Post deleted
Last edited:
So Nolva, being a pure anti-estrogenic isomer, is not having an anti-estrogenic effect at the hypothalamaus?Re-read my posts - apparently, it isn't sinking in. I HAVE SUGGESTED TIME AND TIME AGAIN that NOLVA DOES NOT ACT IN AN INHIBITORY WAY AT THE HYPOTHALAMUS, suggesting it harbors attenuated efficacy.
D_
You should probably cool it on the irrelevant exulting verbiage.Wow...far be it from me to respond to such clever inscription. Still, I would be the one who would be reprimanded by "moderators" not being a board sponsor and all.
Well, again I just encourage you to learn the act of reading is all. I can't help you in that department. I have explained my view 3 different ways on the same freaking point and it still hasn't gotten through the layers, so I bid you adieu as this has gone nowhere as was anticipated.
D_
I am sure i'm not the only one but I think the majority of people who could really benefit from your wisdom get lost in your 'wordiness', sometimes it really pays to keep it simple for those that like access to quality, concise knowledge that you have.If it wasn't clear...btw...NO!
D_
Let's see ... I will correct again, sure. I haven't posted but a handful of posts in the last 6 months at DA, so would you like to continue to attack, displaying how much you do NOT know about me or address the issues at hand. This is prototypical strawman attempts. Again, I am not really phased by gang-philosophy of bb message boards (but you likely know that as you apparently claim to know me better than me).
Never have I advertised services here, which is funny as people continue to express how much they don't know. Reality is I do well without you and despite the suggestions of moderators (which by definition should not realistically take a side in any such argument, when again I reask that you take a look at initial comments in this exchange).
Want to continue talking? I parted ways with MAN back late last year. Do you really want to keep displaying the huge disparity that exists in what you know about me? Completely ludicrous and likely borderline asinine.
D_
I will continue to post, with high likelihood, however, not here. People to further their plight have construed this as me attacking, but really I have gotten it from the get-go, attacked in the very way people are accusing me of doing to them, and I have been on the defensive it has been further construed in a way that is absolutely ludicrous (people who are familiar with my posts know this).Keep posting Dinoiii.Some of us still appreciate your info.
well i was just going to say old school knows best.....In your own words, based on exactly what?
Originally Posted by Kristofer68SS
I concur.
I would really like to see the clomid/nolva debate go on further.
I still think clomid is a better choice for returning test, preferably with HCG, and Nolva as an Anti-E for normal gyno concerns.
I must admit, i derailed the topic as well.
My apologies.......
D, where are you?
well i was just going to say old school knows best.....
But Dinoii, pretty much summed it up.........
LOL.......
:think:As a result, people will say "dinoiii says to use Clomid" (and this is NOT the case, but it is what will happen).
point taken........:think:
i agree, and repped him for you.On a side note, way to man up ImJ2x.
"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to ImJ2x again."
My logic on why nolva is superior to clomid is pretty solid.So was that reply from Dinoii what you were hoping for Pp?
Hopefully he can clear the emotional clouding, take a deep breath and explain in laymans terms his POV and stance.My logic on why nolva is superior to clomid is pretty solid.
I was expecting Dino to explain himself on why he would choose Clomid over Nolva. Sounds like he is too “offended” to justify his stance.
-Pp
Says you.Yeah and this thread would be 100x better if everyone wouldn't have put their useless .02 in and let PP and dinoii actually duke it out.