.

ATD has been linked as a libido killer in only high doses

otherwise i havent seen much libido loss at around 50mg per day.

I don;t know what isomer HDx2 is but 200mg of that stuff for me was insane!

Yeah ATD hurts most people, but when Novadex XT came out I ran it for 4 weeks at 75mg and it didn't kill my libido. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

Edit- WTF does steric strain mean?
 
The overall strain in a molecule due to the non-bonded interactions of atoms or groups of atoms that are in close proximity so that their electrons repel each other.
 
as it is and very well may be subjective, there its still no reason to doubt, ATD has done many people good things as well as 6 bromo, Trans Resveratrol seems to be the new thing.


I never quite understood your obsession with OTC AI's over SERMs. As Sol stated earlier with little to no clinical research done on OTC AI's, if there were they'd likely find that their liver toxicity is worse than SERMs. Especially steroidal AI's such as ATD.

Also AI's, especially steroidal will have negative effects on cholesterol levels - which after running a steroid is like throwing sand on the beach. Whereas SERMs such as Nolva and Torem can improve lipids as leaving estro in the body where it's needed. I don't see one advantage of an OTC PCT personally.

As far as bloodwork goes it's always good to see a copy of the actual scanned certificate as anyone could type in whatever they wanted. Also if you draw blood after an AAS cycle from someone who's on a steroidal AI - of course their Test is going to be up. As their cholesterol would be.

I wonder what would happen if someone approached Arnold, Lee Haney, or Jay Cutler who's been using gear non-stop and asked them to use ATD instead of the SERM their circle has successfully used 1,000's of times over the years :think:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top