Which is the better form to take? I see both used equally in products.
I think people are more interested in resveratrol for the anti-oxidant properties, and the studies that have shown it may have potential in preventing many age-related diseases (diabetes, alzheimers, etc.). I don't think people are expecting to get huge of ResveratrolYou want trans, also I dont see what all the "whoo ha" is about, I dont see logs of people getting all this aggression and training intensity and on and on from resveratrol products.
I want it for my wife, she has a lump in her neck which may be cancer.You want trans, also I dont see what all the "whoo ha" is about, I dont see logs of people getting all this aggression and training intensity and on and on from resveratrol products.
Well you can use an extract standarized for resveratrol (total).I want it for my wife, she has a lump in her neck which may be cancer.
The bioavailablity of trans is already weak enough, resveratrol must be close to helpless.the trans-isomer is the extract that you are looking for. The higher the percentage the better. The bioavailbility of non-extracted japenese knotweed (resveratrol) is very very poor.
First step is to see a doctor. Debating the benefits of a resveratrol product should not even be at the forefront of your mind.I want it for my wife, she has a lump in her neck which may be cancer.
dep. on what your using it for, if you using it for some antioxidant effect, anti cancer type effects you can go with total. Total res. has 4 res. isomers, the other extracts standardized for trans. has all 4 isomers also, just the trans res. is quantified.So total resveratrol, instead of trans?
Good thing I agree, then, huh? Otherwise I'd be a total retard, right?First step is to see a doctor. Debating the benefits of a resveratrol product should not even be at the forefront of your mind.
It is absurd to think that any supplement is going to alter the course of an unknown neoplasm in the neck.
cheers.
Very good, thanks, Chuck.dep. on what your using it for, if you using it for some antioxidant effect, anti cancer type effects you can go with total. Total res. has 4 res. isomers, the other extracts standardized for trans. has all 4 isomers also, just the trans res. is quantified.
I think that seeking a supplement with anti-neoplastic properties for a neoplasm that you do not even know IS a true neoplasm or cancer for that matter is somewhat along the lines of "retarded".Good thing I agree, then, huh? Otherwise I'd be a total retard, right?
Her biopsy is on the 9th. Until then, I'm doing research. Nifty, huh?
I'm looking at every option. At this point, we don't know, but we will soon. Until then, call it MY therapy, or way of dealing. OK?
I think that seeking a supplement with anti-neoplastic properties for a neoplasm that you do not even know IS a true neoplasm or cancer for that matter is somewhat along the lines of "retarded".
There's no such thing as 'complete confidence'. I certainly wouldn't use ANY 'researched' cancer treatment proposed by an MD with 'complete confidence': it may or may not stop the cancer, andit may or may not have long term health effects.No research has been done to the extent that would implicate complete confidence in TRUE anti-cancer properties of ANY of the aforementioned supplements in human use.
Who says I'm not? It was brought up in my original thread a month ago.You may as well consider overall caloric/dietary restriction as anti-cancer it has been MUCH further studied in cancer rather than resveratrol.
You're a ****. Get out of my thread.Heck, even a good support network has been shown to help with cancer so you may even consider powering down the computer and simply giving her a hug rather than cellulose wrapped resveratrol.
cheers. :clap2:
i wouldn't buy anything from that shady outfit, period!Ok, so this isn't great?
Giant Nutrition .:. Cast a shadow across the face of sports nutrition
I won't even begin to relay pertinent information regarding anti-cancer therapies that have been proven in 100's of peer reviewed journals and clinical trials.There's no such thing as 'complete confidence'. I certainly wouldn't use ANY 'researched' cancer treatment proposed by an MD with 'complete confidence': it may or may not stop the cancer, andit may or may not have long term health effects.
You're a ****. Get out of my thread.
I haven't seen one from you yet, in this thread. Feel free.For the most part, positive contributions are accepted widely on this forum.
cheers.
I have have provided a number of positive contributions, just because you disagree does not render it negative.What's this got to do with you, deerdeer? Nothing, of course, except that you seem to share the same shitty attitude and superiority complex my wife's doctor has.
Have her stick to simple healthy dieting and living, suggesting supps can cause more unnecessary stress! All too often I see pateints shifting and altering their regimens by going with supplements that have the potential to negatively alter a therapeutic outcome because of something they read on the internet.
You guys are reading a lot into my posts. Why not ask if the doctor knows what she's doing? I never said the dr didn't, but you assumed. In fact, I never said WHAT we're doing, if anything; I said I'm simply researching.Especially when your doctor has no clue what you're doing outside of their prescribed treatment
We did.If you have an issue with a doc's bedside manners or possible negligence, then find another doctor.
How kind of you to ask! She's been on green tea for a long time. When we found out, we added curcumin to it, that's it EDIT: and ashitaba, as her sister sent her some. I'm looking at supplements which are beneficial for overall health, as well as having potential benefits against cancer in general. Once we know what it is, and the doctors formulate a plan, we'll let them know what she's taking.So what ARE you doing, exactly?